Literature DB >> 33419013

Using a Multiclass Machine Learning Model to Predict the Outcome of Acute Ischemic Stroke Requiring Reperfusion Therapy.

I-Min Chiu1,2, Wun-Huei Zeng2, Chi-Yung Cheng1,2, Shih-Hsuan Chen3, Chun-Hung Richard Lin2.   

Abstract

Prediction of functional outcome in ischemic stroke patients is useful for clinical decisions. Previous studies mostly elaborate on the prediction of favorable outcomes. Miserable outcomes, which are usually defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 5-6, should be considered as well before further invasive intervention. By using a machine learning algorithm, we aimed to develop a multiclass classification model for outcome prediction in acute ischemic stroke patients requiring reperfusion therapy. This was a retrospective study performed at a stroke medical center in Taiwan. Patients with acute ischemic stroke who visited between January 2016 and December 2019 and who were candidates for reperfusion therapy were included. Clinical outcomes were classified as favorable outcome, intermediate outcome, and miserable outcome. We developed four different multiclass machine learning models (Logistic Regression, Supportive Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Extreme Gradient Boosting) to predict clinical outcomes and compared their performance to the DRAGON score. A sample of 590 patients was included in this study. Of them, 180 (30.5%) had favorable outcomes and 152 (25.8%) had miserable outcomes. All selected machine learning models outperformed the DRAGON score on accuracy of outcome prediction (Logistic Regression: 0.70, Supportive Vector Machine: 0.67, Random Forest: 0.69, and Extreme Gradient Boosting: 0.67, vs. DRAGON: 0.51, p < 0.001). Among all selected models, Logistic Regression also had a better performance than the DRAGON score on positive predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity. Compared with the DRAGON score, the multiclass machine learning approach showed better performance on the prediction of the 3-month functional outcome of acute ischemic stroke patients requiring reperfusion therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute ischemic stroke; machine learning; multiclass classification; outcome prediction; reperfusion therapy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33419013      PMCID: PMC7825282          DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11010080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)        ISSN: 2075-4418


  19 in total

1.  Machine Learning-Based Model for Prediction of Outcomes in Acute Stroke.

Authors:  JoonNyung Heo; Jihoon G Yoon; Hyungjong Park; Young Dae Kim; Hyo Suk Nam; Ji Hoe Heo
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients.

Authors:  J C van Swieten; P J Koudstaal; M C Visser; H J Schouten; J van Gijn
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. ASPECTS Study Group. Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score.

Authors:  P A Barber; A M Demchuk; J Zhang; A M Buchan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-05-13       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Deep Learning in the Prediction of Ischaemic Stroke Thrombolysis Functional Outcomes: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Stephen Bacchi; Toby Zerner; Luke Oakden-Rayner; Timothy Kleinig; Sandy Patel; Jim Jannes
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Functional outcome 3 months after stroke predicts long-term survival.

Authors:  Marie Eriksson; Bo Norrving; Andreas Terént; Birgitta Stegmayr
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 2.762

6.  ASTRAL, DRAGON and SEDAN scores predict stroke outcome more accurately than physicians.

Authors:  G Ntaios; F Gioulekas; V Papavasileiou; D Strbian; P Michel
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 6.089

7.  Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischaemic stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joanna M Wardlaw; Veronica Murray; Eivind Berge; Gregory del Zoppo; Peter Sandercock; Richard L Lindley; Geoff Cohen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Predicting Outcome of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Potential Value of Machine Learning Algorithms.

Authors:  Hendrikus J A van Os; Lucas A Ramos; Adam Hilbert; Matthijs van Leeuwen; Marianne A A van Walderveen; Nyika D Kruyt; Diederik W J Dippel; Ewout W Steyerberg; Irene C van der Schaaf; Hester F Lingsma; Wouter J Schonewille; Charles B L M Majoie; Silvia D Olabarriaga; Koos H Zwinderman; Esmee Venema; Henk A Marquering; Marieke J H Wermer
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  1 in total

1.  Dynamic Prediction of Mechanical Thrombectomy Outcome for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Yixing Hu; Tongtong Yang; Juan Zhang; Xixi Wang; Xiaoli Cui; Nihong Chen; Junshan Zhou; Fuping Jiang; Junrong Zhu; Jianjun Zou
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-07-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.