Literature DB >> 33413452

The English and Chinese language versions of the Short Form 12-item Health Survey are equivalent.

Daniel Y T Fong1, Janet Y H Wong2, Edmond P H Choi1, K F Lam3, C Kwok4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Short Form 12-item Health Survey (SF-12v2) was originally developed in English, but it is also available in Hong Kong (HK) Chinese. While both language versions had their measurement properties well assessed in their respective populations, their measurement invariance in scores has not been examined. Therefore, we aimed to assess their measurement invariance.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study on individuals aged 18 years or older at a university campus. Those who were bilingual in English and Chinese were randomly assigned to self-complete either the standard English or the HK Chinese SF-12v2. Measurement invariance of the two components and eight scales of the SF-12v2 was concluded if the corresponding 90% confidence interval (CI) for the difference between the two language versions entirely fell within the minimal clinically important difference of ± 3 units. Multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was also performed.
RESULTS: A total of 1013 participants completed the SF-12v2 (496 in English and 517 in HK Chinese), with a mean age of 22 years (Range 18-58), and 626 participants (62%) were female. There were no significant differences in demographics. Only the physical and mental components and the mental health (MH) scale had their 90% CIs (0.21 to 1.61, - 1.00 to 0.98, and - 0.86 to 2.84, respectively) completely fall within the ± 3 units. The multiple-group CFA showed partial strict invariance.
CONCLUSIONS: The English and HK Chinese versions of the SF-12v2 can be used in studies with their two components and MH scores pooled in the analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Confirmatory factor analysis; Equivalence range; Measurement invariance

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33413452      PMCID: PMC7791772          DOI: 10.1186/s12955-020-01653-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes        ISSN: 1477-7525            Impact factor:   3.186


  14 in total

1.  An assessment of the construct validity of the SF-12 summary scores across ethnic groups.

Authors:  C Jenkinson; T Chandola; A Coulter; S Bruster
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  2001-09

2.  Is the standard SF-12 health survey valid and equivalent for a Chinese population?

Authors:  Cindy L K Lam; Eileen Y Y Tse; Barbara Gandek
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  The SF-36 summary scales were valid, reliable, and equivalent in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Cindy L K Lam; Eileen Y Y Tse; Barbara Gandek; Daniel Y T Fong
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  The Short Form-12 Health Survey was a valid instrument in Chinese adolescents.

Authors:  Daniel Y T Fong; Cindy L K Lam; Kwok Kei Mak; Wing Sze Lo; Yuen Kwan Lai; Sai Yin Ho; Tai Hing Lam
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Measurement invariance of the SF-12 across European-American, Latina, and African-American postpartum women.

Authors:  Tamer F Desouky; Pablo A Mora; Elizabeth A Howell
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Using quantitative methods within the Universalist model framework to explore the cross-cultural equivalence of patient-reported outcome instruments.

Authors:  Antoine Regnault; Michael Herdman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  The Equivalence and Difference between the English and Chinese Language Versions of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status.

Authors:  Rachel Phillips; Yin Bun Cheung; Simon Lowes Collinson; May-Li Lim; Audrey Ling; Lei Feng; Tze-Pin Ng
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.535

8.  The equivalence and difference between the English and Chinese versions of two major, cancer-specific, health-related quality-of-life questionnaires.

Authors:  Yin-Bun Cheung; Julian Thumboo; Cynthia Goh; Kei-Siong Khoo; William Che; Joseph Wee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Measurement Invariance Conventions and Reporting: The State of the Art and Future Directions for Psychological Research.

Authors:  Diane L Putnick; Marc H Bornstein
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2016-06-29

10.  Physical activity for cancer survivors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Daniel Y T Fong; Judy W C Ho; Bryant P H Hui; Antoinette M Lee; Duncan J Macfarlane; Sharron S K Leung; Ester Cerin; Wynnie Y Y Chan; Ivy P F Leung; Sharon H S Lam; Aliki J Taylor; Kar-keung Cheng
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-01-30
View more
  2 in total

1.  Average and individual differences between the 12-item MOS Short-form Health Survey version 2 (SF-12 V.2) and the veterans RAND 12-item Health Survey (VR-12) in the Chinese population.

Authors:  Daniel Y T Fong; Bobo K Y Chan; Sha Li; C H Wan; Lewis E Kazis
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 3.077

2.  Fatigue have impact on the sexual problems in Chinese females with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Lijuan Zhang; Beiwen Wu; Junna Ye
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 2.742

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.