Literature DB >> 33414879

A Comparison of United States Marine Corps Physical Fitness Test and Combat Fitness Test Results.

Marc Keefer1, Mark Debeliso1.   

Abstract

The United States Marines Corps (USMC) have installed a Physical Fitness Test (PFT) to measure physical fitness levels and a Combat Fitness Test (CFT) to assess a Marine's functional fitness as it relates to the demands of combat operations. The PFT involves three events; pull-ups/push-ups (PU), two-minute abdominal crunches/sit-ups (AC), and a timed three-mile run (RUN). The CFT also involves three events; Movement to Contact (MTC), two-minute Ammunition Lift (AL), and Maneuver-Under-Fire (MANUF). It is of interest to determine if the PFT and CFT are both necessary. As such, the purpose of this study was to determine the degree of relationships between PFT (PU, AC, RUN, and total) and CFT (MTC, AL, MANUF, and total) scores of active duty Marines. The PFT and CFT scores from 19,678 active duty enlisted USMC males (age 22.5±1.3 years, height 1.77±0.07 m, body mass 79.4±10.3 kg) were analyzed. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were calculated between the PFT and CFT total scores as well as individual events. The PFT mean±sd scores were as follows: PU=18.0±5.0 (pull-ups), AC=111.2±9.0 (repetitions), RUN=1377.0±131.4 sec, PFT total=249.6±29.6. The CFT mean±sd scores were as follows: MTC=172.5±16.3 sec, AL=113.2±10.4 repetitions, MANUF=138.3±17.2 sec, CFT total=271.6±25.6. Moderate significant (p<0.01) correlations were found between: the PFT total and MTC (r=-0.47), PFT total and MANUF (r=-0.42), PFT total and CFT total (r=0.50), RUN and MTC (r=0.46), RUN and CFT total (r=-0.43), & PU and CFT total (r=0.41). Other correlations between variables yielded "no to low" association but were also significant due to the large sample size. Within the parameters of this study, PFT and CFT event scores demonstrated no to moderate correlations suggesting that different fitness characteristics are being assessed and supports the need for both the PFT and CFT assessments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  USMC; military; readiness

Year:  2020        PMID: 33414879      PMCID: PMC7745917     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci        ISSN: 1939-795X


  16 in total

1.  Executive Summary From the National Strength and Conditioning Association's Second Blue Ribbon Panel on Military Physical Readiness: Military Physical Performance Testing.

Authors:  Bradley C Nindl; Brent A Alvar; Jason R Dudley; Mike W Favre; Gerard J Martin; Marilyn A Sharp; Brad J Warr; Mark D Stephenson; William J Kraemer
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

Review 3.  The Warrior Model for Human Performance Optimization.

Authors:  Timothy C Sell; Robert H Lutz; Mallory S Faherty
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rev       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Exercise Testing of Muscle Strength in Military.

Authors:  Pantelis T Nikolaidis; Konstantinos-Georgios Papaioannou; Thomas Rosemann; Beat Knechtle
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 5.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Predictors of Military Task Performance: Maximal Lift Capacity.

Authors:  Jay R Hydren; Alexander S Borges; Marilyn A Sharp
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Mission essential fitness: comparison of functional circuit training to traditional Army physical training for active duty military.

Authors:  Katie M Heinrich; Vincent Spencer; Nathanael Fehl; Walker S Carlos Poston
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.437

7.  Investigating the correlation of the U.S. Air Force Physical Fitness Test to combat-based fitness: a women-only study.

Authors:  Tarah Mitchell; Edward D White; Daniel Ritschel
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 8.  Physical Training Strategies for Military Women's Performance Optimization in Combat-Centric Occupations.

Authors:  Bradley C Nindl
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Human Performance Optimization Metrics: Consensus Findings, Gaps, and Recommendations for Future Research.

Authors:  Bradley C Nindl; Dianna P Jaffin; Michael N Dretsch; Samuel N Cheuvront; Nancy J Wesensten; Michael L Kent; Neil E Grunberg; Joseph R Pierce; Erin S Barry; Jonathan M Scott; Andrew J Young; Francis G OʼConnor; Patricia A Deuster
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  A longitudinal analysis of the U.S. Air Force reserve officers' training corps physical fitness assessment.

Authors:  Cameron S Mackey; Jason M DeFreitas
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2019-09-23
View more
  2 in total

1.  Tactical Masters Athletes: BMI Index Classifications.

Authors:  Marc Keefer; Joe Walsh; Kent Adams; Mike Climstein; Chad Harris; Mark DeBeliso
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-09

2.  Resilience, Psychological Stress, Physical Activity, and BMI among United States Air National Guardsmen: The COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Nicole Ligeza; Abigail Larson; Mark DeBeliso
Journal:  J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2022-01-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.