Literature DB >> 33411911

Protein foods from animal sources, incident cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: a substitution analysis.

Victor W Zhong1,2, Norrina B Allen2, Philip Greenland2, Mercedes R Carnethon2, Hongyan Ning2, John T Wilkins2,3, Donald M Lloyd-Jones2, Linda Van Horn2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Protein-rich foods are major parts of the human diet and are highly heterogeneous in nutrient composition and health effects. Designing healthy diets for disease prevention requires careful consideration of substituting unhealthier protein foods with healthier protein foods.
METHODS: This was a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies of 29 682 US participants. Data were collected in 1985-2016. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 30-year absolute risk differences (ARDs) were calculated for the associations between simultaneous substitution of one or more animal protein foods with other animal or plant protein foods at various amounts, and incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: Substituting eggs, processed meat, unprocessed red meat or poultry with nuts, whole grains, legumes or fish was associated with lower risks of incident CVD and all-cause mortality. According to different substitution amounts (varying from one serving per week to one serving per day) and different numbers of protein foods being simultaneously substituted (varying from one to four), estimates ranged between 1%: HR, 0.99 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.98-1.00], and 54%: HR, 0.46 (0.35-0.60), lower risks on the relative scale and between 0.3%: ARD, -0.29% (-0.48% to -0.05%), and 14.0%: ARD, -13.96% (-17.29% to -9.96%) lower risks on the absolute scale.
CONCLUSIONS: Nuts, whole grains, legumes and fish appeared to be healthier protein sources than eggs, processed meat, unprocessed red meat and poultry for preventing incident CVD and premature death. The magnitude of lower risk for incident CVD and all-cause mortality was driven by amount and number of animal protein foods substituted.
© The Author(s) 2021; all rights reserved. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal protein; cardiovascular disease; mortality; plant protein; protein foods; public health nutrition; substitution

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33411911      PMCID: PMC8687122          DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyaa205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  36 in total

Review 1.  Dietary pattern analysis: a new direction in nutritional epidemiology.

Authors:  Frank B Hu
Journal:  Curr Opin Lipidol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.776

2.  Data Resource Profile: The Cardiovascular Disease Lifetime Risk Pooling Project.

Authors:  John T Wilkins; Kunal N Karmali; Mark D Huffman; Norrina B Allen; Hongyan Ning; Jarett D Berry; Daniel B Garside; Alan Dyer; Donald M Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Lifetime risks of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Jarett D Berry; Alan Dyer; Xuan Cai; Daniel B Garside; Hongyan Ning; Avis Thomas; Philip Greenland; Linda Van Horn; Russell P Tracy; Donald M Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Comparison of techniques for estimating nutrient intake: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  B M Posner; S S Martin-Munley; C Smigelski; L A Cupples; J L Cobb; E Schaefer; D R Miller; R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Associations of dietary protein with disease and mortality in a prospective study of postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Linda E Kelemen; Lawrence H Kushi; David R Jacobs; James R Cerhan
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Major dietary protein sources and risk of coronary heart disease in women.

Authors:  Adam M Bernstein; Qi Sun; Frank B Hu; Meir J Stampfer; JoAnn E Manson; Walter C Willett
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Cohort Profile: The Framingham Heart Study (FHS): overview of milestones in cardiovascular epidemiology.

Authors:  Connie W Tsao; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: design and objectives. The ARIC investigators.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  A study of the reliability and comparative validity of the cardia dietary history.

Authors:  K Liu; M Slattery; D Jacobs; G Cutter; A McDonald; L Van Horn; J E Hilner; B Caan; C Bragg; A Dyer
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.847

10.  Association of Animal and Plant Protein Intake With All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality.

Authors:  Mingyang Song; Teresa T Fung; Frank B Hu; Walter C Willett; Valter D Longo; Andrew T Chan; Edward L Giovannucci
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 21.873

View more
  4 in total

1.  Egg and Dietary Cholesterol Intake and Risk of All-Cause, Cardiovascular, and Cancer Mortality: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Manije Darooghegi Mofrad; Sina Naghshi; Keyhan Lotfi; Joseph Beyene; Elina Hypponen; Aliyar Pirouzi; Omid Sadeghi
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-05-27

2.  Dietary protein source contributes to the risk of developing maternal syndrome in the Dahl salt-sensitive rat.

Authors:  John Henry Dasinger; Justine M Abais-Battad; John D Bukowy; Hayley Lund; Ammar J Alsheikh; Daniel J Fehrenbach; Jeylan Zemaj; David L Mattson
Journal:  Pregnancy Hypertens       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.494

3.  Low-Carbohydrate Diets and Mortality in Older Asian People: A 15-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ce Sun; Wei-Sen Zhang; Chao-Qiang Jiang; Ya-Li Jin; Xue-Qing Deng; Jean Woo; Kar-Keung Cheng; Tai-Hing Lam; G Neil Thomas; Lin Xu
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  A metabolomics comparison of plant-based meat and grass-fed meat indicates large nutritional differences despite comparable Nutrition Facts panels.

Authors:  Stephan van Vliet; James R Bain; Michael J Muehlbauer; Frederick D Provenza; Scott L Kronberg; Carl F Pieper; Kim M Huffman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.