Literature DB >> 33413284

Rationale and design of the validation of bladder health instrument for evaluation in women (VIEW) protocol.

Emily S Lukacz1,2, Melissa L Constantine3, Lisa Kane Low4, Jerry L Lowder5, Alayne D Markland6,7, Elizabeth R Mueller8, Diane K Newman9, Leslie M Rickey10, Todd Rockwood11, Kyle Rudser3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bladder health is an understudied state and difficult to measure due to lack of valid and reliable instruments. While condition specific questionnaires assess presence, severity and degree of bother from lower urinary tract symptoms, the absence of symptoms is insufficient to assume bladder health. This study describes the methodology used to validate a novel bladder health instrument to measure the spectrum of bladder health from very healthy to very unhealthy in population based and clinical research.
METHODS: Three samples of women are being recruited: a sample from a nationally representative general population and two locally recruited clinical center samples-women with a targeted range of symptom severity and type, and a postpartum group. The general population sample includes 694 women, 18 years or older, randomly selected from a US Postal delivery sequence file. Participants are randomly assigned to electronic or paper versions of the bladder health instrument along with a battery of criterion questionnaires and a demographic survey; followed by a retest or a two-day voiding symptom diary. A total of 354 women around 7 clinical centers are being recruited across a spectrum of self-reported symptoms and randomized to mode of completion. They complete the two-day voiding symptom diary as well as a one-day frequency volume diary prior to an in-person evaluation with a standardized cough stress test, non-invasive urine flowmetry, chemical urine analysis and post void residual measurement. Independent judge ratings of bladder health are obtained by interview with a qualified health care provider. A total of 154 postpartum women recruited around 6 of the centers are completing similar assessments within 6-12 weeks postpartum. Dimensional validity will be evaluated using factor analysis and principal components analysis with varimax rotation, and internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha. Criterion validity will be assessed using multitrait-multimethod matrix including correlations across multiple data sources and multiple types of measures. DISCUSSION: We aim to validate a bladder health instrument to measure the degree of bladder health within the general population and among women (including postpartum) recruited from local clinical centers. Trial registration NCT04016298 Posted July 11, 2019 ( https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04016298?cond=bladder+health&draw=2&rank=1 ).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder; Health; Instrument; Measurement; Questionnaire; Scale; Validation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33413284      PMCID: PMC7789348          DOI: 10.1186/s12905-020-01136-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Womens Health        ISSN: 1472-6874            Impact factor:   2.809


  28 in total

1.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.

Authors:  D T CAMPBELL; D W FISKE
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1959-03       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Coming of age of prevention science. Comments on the 1994 National Institute of Mental Health-Institute of Medicine Prevention reports.

Authors:  K Heller
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1996-11

4.  Voiding dynamics in women: a comparison of pressure-flow studies between asymptomatic and incontinent women.

Authors:  Gary E Lemack; Adam G Baseman; Philippe E Zimmern
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  The Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire: development and psychometric testing.

Authors:  S Jackson; J Donovan; S Brookes; S Eckford; L Swithinbank; P Abrams
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1996-06

Review 6.  Symptom severity and QOL scales for urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Michelle J Naughton; Jenny Donovan; Xavier Badia; Jacques Corcos; Momokazu Gotoh; Con Kelleher; Bertrand Lukacs; Christine Shaw
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs.

Authors:  C A McHorney; J E Ware; A E Raczek
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 8.  Effect of pelvic floor muscle training during pregnancy and after childbirth on prevention and treatment of urinary incontinence: a systematic review.

Authors:  Siv Mørkved; Kari Bø
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 13.800

9.  A critical look at transition ratings.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; Geoffrey R Norman; Elizabeth F Juniper; Lauren E Griffith
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Mode effects in the center for epidemiologic studies depression (CES-D) scale: personal digital assistant vs. paper and pencil administration.

Authors:  Richard J Swartz; Carl de Moor; Karon F Cook; Rachel T Fouladi; Karen Basen-Engquist; Cathy Eng; Cindy L Carmack Taylor
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 3.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.