Kurtis D Carlock1, Sanjit R Konda1,2, Isabella R Bianco1, Joseph D Zuckerman1, Kenneth A Egol3,4. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 301 E 17th St, Suite 1402, New York, NY, USA. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Jamaica, NY, USA. 3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 301 E 17th St, Suite 1402, New York, NY, USA. Kenneth.Egol@nyumc.org. 4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Jamaica, NY, USA. Kenneth.Egol@nyumc.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nonunion of fractures about the proximal humerus represents a rare and complex problem. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes following proximal humerus fracture (PHF) nonunion repair using a plate and screw construct with a direct comparison to those experienced following operative fixation of acute PHF using a plate and screw construct. METHODS: Two separate patient cohorts were included in this study. The first consisted of 16 patients diagnosed with a non-united PHF who underwent operative nonunion repair treated with a standard algorithmic approach. The comparison group consisted of 173 patients who achieved union following initial open reduction and internal fixation of an acute PHF treated with a proximal humerus locking plate construct. All patients had at least 12 months of postoperative follow-up. Outcomes were assessed for both groups using American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and postoperative shoulder range of motion (ROM). Statistical analyses were used to compare these outcome measures between the two cohorts. RESULTS: The nonunion repair cohort consisted of eleven surgical neck nonunions and five nonunions of both the surgical neck and greater tuberosity. Ten patients had undergone surgical treatment for their original fracture, while six were initially treated non-operatively. All patients had Boileau type 3 sequelae of their proximal humerus fracture. Union was achieved in all patients at a mean of 5.4 months following nonunion repair. Complications included hardware failure requiring revision in two patients (12.5%) and avascular necrosis requiring conversion to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty following union in one patient (6.3%). The nonunion repair and acute fracture cohorts did not differ with respect to mean ASES scores, VAS pain scores, or active shoulder ROM at any postoperative time point. CONCLUSION: Surgical repair of PHF nonunion is a viable treatment strategy that can lead to consistent bony healing with outcomes comparable to those of patients who achieve fracture union following initial surgical repair of an acute proximal humerus fracture. Surgeons should be cognizant of mechanical considerations that may lead to early failure.
BACKGROUND: Nonunion of fractures about the proximal humerus represents a rare and complex problem. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes following proximal humerus fracture (PHF) nonunion repair using a plate and screw construct with a direct comparison to those experienced following operative fixation of acute PHF using a plate and screw construct. METHODS: Two separate patient cohorts were included in this study. The first consisted of 16 patients diagnosed with a non-united PHF who underwent operative nonunion repair treated with a standard algorithmic approach. The comparison group consisted of 173 patients who achieved union following initial open reduction and internal fixation of an acute PHF treated with a proximal humerus locking plate construct. All patients had at least 12 months of postoperative follow-up. Outcomes were assessed for both groups using American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and postoperative shoulder range of motion (ROM). Statistical analyses were used to compare these outcome measures between the two cohorts. RESULTS: The nonunion repair cohort consisted of eleven surgical neck nonunions and five nonunions of both the surgical neck and greater tuberosity. Ten patients had undergone surgical treatment for their original fracture, while six were initially treated non-operatively. All patients had Boileau type 3 sequelae of their proximal humerus fracture. Union was achieved in all patients at a mean of 5.4 months following nonunion repair. Complications included hardware failure requiring revision in two patients (12.5%) and avascular necrosis requiring conversion to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty following union in one patient (6.3%). The nonunion repair and acute fracture cohorts did not differ with respect to mean ASES scores, VAS pain scores, or active shoulder ROM at any postoperative time point. CONCLUSION: Surgical repair of PHF nonunion is a viable treatment strategy that can lead to consistent bony healing with outcomes comparable to those of patients who achieve fracture union following initial surgical repair of an acute proximal humerus fracture. Surgeons should be cognizant of mechanical considerations that may lead to early failure.
Authors: Edwin R Cadet; Bob Yin; Brian Schulz; Christopher S Ahmad; Melvin P Rosenwasser Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 3.020
Authors: Antti P Launonen; Vesa Lepola; Aino Saranko; Tapio Flinkkilä; Minna Laitinen; Ville M Mattila Journal: Arch Osteoporos Date: 2015-02-13 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Gerard P Slobogean; Herman Johal; Kelly A Lefaivre; Norma J MacIntyre; Sheila Sprague; Taryn Scott; Pierre Guy; Peter A Cripton; Michael McKee; Mohit Bhandari Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2015-05-10 Impact factor: 2.362