Literature DB >> 30890116

Machine Learning-Based Model for Prediction of Outcomes in Acute Stroke.

JoonNyung Heo1, Jihoon G Yoon2, Hyungjong Park1, Young Dae Kim1, Hyo Suk Nam1, Ji Hoe Heo1.   

Abstract

Background and Purpose- The prediction of long-term outcomes in ischemic stroke patients may be useful in treatment decisions. Machine learning techniques are being increasingly adapted for use in the medical field because of their high accuracy. This study investigated the applicability of machine learning techniques to predict long-term outcomes in ischemic stroke patients. Methods- This was a retrospective study using a prospective cohort that enrolled patients with acute ischemic stroke. Favorable outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale score 0, 1, or 2 at 3 months. We developed 3 machine learning models (deep neural network, random forest, and logistic regression) and compared their predictability. To evaluate the accuracy of the machine learning models, we also compared them to the Acute Stroke Registry and Analysis of Lausanne (ASTRAL) score. Results- A total of 2604 patients were included in this study, and 2043 (78%) of them had favorable outcomes. The area under the curve for the deep neural network model was significantly higher than that of the ASTRAL score (0.888 versus 0.839; P<0.001), while the areas under the curves of the random forest (0.857; P=0.136) and logistic regression (0.849; P=0.413) models were not significantly higher than that of the ASTRAL score. Using only the 6 variables that are used for the ASTRAL score, the performance of the machine learning models did not significantly differ from that of the ASTRAL score. Conclusions- Machine learning algorithms, particularly the deep neural network, can improve the prediction of long-term outcomes in ischemic stroke patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cerebral infarction; machine learning; medical decision making; neural networks; stroke

Year:  2019        PMID: 30890116     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  70 in total

1.  Artificial Intelligence in Neuroradiology: Current Status and Future Directions.

Authors:  Y W Lui; P D Chang; G Zaharchuk; D P Barboriak; A E Flanders; M Wintermark; C P Hess; C G Filippi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Integrative Analysis of Peripheral Blood Indices for the Renal Sinus Invasion Prediction of T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Ensemble Study Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models.

Authors:  Xin Li; Bo Liu; Peng Cui; Xingxing Zhao; Zhao Liu; Yanxiang Qi; Gangling Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  A Machine Learning Model Based on Health Records for Predicting Recurrence After Microwave Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Chao An; Hongcai Yang; Xiaoling Yu; Zhi-Yu Han; Zhigang Cheng; Fangyi Liu; Jianping Dou; Bing Li; Yansheng Li; Yichao Li; Jie Yu; Ping Liang
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2022-07-28

4.  Potential of machine learning to predict early ischemic events after carotid endarterectomy or stenting: a comparison with surgeon predictions.

Authors:  Kazuya Matsuo; Atsushi Fujita; Kohkichi Hosoda; Jun Tanaka; Taichiro Imahori; Taiji Ishii; Masaaki Kohta; Kazuhiro Tanaka; Yoichi Uozumi; Hidehito Kimura; Takashi Sasayama; Eiji Kohmura
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Prediction of Clinical Outcome in Patients with Large-Vessel Acute Ischemic Stroke: Performance of Machine Learning versus SPAN-100.

Authors:  B Jiang; G Zhu; Y Xie; J J Heit; H Chen; Y Li; V Ding; A Eskandari; P Michel; G Zaharchuk; M Wintermark
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Using Anti-Malondialdehyde Modified Peptide Autoantibodies to Import Machine Learning for Predicting Coronary Artery Stenosis in Taiwanese Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Yu-Cheng Hsu; I-Jung Tsai; Hung Hsu; Po-Wen Hsu; Ming-Hui Cheng; Ying-Li Huang; Jin-Hua Chen; Meng-Huan Lei; Ching-Yu Ling
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26

Review 7.  How to Improve the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke by Modern Technologies, Artificial Intelligence, and New Treatment Methods.

Authors:  Kamil Zeleňák; Antonín Krajina; Lukas Meyer; Jens Fiehler; Daniel Behme; Deniz Bulja; Jildaz Caroff; Amar Ajay Chotai; Valerio Da Ros; Jean-Christophe Gentric; Jeremy Hofmeister; Omar Kass-Hout; Özcan Kocatürk; Jeremy Lynch; Ernesto Pearson; Ivan Vukasinovic
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-27

8.  Deep learning-based identification of acute ischemic core and deficit from non-contrast CT and CTA.

Authors:  Chengyan Wang; Zhang Shi; Ming Yang; Lixiang Huang; Wenxing Fang; Li Jiang; Jing Ding; He Wang
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 6.960

9.  Machine learning models improve prediction of large vessel occlusion and mechanical thrombectomy candidacy in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Shon Thomas; Paula de la Pena; Liam Butler; Oguz Akbilgic; Daniel M Heiferman; Ravi Garg; Rick Gill; Joseph C Serrone
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 2.116

10.  Prediction model for thyrotoxic atrial fibrillation: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Daria Aleksandrovna Ponomartseva; Ilia Vladislavovich Derevitskii; Sergey Valerevich Kovalchuk; Alina Yurevna Babenko
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2021-07-11       Impact factor: 2.763

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.