Literature DB >> 33417699

Dose-response modeling in high-throughput cancer drug screenings: an end-to-end approach.

Wesley Tansey1, Kathy Li2, Haoran Zhang3, Scott W Linderman4, Raul Rabadan5, David M Blei6, Chris H Wiggins7.   

Abstract

Personalized cancer treatments based on the molecular profile of a patient's tumor are an emerging and exciting class of treatments in oncology. As genomic tumor profiling is becoming more common, targeted treatments for specific molecular alterations are gaining traction. To discover new potential therapeutics that may apply to broad classes of tumors matching some molecular pattern, experimentalists and pharmacologists rely on high-throughput, in vitro screens of many compounds against many different cell lines. We propose a hierarchical Bayesian model of how cancer cell lines respond to drugs in these experiments and develop a method for fitting the model to real-world high-throughput screening data. Through a case study, the model is shown to capture nontrivial associations between molecular features and drug response, such as requiring both wild type TP53 and overexpression of MDM2 to be sensitive to Nutlin-3(a). In quantitative benchmarks, the model outperforms a standard approach in biology, with $\approx20\%$ lower predictive error on held out data. When combined with a conditional randomization testing procedure, the model discovers markers of therapeutic response that recapitulate known biology and suggest new avenues for investigation. All code for the article is publicly available at https://github.com/tansey/deep-dose-response.
© The Author 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; Dose–response modeling; Drug discovery; Empirical Bayes; High-throughput screening; Personalized medicine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 33417699      PMCID: PMC9007438          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.279


  27 in total

1.  Measurement error and the replication crisis.

Authors:  Eric Loken; Andrew Gelman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Drug response prediction by inferring pathway-response associations with kernelized Bayesian matrix factorization.

Authors:  Muhammad Ammad-Ud-Din; Suleiman A Khan; Disha Malani; Astrid Murumägi; Olli Kallioniemi; Tero Aittokallio; Samuel Kaski
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Inconsistency in large pharmacogenomic studies.

Authors:  Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Nehme El-Hachem; Nicolai Juul Birkbak; Andrew C Jin; Andrew H Beck; Hugo J W L Aerts; John Quackenbush
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Multilevel models improve precision and speed of IC50 estimates.

Authors:  Daniel J Vis; Lorenzo Bombardelli; Howard Lightfoot; Francesco Iorio; Mathew J Garnett; Lodewyk Fa Wessels
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 2.533

5.  Bayesian additive adaptive basis tensor product models for modeling high dimensional surfaces: an application to high-throughput toxicity testing.

Authors:  Matthew W Wheeler
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Assessment of pharmacogenomic agreement.

Authors:  Zhaleh Safikhani; Nehme El-Hachem; Rene Quevedo; Petr Smirnov; Anna Goldenberg; Nicolai Juul Birkbak; Christopher Mason; Christos Hatzis; Leming Shi; Hugo Jwl Aerts; John Quackenbush; Benjamin Haibe-Kains
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-05-09

7.  Identification and correction of spatial bias are essential for obtaining quality data in high-throughput screening technologies.

Authors:  Bogdan Mazoure; Robert Nadon; Vladimir Makarenkov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Chemical proteomic profiles of the BCR-ABL inhibitors imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib reveal novel kinase and nonkinase targets.

Authors:  Uwe Rix; Oliver Hantschel; Gerhard Dürnberger; Lily L Remsing Rix; Melanie Planyavsky; Nora V Fernbach; Ines Kaupe; Keiryn L Bennett; Peter Valent; Jacques Colinge; Thomas Köcher; Giulio Superti-Furga
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Machine learning prediction of cancer cell sensitivity to drugs based on genomic and chemical properties.

Authors:  Michael P Menden; Francesco Iorio; Mathew Garnett; Ultan McDermott; Cyril H Benes; Pedro J Ballester; Julio Saez-Rodriguez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Inhibition of the autocrine IL-6-JAK2-STAT3-calprotectin axis as targeted therapy for HR-/HER2+ breast cancers.

Authors:  Ruth Rodriguez-Barrueco; Jiyang Yu; Laura P Saucedo-Cuevas; Mireia Olivan; David Llobet-Navas; Preeti Putcha; Veronica Castro; Eva M Murga-Penas; Ana Collazo-Lorduy; Mireia Castillo-Martin; Mariano Alvarez; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Kevin Kalinsky; Matthew Maurer; Andrea Califano; Jose M Silva
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  2 in total

1.  bayesynergy: flexible Bayesian modelling of synergistic interaction effects in in vitro drug combination experiments.

Authors:  Leiv Rønneberg; Andrea Cremaschi; Robert Hanes; Jorrit M Enserink; Manuela Zucknick
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 11.622

2.  A regularized functional regression model enabling transcriptome-wide dosage-dependent association study of cancer drug response.

Authors:  Evanthia Koukouli; Dennis Wang; Frank Dondelinger; Juhyun Park
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.475

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.