Literature DB >> 33411574

Impact of Patients' Companions on Clinical Encounters Between Black Patients and Their Non-Black Oncologists.

Amy K Otto1,2, Maija Reblin1, Felicity W K Harper3,4, Lauren M Hamel3,4, Tanina F Moore3,4, Lee Ellington5, Susan Eggly3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The presence of caregivers or companions during clinical encounters influences the dynamics and outcomes of the encounters. Most prior studies of companions in clinical encounters focus on non-Hispanic White patients. However, there is generally lower-quality patient-physician communication during encounters with Black patients; these communication differences may contribute to racial health disparities. The purpose of the present study was to examine effects of the presence and active participation of companions on encounters between Black patients with cancer and non-Black oncologists.
METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of data collected during a larger intervention study. Participants were Black patients with breast, colon, or lung cancer who had a treatment-discussion encounter with a participating non-Black medical oncologist. Video recordings of encounters were coded for patient, companion, and oncologist communication. After the encounter, patients reported perceptions of the recommended treatment; patients and oncologists reported perceptions of each other.
RESULTS: Data from 114 patients and 19 oncologists were included in analyses. Only 47% of patients brought a companion to the encounter. Oncologists spent more time with accompanied Black patients, used more patient-centered communication with them, and perceived them as having more social support compared with unaccompanied Black patients. Oncologists reported that accompanied patients asked more questions. When companions participated more actively in the encounter, oncologists used more patient-centered communication. DISCUSSION: Bringing a companion to oncology appointments may be beneficial to Black patients because oncologists spend more time with patients, use more patient-centered communication, and perceive patients more positively, all of which may ultimately improve patient health and well-being outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33411574      PMCID: PMC8258138          DOI: 10.1200/OP.20.00820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract        ISSN: 2688-1527


  35 in total

1.  Do patients choose physicians of their own race?

Authors:  S Saha; S H Taggart; M Komaromy; A B Bindman
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Race, gender, and partnership in the patient-physician relationship.

Authors:  L Cooper-Patrick; J J Gallo; J J Gonzales; H T Vu; N R Powe; C Nelson; D E Ford
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-08-11       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Autonomy-related behaviors of patient companions and their effect on decision-making activity in geriatric primary care visits.

Authors:  Marla L Clayman; Debra Roter; Lawrence S Wissow; Karen Bandeen-Roche
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Patient contribution to the medical dialogue and perceived patient-centeredness. An observational study in Japanese geriatric consultations.

Authors:  Hirono Ishikawa; Hideki Hashimoto; Debra L Roter; Yoshihiko Yamazaki; Tomoko Takayama; Eiji Yano
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Racial differences in doctors' information-giving and patients' participation.

Authors:  Howard S Gordon; Richard L Street; Barbara F Sharf; Julianne Souchek
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Family and friend participation in primary care visits of patients with diabetes or heart failure: patient and physician determinants and experiences.

Authors:  Ann-Marie Rosland; John D Piette; HwaJung Choi; Michele Heisler
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  The association of visit length and measures of patient-centered communication in HIV care: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Michael Barton Laws; Lauren Epstein; Yoojin Lee; William Rogers; Mary Catherine Beach; Ira B Wilson
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-05-17

8.  The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes.

Authors:  M Stewart; J B Brown; A Donner; I R McWhinney; J Oates; W W Weston; J Jordan
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 0.493

9.  Hidden in plain sight: medical visit companions as a resource for vulnerable older adults.

Authors:  Jennifer L Wolff; Debra L Roter
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-14

10.  The third person in the room: frequency, role, and influence of companions during primary care medical encounters.

Authors:  Lisa M Schilling; Lisa Scatena; John F Steiner; Gail A Albertson; C T Lin; Lisa Cyran; Lindsay Ware; Robert J Anderson
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 0.493

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Survivorship Care of Older Adults With Cancer: Priority Areas for Clinical Practice, Training, Research, and Policy.

Authors:  Erin E Kent; Eliza M Park; William A Wood; Ashley Leak Bryant; Michelle A Mollica
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 50.717

2.  Patients' Experiences with Cancer Care: Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Katherine Treiman; Elissa C Kranzler; Rebecca Moultrie; Laura Arena; Nicole Mack; Erica Fortune; Reese Garcia; Richard L Street
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2022-04-21

Review 3.  A Review of Research on Disparities in the Care of Black and White Patients With Cancer in Detroit.

Authors:  Michael S Simon; Sreejata Raychaudhuri; Lauren M Hamel; Louis A Penner; Kendra L Schwartz; Felicity W K Harper; Hayley S Thompson; Jason C Booza; Michele Cote; Ann G Schwartz; Susan Eggly
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 6.244

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.