Literature DB >> 27776931

Molecular Evolution of Grass Stomata.

Zhong-Hua Chen1, Guang Chen2, Fei Dai2, Yizhou Wang3, Adrian Hills3, Yong-Ling Ruan4, Guoping Zhang2, Peter J Franks5, Eviatar Nevo6, Michael R Blatt3.   

Abstract

Grasses began to diversify in the late Cretaceous Period and now dominate more than one third of global land area, including three-quarters of agricultural land. We hypothesize that their success is likely attributed to the evolution of highly responsive stomata capable of maximizing productivity in rapidly changing environments. Grass stomata harness the active turgor control mechanisms present in stomata of more ancient plant lineages, maximizing several morphological and developmental features to ensure rapid responses to environmental inputs. The evolutionary development of grass stomata appears to have been a gradual progression. Therefore, understanding the complex structures, developmental events, regulatory networks, and combinations of ion transporters necessary to drive rapid stomatal movement may inform future efforts towards breeding new crop varieties.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  comparative genomics; guard cell modeling; ion transporters; stomatal development; stomatal evolution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27776931     DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Plant Sci        ISSN: 1360-1385            Impact factor:   18.313


  51 in total

1.  Permanently open stomata of aquatic angiosperms display modified cellulose crystallinity patterns.

Authors:  Ilana Shtein; Zoë A Popper; Smadar Harpaz-Saad
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2017-07-18

Review 2.  Evolution of the Stomatal Regulation of Plant Water Content.

Authors:  Timothy J Brodribb; Scott A M McAdam
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Stomatal Function across Temporal and Spatial Scales: Deep-Time Trends, Land-Atmosphere Coupling and Global Models.

Authors:  Peter J Franks; Joseph A Berry; Danica L Lombardozzi; Gordon B Bonan
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 4.  Leaf Hydraulic Architecture and Stomatal Conductance: A Functional Perspective.

Authors:  Fulton E Rockwell; N Michele Holbrook
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Abscisic acid (ABA) and key proteins in its perception and signaling pathways are ancient, but their roles have changed through time.

Authors:  Frances C Sussmilch; Nadia M Atallah; Timothy J Brodribb; Jo Ann Banks; Scott A M McAdam
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2017-08-25

Review 6.  Origins and Evolution of Stomatal Development.

Authors:  Caspar C C Chater; Robert S Caine; Andrew J Fleming; Julie E Gray
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Cortical microtubules and fusicoccin response in clustered stomatal guard cells induced by sucrose solution immersion.

Authors:  Kae Akita; Seiichiro Hasezawa; Takumi Higaki
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2018-04-03

8.  Archetypal Roles of an Abscisic Acid Receptor in Drought and Sugar Responses in Liverworts.

Authors:  Akida Jahan; Kenji Komatsu; Mai Wakida-Sekiya; Mayuka Hiraide; Keisuke Tanaka; Rumi Ohtake; Taishi Umezawa; Tsukasa Toriyama; Akihisa Shinozawa; Izumi Yotsui; Yoichi Sakata; Daisuke Takezawa
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 9.  The Membrane Transport System of the Guard Cell and Its Integration for Stomatal Dynamics.

Authors:  Mareike Jezek; Michael R Blatt
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 10.  Temporal Dynamics of Stomatal Behavior: Modeling and Implications for Photosynthesis and Water Use.

Authors:  Silvere R M Vialet-Chabrand; Jack S A Matthews; Lorna McAusland; Michael R Blatt; Howard Griffiths; Tracy Lawson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.