Literature DB >> 33415544

Rapid movements in plants.

Hiroaki Mano1,2,3, Mitsuyasu Hasebe4,5.   

Abstract

Plant movements are generally slow, but some plant species have evolved the ability to move very rapidly at speeds comparable to those of animals. Whereas movement in animals relies on the contraction machinery of muscles, many plant movements use turgor pressure as the primary driving force together with secondarily generated elastic forces. The movement of stomata is the best-characterized model system for studying turgor-driven movement, and many gene products responsible for this movement, especially those related to ion transport, have been identified. Similar gene products were recently shown to function in the daily sleep movements of pulvini, the motor organs for macroscopic leaf movements. However, it is difficult to explain the mechanisms behind rapid multicellular movements as a simple extension of the mechanisms used for unicellular or slow movements. For example, water transport through plant tissues imposes a limit on the speed of plant movements, which becomes more severe as the size of the moving part increases. Rapidly moving traps in carnivorous plants overcome this limitation with the aid of the mechanical behaviors of their three-dimensional structures. In addition to a mechanism for rapid deformation, rapid multicellular movements also require a molecular system for rapid cell-cell communication, along with a mechanosensing system that initiates the response. Electrical activities similar to animal action potentials are found in many plant species, representing promising candidates for the rapid cell-cell signaling behind rapid movements, but the molecular entities of these electrical signals remain obscure. Here we review the current understanding of rapid plant movements with the aim of encouraging further biological studies into this fascinating, challenging topic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrical signal; Ion transport; Mechanosensing; Rapid movement; Structure; Water transport

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33415544      PMCID: PMC7817606          DOI: 10.1007/s10265-020-01243-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plant Res        ISSN: 0918-9440            Impact factor:   2.629


  95 in total

1.  Geometry and mechanics in the opening of chiral seed pods.

Authors:  Shahaf Armon; Efi Efrati; Raz Kupferman; Eran Sharon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  The action potential in mammalian central neurons.

Authors:  Bruce P Bean
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 3.  Thigmomorphogenesis: a complex plant response to mechano-stimulation.

Authors:  E Wassim Chehab; Elizabeth Eich; Janet Braam
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 6.992

4.  Rain-, wind-, and touch-induced expression of calmodulin and calmodulin-related genes in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  J Braam; R W Davis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-02-09       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Molecular evidence for the common origin of snap-traps among carnivorous plants.

Authors:  Kenneth M Cameron; Kenneth J Wurdack; Richard W Jobson
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.844

6.  Salt stress-induced Ca2+ waves are associated with rapid, long-distance root-to-shoot signaling in plants.

Authors:  Won-Gyu Choi; Masatsugu Toyota; Su-Hwa Kim; Richard Hilleary; Simon Gilroy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Molecular Evolution of Grass Stomata.

Authors:  Zhong-Hua Chen; Guang Chen; Fei Dai; Yizhou Wang; Adrian Hills; Yong-Ling Ruan; Guoping Zhang; Peter J Franks; Eviatar Nevo; Michael R Blatt
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 18.313

8.  Stomatal Opening Involves Polar, Not Radial, Stiffening Of Guard Cells.

Authors:  Ross Carter; Hugh Woolfenden; Alice Baillie; Sam Amsbury; Sarah Carroll; Eleanor Healicon; Spyros Sovatzoglou; Sioban Braybrook; Julie E Gray; Jamie Hobbs; Richard J Morris; Andrew J Fleming
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  A single touch can provide sufficient mechanical stimulation to trigger Venus flytrap closure.

Authors:  Jan T Burri; Eashan Saikia; Nino F Läubli; Hannes Vogler; Falk K Wittel; Markus Rüggeberg; Hans J Herrmann; Ingo Burgert; Bradley J Nelson; Ueli Grossniklaus
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  The Venus Flytrap Dionaea muscipula Counts Prey-Induced Action Potentials to Induce Sodium Uptake.

Authors:  Jennifer Böhm; Sönke Scherzer; Elzbieta Krol; Ines Kreuzer; Katharina von Meyer; Christian Lorey; Thomas D Mueller; Lana Shabala; Isabel Monte; Roberto Solano; Khaled A S Al-Rasheid; Heinz Rennenberg; Sergey Shabala; Erwin Neher; Rainer Hedrich
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Plant cell mechanobiology: Greater than the sum of its parts.

Authors:  Jennette M Codjoe; Kari Miller; Elizabeth S Haswell
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 12.085

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.