Rahul N Khurana1, Neal L Oden2, Paul C VanVeldhuisen3, Ingrid U Scott4, Barbara A Blodi5, Michael S Ip6. 1. Northern California Retina Vitreous Associates, Mountain View, CA, USA. 2. The Emmes Company, LLC, 401 N. Washington Street, Suite 700, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA. 3. The Emmes Company, LLC, 401 N. Washington Street, Suite 700, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA. score2@emmes.com. 4. Departments of Ophthalmology and Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA. 5. University of Wisconsin Fundus Photograph Reading Center, Madison, WI, USA. 6. Doheny Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess whether early visual acuity letter score change from baseline (ΔVALS) and early spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) measures of center point thickness (CPT) are associated with later ΔVALS in eyes with macular edema due to central or hemiretinal vein occlusion treated with intravitreal aflibercept or bevacizumab. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of 362 participants. RESULTS: Considered separately at month 3, CPT (categorized as ≤ 300 μm, > 300 μm) and ΔVALS (categorized as < 5, 5-9, ≥ 10) are predictive of ΔVALS at month 6 (aflibercept: P = 0.02 for CPT and P < 0.0001 for ΔVALS; bevacizumab: P = 0.007 for CPT and P < 0.0001 for ΔVALS) and, except for CPT in the bevacizumab arm, also predictive of ΔVALS at month 12 (aflibercept: P = 0.03 for CPT and P < 0.0001 for ΔVALS; bevacizumab: P = 0.18 for CPT and P < 0.0001 for ΔVALS). Month 3 predictors are also associated with average ΔVALS from months 4 to 12 (CPT P = 0.01 in the aflibercept arm, P = 0.02 in the bevacizumab arm; ΔVALS > 10 versus < 5; P < 0.001 for both aflibercept and bevacizumab). When month 3 measures are considered jointly, ΔVALS effect remains significant for average ΔVALS from months 4 to 12 (aflibercept: P = 0.002; bevacizumab: P < 0.0001) but not CPT (aflibercept: P = 0.18; bevacizumab: P = 0.22). CONCLUSION: While both month 3 ΔVALS and CPT are predictive of ΔVALS after month 3 through month 12, early ΔVALS has a stronger relationship than CPT with later ΔVALS. SCORE2 registration number is NCT01969708.
PURPOSE: To assess whether early visual acuity letter score change from baseline (ΔVALS) and early spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) measures of center point thickness (CPT) are associated with later ΔVALS in eyes with macular edema due to central or hemiretinal vein occlusion treated with intravitreal aflibercept or bevacizumab. METHODS: Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of 362 participants. RESULTS: Considered separately at month 3, CPT (categorized as ≤ 300 μm, > 300 μm) and ΔVALS (categorized as < 5, 5-9, ≥ 10) are predictive of ΔVALS at month 6 (aflibercept: P = 0.02 for CPT and P < 0.0001 for ΔVALS; bevacizumab: P = 0.007 for CPT and P < 0.0001 for ΔVALS) and, except for CPT in the bevacizumab arm, also predictive of ΔVALS at month 12 (aflibercept: P = 0.03 for CPT and P < 0.0001 for ΔVALS; bevacizumab: P = 0.18 for CPT and P < 0.0001 for ΔVALS). Month 3 predictors are also associated with average ΔVALS from months 4 to 12 (CPT P = 0.01 in the aflibercept arm, P = 0.02 in the bevacizumab arm; ΔVALS > 10 versus < 5; P < 0.001 for both aflibercept and bevacizumab). When month 3 measures are considered jointly, ΔVALS effect remains significant for average ΔVALS from months 4 to 12 (aflibercept: P = 0.002; bevacizumab: P < 0.0001) but not CPT (aflibercept: P = 0.18; bevacizumab: P = 0.22). CONCLUSION: While both month 3 ΔVALS and CPT are predictive of ΔVALS after month 3 through month 12, early ΔVALS has a stronger relationship than CPT with later ΔVALS. SCORE2 registration number is NCT01969708.
Authors: Jeffrey S Heier; Peter A Campochiaro; Linda Yau; Zhengrong Li; Namrata Saroj; Roman G Rubio; Phillip Lai Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Ingrid U Scott; Paul C VanVeldhuisen; Michael S Ip; Barbara A Blodi; Neal L Oden; Jacqueline King; Andrew N Antoszyk; Mark A Peters; Michael Tolentino Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Victor H Gonzalez; Joanna Campbell; Nancy M Holekamp; Szilárd Kiss; Anat Loewenstein; Albert J Augustin; Julia Ma; Allen C Ho; Vaishali Patel; Scott M Whitcup; Pravin U Dugel Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2016-09-17 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: David M Brown; Peter A Campochiaro; Robert B Bhisitkul; Allen C Ho; Sarah Gray; Namrata Saroj; Anthony P Adamis; Roman G Rubio; Wendy Yee Murahashi Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Peter A Campochiaro; David M Brown; Carl C Awh; S Young Lee; Sarah Gray; Namrata Saroj; Wendy Yee Murahashi; Roman G Rubio Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Ingrid U Scott; Paul C VanVeldhuisen; Michael S Ip; Barbara A Blodi; Neal L Oden; Maria Figueroa; Pravin U Dugel Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: David J Browning; Adam R Glassman; Lloyd Paul Aiello; Roy W Beck; David M Brown; Donald S Fong; Neil M Bressler; Ronald P Danis; James L Kinyoun; Quan Dong Nguyen; Abdhish R Bhavsar; Justin Gottlieb; Dante J Pieramici; Michael E Rauser; Rajendra S Apte; Jennifer I Lim; Päivi H Miskala Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2006-11-21 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: David M Brown; Jeffrey S Heier; W Lloyd Clark; David S Boyer; Robert Vitti; Alyson J Berliner; Oliver Zeitz; Rupert Sandbrink; Xiaoping Zhu; Julia A Haller Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2012-12-04 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Susan B Bressler; Allison R Edwards; Kakarla V Chalam; Neil M Bressler; Adam R Glassman; Glenn J Jaffe; Michele Melia; David D Saggau; Oren Z Plous Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Susan B Bressler; Isoken Odia; Maureen G Maguire; Dilsher S Dhoot; Adam R Glassman; Lee M Jampol; Dennis M Marcus; Sharon D Solomon; Jennifer K Sun Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 8.253