Literature DB >> 33411314

High-Expenditure Disease in the EU-28: Does Drug Spend Correspond to Clinical and Economic Burden in Oncology, Autoimmune Disease and Diabetes?

Wolfgang Greiner1, Keyur Patel2, Christina-Jane Crossman-Barnes2, Troels Vingtoft Rye-Andersen3, Christian Hvid3, Tom Vandebrouck4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Drug costs are increasing in Europe, and there is a heightened need to reduce pressure on healthcare systems. In 2017, oncology, autoimmune disease, and diabetes featured as the three highest therapy areas for drug spend in the EU-28. However, the absolute 1-year drug spend growth for diabetes did not feature within the ten fastest growing therapy areas.
OBJECTIVE: This study explores the association between drug spend and disease burden in oncology, autoimmune disease, and diabetes in the EU-28.
METHODS: Oncology, autoimmune disease and diabetes therapeutic areas were investigated using four methodologies. Historical and forecasted drug spend was analysed using the IQVIA MIDAS® drug sales database. Clinical and economic burden was estimated from targeted literature reviews. Trend analyses compared changes in drug spend with clinical burden using the Global Burden of Disease tool as the epidemiological reference. Cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) from UK health technology assessments were compared to interpret the health economic value.
RESULTS: Oncology had the highest historical drug spend and growth compared with autoimmune disease and diabetes. Total drug spend and growth in oncology is forecasted to exceed diabetes by twofold. Increasing oncology drug spend historically did not correspond with reductions in mortality and morbidity. Diabetes had the lowest drug spend and greatest QALY/€1000 spent benefit.
CONCLUSION: This study indicates that drug spend may not correlate to clinical burden across diseases. Future research could stimulate debate on whether more equitable drug funding may improve disease management.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33411314     DOI: 10.1007/s41669-020-00253-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open        ISSN: 2509-4262


  31 in total

Review 1.  Health outcomes in economic evaluation: the QALY and utilities.

Authors:  Sarah J Whitehead; Shehzad Ali
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  Measuring the societal burden of cancer: the cost of lost productivity due to premature cancer-related mortality in Europe.

Authors:  Paul Hanly; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Linda Sharp
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  The Rising Price of Cancer Drugs-A New Old Problem?

Authors:  Vinay Prasad; Ruibin Wang; Salma H Afifi; Sham Mailankody
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 31.777

4.  European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2015: does lung cancer have the highest death rate in EU women?

Authors:  M Malvezzi; P Bertuccio; T Rosso; M Rota; F Levi; C La Vecchia; E Negri
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012.

Authors:  J Ferlay; E Steliarova-Foucher; J Lortet-Tieulent; S Rosso; J W W Coebergh; H Comber; D Forman; F Bray
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Delivering maximum clinical benefit at an affordable price: engaging stakeholders in cancer care.

Authors:  Ronan J Kelly; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Economic burden of cancer across the European Union: a population-based cost analysis.

Authors:  Ramon Luengo-Fernandez; Jose Leal; Alastair Gray; Richard Sullivan
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2017, with focus on lung cancer.

Authors:  M Malvezzi; G Carioli; P Bertuccio; P Boffetta; F Levi; C La Vecchia; E Negri
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 9.  Barriers for Access to New Medicines: Searching for the Balance Between Rising Costs and Limited Budgets.

Authors:  Brian Godman; Anna Bucsics; Patricia Vella Bonanno; Wija Oortwijn; Celia C Rothe; Alessandra Ferrario; Simone Bosselli; Andrew Hill; Antony P Martin; Steven Simoens; Amanj Kurdi; Mohamed Gad; Jolanta Gulbinovič; Angela Timoney; Tomasz Bochenek; Ahmed Salem; Iris Hoxha; Robert Sauermann; Amos Massele; Augusto Alfonso Guerra; Guenka Petrova; Zornitsa Mitkova; Gnosia Achniotou; Ott Laius; Catherine Sermet; Gisbert Selke; Vasileios Kourafalos; John Yfantopoulos; Einar Magnusson; Roberta Joppi; Margaret Oluka; Hye-Young Kwon; Arianit Jakupi; Francis Kalemeera; Joseph O Fadare; Oyvind Melien; Maciej Pomorski; Magdalene Wladysiuk; Vanda Marković-Peković; Ileana Mardare; Dmitry Meshkov; Tanja Novakovic; Jurij Fürst; Dominik Tomek; Corrine Zara; Eduardo Diogene; Johanna C Meyer; Rickard Malmström; Björn Wettermark; Zinhle Matsebula; Stephen Campbell; Alan Haycox
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-12-05

10.  Projecting Pharmaceutical Expenditure in EU5 to 2021: Adjusting for the Impact of Discounts and Rebates.

Authors:  Jaime Espin; Michael Schlander; Brian Godman; Pippa Anderson; Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz; Isabelle Borget; Adam Hutchings; Steven Flostrand; Adam Parnaby; Claudio Jommi
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.561

View more
  2 in total

1.  Does health technology assessment compromise access to pharmaceuticals?

Authors:  Melanie Büssgen; Tom Stargardt
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2022-06-16

2.  A Comparative Analysis of Mucus Immunomodulatory Properties from Seven Marine Gastropods from the Mediterranean Sea.

Authors:  Clementina Sansone; Cecilia Balestra; Luigi Pistelli; Angelo Del Mondo; David Osca; Christophe Brunet; Fabio Crocetta
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 7.666

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.