BACKGROUND: Relatively few studies have directly addressed the interaction dynamics and consequences of a companion's presence in the medical visit, and their findings have been contradictory. OBJECTIVES: To examine how patient's contribution to the medical dialogue, with or without the presence of a visit companion, is related to the perception of the medical visit as patient-centered. DESIGN: Observational study using pre- and postvisit questionnaires and audiotape recording of medical visits. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and fifty-five patients aged 65 or over; 63 in medical visits that included the presence of a companion and 82 in visits that did not include a companion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patient ratings of visit patient-centeredness. RESULTS: Long visits (greater than 10 minutes long) and visits in which patients were verbally active were rated as more patient-centered by patients than other visits. Since patients were generally less verbally active in visits that included a companion, accompanied visits, especially if they were less than 10 minutes long, received lower patient-centered ratings than others. The presence of a companion was not related to length of the visit, suggesting that the verbal activity of the companion was off-set by decreased verbal activity of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Our results have suggested that patients are more likely to perceive their physician and visit as patient-centered when they have an opportunity to engage directly in the medical dialogue. A minimal amount of "talk-time" for patients themselves should be safeguarded even in a short visit, when a companion is present.
BACKGROUND: Relatively few studies have directly addressed the interaction dynamics and consequences of a companion's presence in the medical visit, and their findings have been contradictory. OBJECTIVES: To examine how patient's contribution to the medical dialogue, with or without the presence of a visit companion, is related to the perception of the medical visit as patient-centered. DESIGN: Observational study using pre- and postvisit questionnaires and audiotape recording of medical visits. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and fifty-five patients aged 65 or over; 63 in medical visits that included the presence of a companion and 82 in visits that did not include a companion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patient ratings of visit patient-centeredness. RESULTS: Long visits (greater than 10 minutes long) and visits in which patients were verbally active were rated as more patient-centered by patients than other visits. Since patients were generally less verbally active in visits that included a companion, accompanied visits, especially if they were less than 10 minutes long, received lower patient-centered ratings than others. The presence of a companion was not related to length of the visit, suggesting that the verbal activity of the companion was off-set by decreased verbal activity of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Our results have suggested that patients are more likely to perceive their physician and visit as patient-centered when they have an opportunity to engage directly in the medical dialogue. A minimal amount of "talk-time" for patients themselves should be safeguarded even in a short visit, when a companion is present.
Authors: Lawrence S Wissow; Debra Roter; Susan M Larson; Mei-Cheng Wang; Wei-Ting Hwang; Rachel Johnson; Xianghua Luo Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2002-07
Authors: Lisa M Schilling; Lisa Scatena; John F Steiner; Gail A Albertson; C T Lin; Lisa Cyran; Lindsay Ware; Robert J Anderson Journal: J Fam Pract Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 0.493
Authors: Crystal W Cené; Beth Haymore; Jeffrey P Laux; Feng-Chang Lin; Dana Carthron; Debra Roter; Lisa A Cooper; Patricia P Chang; Brian C Jensen; Paula F Miller; Giselle Corbie-Smith Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2016-09-03
Authors: Jennifer H Lingler; Lynn M Martire; Amanda E Hunsaker; Michele G Greene; Mary Amanda Dew; Richard Schulz Journal: J Am Acad Nurse Pract Date: 2009-07
Authors: Neda Ratanawongsa; Debra Roter; Mary Catherine Beach; Shivonne L Laird; Susan M Larson; Kathryn A Carson; Lisa A Cooper Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-07-10 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Amy K Otto; Maija Reblin; Felicity W K Harper; Lauren M Hamel; Tanina F Moore; Lee Ellington; Susan Eggly Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2021-01-07