Peter G van der Velden1,2, Philip Hyland3, Carlo Contino4, Hans-Martin von Gaudecker5, Ruud Muffels6, Marcel Das1,7. 1. CentERdata, Tilburg, The Netherlands. 2. Tilburg University's Network on Health and Labor (NETHLAB), Tilburg, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Kildare, Ireland. 4. Fonds Slachtofferhulp, The Hague, The Netherlands. 5. Institute for Applied Microeconomics, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany. 6. Tilburg School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, and Tranzo (Scientific Center for Care and Welfare), Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands. 7. Tilburg School of Economics and Management, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Examine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health and loneliness in the general population. More specifically, the study focused on prevalence of anxiety and depression symptoms, the extent to which individuals with existing symptoms recovered or not, the prevalence of subtypes of loneliness, and the extent to which loneliness before and during this pandemic was associated with anxiety and depression symptoms. METHODS: Data was extracted from the longitudinal LISS panel, based on a probability sample of the Dutch population, with assessments on loneliness in October 2019 (T1) and June 2020 (T4), and anxiety and depression symptoms in November 2019 (T2), March 2020 (T3) and June 2020 (T4; Ntotal = 4,084). Loneliness was examined with the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale and anxiety and depression symptoms with the Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5). RESULTS: Repeated measures multivariate logistic regression analyses (RMMLRA) showed a statistical significant lower prevalence of anxiety and depression symptoms after the outbreak (T4 = 15.3%) than before (T2 = 16.8%) and during the COVID-19 outbreak (T3 = 17.2%). According to the Reliable Change Index, the distribution of recovery categories (remission, improvement, unchanged and worsening symptoms) after the outbreak did not differ significantly from the distribution of these categories before the outbreak. RMMLRA revealed that the prevalence of emotional loneliness increased significantly after the outbreak (T1 = 18.4%, T4 = 24.8%). Among individuals who were not lonely before and after the outbreak the prevalence of symptoms decreased significantly (T2 = 7.0%, T4 = 4.4%) and, likewise, among those who were not lonely anymore after the outbreak (T2 = 21.5%, T4 = 14.5%). However, the prevalence of symptoms increased significantly among those who became lonely during the pandemic (T2 = 17.9%, T4 = 26.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that this pandemic did not negatively affect the prevalence of anxiety and depression symptoms nor the normal recovery of symptoms among the general population during the first four months, but that emotional loneliness increased.
OBJECTIVES: Examine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health and loneliness in the general population. More specifically, the study focused on prevalence of anxiety and depression symptoms, the extent to which individuals with existing symptoms recovered or not, the prevalence of subtypes of loneliness, and the extent to which loneliness before and during this pandemic was associated with anxiety and depression symptoms. METHODS: Data was extracted from the longitudinal LISS panel, based on a probability sample of the Dutch population, with assessments on loneliness in October 2019 (T1) and June 2020 (T4), and anxiety and depression symptoms in November 2019 (T2), March 2020 (T3) and June 2020 (T4; Ntotal = 4,084). Loneliness was examined with the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale and anxiety and depression symptoms with the Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5). RESULTS: Repeated measures multivariate logistic regression analyses (RMMLRA) showed a statistical significant lower prevalence of anxiety and depression symptoms after the outbreak (T4 = 15.3%) than before (T2 = 16.8%) and during the COVID-19 outbreak (T3 = 17.2%). According to the Reliable Change Index, the distribution of recovery categories (remission, improvement, unchanged and worsening symptoms) after the outbreak did not differ significantly from the distribution of these categories before the outbreak. RMMLRA revealed that the prevalence of emotional loneliness increased significantly after the outbreak (T1 = 18.4%, T4 = 24.8%). Among individuals who were not lonely before and after the outbreak the prevalence of symptoms decreased significantly (T2 = 7.0%, T4 = 4.4%) and, likewise, among those who were not lonely anymore after the outbreak (T2 = 21.5%, T4 = 14.5%). However, the prevalence of symptoms increased significantly among those who became lonely during the pandemic (T2 = 17.9%, T4 = 26.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that this pandemic did not negatively affect the prevalence of anxiety and depression symptoms nor the normal recovery of symptoms among the general population during the first four months, but that emotional loneliness increased.
Authors: P Hyland; M Shevlin; O McBride; J Murphy; T Karatzias; R P Bentall; A Martinez; F Vallières Journal: Acta Psychiatr Scand Date: 2020-08-09 Impact factor: 6.392
Authors: Martina Luchetti; Ji Hyun Lee; Damaris Aschwanden; Amanda Sesker; Jason E Strickhouser; Antonio Terracciano; Angelina R Sutin Journal: Am Psychol Date: 2020-06-22
Authors: Siv Karlsson Stafseth; Laila Skogstad; Johan Ræder; Ingvild Strand Hovland; Haakon Hovde; Øivind Ekeberg; Irene Lie Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-08 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Michelle T Pedersen; Thea O Andersen; Amy Clotworthy; Andreas K Jensen; Katrine Strandberg-Larsen; Naja H Rod; Tibor V Varga Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Kaili Rimfeld; Margherita Malanchini; Ryan Arathimos; Agnieszka Gidziela; Oliver Pain; Andrew McMillan; Rachel Ogden; Louise Webster; Amy E Packer; Nicholas G Shakeshaft; Kerry L Schofield; Jean-Baptiste Pingault; Andrea G Allegrini; Argyris Stringaris; Sophie von Stumm; Cathryn M Lewis; Robert Plomin Journal: medRxiv Date: 2021-10-07