Literature DB >> 33418998

Understanding the Variation within a Dietary Guideline Index Score to Identify the Priority Food Group Targets for Improving Diet Quality across Population Subgroups.

Gilly A Hendrie1, Greg Lyle2, Chelsea E Mauch1, Joyce Haddad1,3, Rebecca K Golley3.   

Abstract

Globally, population dietary intakes fall below the guideline recommendations and large-scale interventions have had modest success in improving diet quality. To inform the development of more targeted approaches, this study analysed the variations in self-reported data from an online survey of Australian adults collected between 2015 and 2020, to identify common combinations of low scoring components within a dietary guideline index. A low score was defined as meeting less than half the guideline recommendations (a score <50 out of 100). Among 230,575 adults, a single component analysis showed that 79.5% had a low score for discretionary choices, 72.2% for healthy fats and 70.8% for dairy. The combinations approach showed 83.0% of individuals had two to five low scoring components, with men, younger adults aged 18-30 years and individuals with obesity (BMI ≥ 30) more likely to have five or more. The most common dietary pattern combination included low scores for discretionary choices, dairy and healthy fats. There was a considerable but systematic variation in the low scoring components within the dietary patterns, suggesting that interventions with the flexibility to address particular combinations of key food groups across subgroups could be an effective and resource efficient way to improve diet quality in the population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Australia; diet quality; dietary index; dietary patterns; interventions; population health

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33418998      PMCID: PMC7825319          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18020378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  31 in total

1.  Americans do not meet federal dietary recommendations.

Authors:  Susan M Krebs-Smith; Patricia M Guenther; Amy F Subar; Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Kevin W Dodd
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 2.  Effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving dietary behaviours among people at higher risk of or with chronic non-communicable diseases: an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Sarah Browne; Silvia Minozzi; Cristina Bellisario; Mary Rose Sweeney; Davide Susta
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Discretionary intake among Australian adults: prevalence of intake, top food groups, time of consumption and its association with sociodemographic, lifestyle and adiposity measures.

Authors:  Flavia Fayet-Moore; Andrew McConnell; Tim Cassettari; Kate Tuck; Peter Petocz; Jean Kim
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 4.022

4.  Position of the academy of nutrition and dietetics: total diet approach to healthy eating.

Authors:  Jeanne H Freeland-Graves; Susan Nitzke
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.910

5.  Adjustment Factors Can Improve Estimates of Food Group Intake Assessed Using a Short Dietary Assessment Instrument.

Authors:  Gilly A Hendrie; Megan A Rebuli; Rebecca K Golley; Manny Noakes
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.910

6.  Effects on blood pressure of reduced dietary sodium and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research Group.

Authors:  F M Sacks; L P Svetkey; W M Vollmer; L J Appel; G A Bray; D Harsha; E Obarzanek; P R Conlin; E R Miller; D G Simons-Morton; N Karanja; P H Lin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-01-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Interventions to enhance adherence to dietary advice for preventing and managing chronic diseases in adults.

Authors:  Sophie Desroches; Annie Lapointe; Stéphane Ratté; Karine Gravel; France Légaré; Stéphane Turcotte
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28

Review 8.  Applications of the Healthy Eating Index for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Intervention Research: Considerations and Caveats.

Authors:  Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Jill Reedy; Susan M Krebs-Smith; TusaRebecca E Pannucci; Amy F Subar; Magdalena M Wilson; Jennifer L Lerman; Janet A Tooze
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.910

Review 9.  Can a small-changes approach help address the obesity epidemic? A report of the Joint Task Force of the American Society for Nutrition, Institute of Food Technologists, and International Food Information Council.

Authors:  James O Hill
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Evaluating Diet Quality of Canadian Adults Using Health Canada's Surveillance Tool Tier System: Findings from the 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey-Nutrition.

Authors:  Salma Hack; Mahsa Jessri; Mary R L'Abbé
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.