Literature DB >> 26506191

Executive Summary From the National Strength and Conditioning Association's Second Blue Ribbon Panel on Military Physical Readiness: Military Physical Performance Testing.

Bradley C Nindl1, Brent A Alvar, Jason R Dudley, Mike W Favre, Gerard J Martin, Marilyn A Sharp, Brad J Warr, Mark D Stephenson, William J Kraemer.   

Abstract

The National Strength and Conditioning Association's tactical strength and conditioning program sponsored the second Blue Ribbon Panel on military physical readiness: military physical performance testing, April 18-19, 2013, Norfolk, VA. This meeting brought together a total of 20 subject matter experts (SMEs) from the U.S. Air Force, Army, Marine Corps, Navy, and academia representing practitioners, operators, researchers, and policy advisors to discuss the current state of physical performance testing across the Armed Services. The SME panel initially rated 9 common military tasks (jumping over obstacles, moving with agility, carrying heavy loads, dragging heavy loads, running long distances, moving quickly over short distances, climbing over obstacles, lifting heavy objects, loading equipment) by the degree to which health-related fitness components (e.g., aerobic fitness, muscular strength, muscular endurance, flexibility, and body composition) and skill-related fitness components (e.g., muscular power, agility, balance, coordination, speed, and reaction time) were required to accomplish these tasks. A scale from 1 to 10 (10 being highest) was used. Muscular strength, power, and endurance received the highest rating scores. Panel consensus concluded that (a) selected fitness components (particularly for skill-related fitness components) are currently not being assessed by the military; (b) field-expedient options to measure both health-based and skill-based fitness components are currently available; and (c) 95% of the panel concurred that all services should consider a tier II test focused on both health-related and skill-related fitness components based on occupational, functional, and tactical military performance requirements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26506191     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  10 in total

1.  A Comparison of United States Marine Corps Physical Fitness Test and Combat Fitness Test Results.

Authors:  Marc Keefer; Mark Debeliso
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-12-01

2.  Significantly Increased Odds of Reporting Previous Shoulder Injuries in Female Marines Based on Larger Magnitude Shoulder Rotator Bilateral Strength Differences.

Authors:  Shawn R Eagle; Chris Connaboy; Bradley C Nindl; Katelyn F Allison
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-02-21

3.  Physical Fitness and Activity Levels among Chinese People with Schizophrenia: A Cross-Sectional Study with Matched Case-Control Comparison.

Authors:  Daniel Bressington; Yan Li; Sabina Hulbert; Yim Wah Mak
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Reliability and agreement of the IsoKai isokinetic lift test - A test used for admission to the Swedish Armed Forces.

Authors:  Tony Bohman; Matthias Tegern; Alexandra Halvarsson; Lisbet Broman; Helena Larsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Monitoring Neuromuscular Performance in Military Personnel.

Authors:  Justin J Merrigan; Jason D Stone; Andrew G Thompson; W Guy Hornsby; Joshua A Hagen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Resilience, Psychological Stress, Physical Activity, and BMI among United States Air National Guardsmen: The COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Nicole Ligeza; Abigail Larson; Mark DeBeliso
Journal:  J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2022-01-31

7.  Integration of strength training into UK Defence Rehabilitation practice: current trends and future challenges.

Authors:  Peter Ladlow; D Conway; D Hayhurst; C Suffield; R P Cassidy; R J Coppack
Journal:  BMJ Mil Health       Date:  2020-10-21

8.  Body Composition of Female Air Force Personnel: A Comparative Study of Aircrew, Airplane, and Helicopter Pilots.

Authors:  Álvaro Bustamante-Sánchez; Pantelis T Nikolaidis; Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  Relationship between a Maximum Plank Assessment and Fitness, Health Behaviors, and Moods in Tactical Athletes: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Megan Sax van der Weyden; Michael Toczko; Marcie Fyock-Martin; Joel Martin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.614

10.  Effects of Combined Strength and Endurance Training on Body Composition, Physical Fitness, and Serum Hormones During a 6-Month Crisis Management Operation.

Authors:  Kai Pihlainen; Heikki Kyröläinen; Matti Santtila; Tommi Ojanen; Jani Raitanen; Keijo Häkkinen
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.415

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.