Literature DB >> 22301066

Ranibizumab for macular edema due to retinal vein occlusions: long-term follow-up in the HORIZON trial.

Jeffrey S Heier1, Peter A Campochiaro, Linda Yau, Zhengrong Li, Namrata Saroj, Roman G Rubio, Phillip Lai.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess long-term safety and efficacy of intraocular ranibizumab injections in patients with macular edema after retinal vein occlusion (RVO).
DESIGN: Open-label extension trial of the 12-month Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Macular Edema following Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety (BRAVO) and Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Study: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety (CRUISE) trials. PARTICIPANTS: We included 304 patients who completed BRAVO and 304 patients who completed CRUISE.
METHODS: Patients were seen at least every 3 months and given an intraocular injection of 0.5 mg ranibizumab if they met prespecified retreatment criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were incidence and severity of ocular and nonocular adverse events (AEs). Key efficacy outcomes included mean change from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter score by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol and central foveal thickness.
RESULTS: In patients who completed month 12, the mean number of injections (excluding month 12 injection) in the sham/0.5-, 0.3/0.5-, and 0.5-mg groups was 2.0, 2.4, and 2.1 (branch RVO) and 2.9, 3.8, and 3.5 (central RVO), respectively. The incidence of study eye ocular serious AEs (SAEs) and SAEs potentially related to systemic vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition across treatment arms was 2% to 9% and 1% to 6%, respectively. The mean change from baseline BCVA letter score at month 12 in branch RVO patients was 0.9 (sham/0.5 mg), -2.3 (0.3/0.5 mg), and -0.7 (0.5 mg), respectively. The mean change from baseline BCVA at month 12 in central RVO patients was -4.2 (sham/0.5 mg), -5.2 (0.3/0.5 mg), and -4.1 (0.5 mg), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: No new safety events were identified with long-term use of ranibizumab; rates of SAEs potentially related to treatment were consistent with prior ranibizumab trials. Reduced follow-up and fewer ranibizumab injections in the second year of treatment were associated with a decline in vision in central RVO patients, but vision in branch RVO patients remained stable. Results suggest that during the second year of ranibizumab treatment of RVO patients, follow-up and injections should be individualized and, on average, central RVO patients may require more frequent follow-up than every 3 months.
Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22301066     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  135 in total

1.  The Royal College of Ophthalmologists Guidelines on retinal vein occlusions: executive summary.

Authors:  S Sivaprasad; W M Amoaku; P Hykin
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Predictive factors for recurrence of macular edema after successful intravitreal bevacizumab therapy in branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Rika Yamada; Akihiro Nishida; Masataka Shimozono; Takanori Kameda; Noriko Miyamoto; Michiko Mandai; Yasuo Kurimoto
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  Central retinal vein occlusion: modifying current treatment protocols.

Authors:  M Ashraf; A A R Souka; R P Singh
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Outcomes of switching treatment to aflibercept in patients with macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion refractory to ranibizumab.

Authors:  Vasileios Konidaris; Zahra Al-Hubeshy; Konstantinos T Tsaousis; Konstantina Gorgoli; Somnath Banerjee; Theodoros Empeslidis
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 5.  [Statement of the Professional Association of Ophthalmologists (BVA), the German Ophthalmological Society (DOG) and the Retinological Society (RG) on intravitreal treatment of vision-reducing macular edema by retinal vein occlusion : Treatment strategies, status 24 April 2018].

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Time required for navigated macular laser photocoagulation treatment with the Navilas.

Authors:  Michael D Ober; Marcus Kernt; Marco A Cortes; Igor Kozak
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Retinal vein occlusion and the use of a dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex) in its treatment.

Authors:  Dan Călugăru; Mihai Călugăru
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Response to: 'Comment on Central retinal vein occlusion: modifying current treatment protocols'.

Authors:  M Ashraf; A A R Souka; R P Singh
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 9.  Clinical pharmacology of intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs.

Authors:  Stefano Fogli; Marzia Del Re; Eleonora Rofi; Chiara Posarelli; Michele Figus; Romano Danesi
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Intravitreal ranibizumab versus aflibercept versus bevacizumab for macular oedema due to central retinal vein occlusion: the LEAVO non-inferiority three-arm RCT.

Authors:  Philip Hykin; A Toby Prevost; Sobha Sivaprasad; Joana C Vasconcelos; Caroline Murphy; Joanna Kelly; Jayashree Ramu; Abualbishr Alshreef; Laura Flight; Rebekah Pennington; Barry Hounsome; Ellen Lever; Andrew Metry; Edith Poku; Yit Yang; Simon P Harding; Andrew Lotery; Usha Chakravarthy; John Brazier
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 4.014

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.