Literature DB >> 33411268

Accelerometry as an objective measure of upper-extremity activity.

Samuel Larrivée1, Emma Avery2, Jeff Leiter2,3, Jason Old2,3.   

Abstract

Most studies evaluating the effectiveness of treatments targeting shoulder pathologies use subjective outcome measures such as self-administered questionnaires. To date, there are no validated tools that objectively measure shoulder-specific functional activity. The purpose of this study was to validate wearable accelerometers as an objective proxy for shoulder activity. Ten healthy volunteers wore accelerometers placed at both wrists, the dominant upper arm and the chest while performing standardised shoulder and non-shoulder activities. Recorded tridimensional acceleration was computed into activity counts for epochs of 10 s. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were built to determine the optimal configuration to classify shoulder-type activities. For single accelerometer placement, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was optimal for the 10-s epoch (AUC = 0.779) using the wrist placement, with a sensitivity of 94.1% and specificity of 67.5%. The combined upper arm and chest placement had an AUC of 0.985 (94.8% sensitivity, 94.8% specificity). Dual-accelerometer placement (upper arm and chest) is the optimal configuration to classify shoulder activity. However, a sole wrist-based accelerometer can be used as an objective proxy for shoulder activity in long-term unsupervised monitoring with excellent sensitivity and acceptable specificity.

Keywords:  Activity count; Shoulder; Unsupervised monitoring; Wearable sensors

Year:  2021        PMID: 33411268     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-020-02293-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  22 in total

1.  Use of accelerometers as an ergonomic assessment method for arm acceleration-a large-scale field trial.

Authors:  C F Estill; L A MacDonald; T B Wenzl; M R Petersen
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Validity and reliability of an activity monitor to quantify arm movements and activity in adults following distal radius fracture.

Authors:  Andrea M Bruder; Jodie A McClelland; Nora Shields; Karen J Dodd; Raphael Hau; Alexander T M van de Water; Nicholas F Taylor
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 3.033

3.  Estimating dominant upper-limb segments during daily activity.

Authors:  Brian Coley; Brigitte M Jolles; Alain Farron; C Pichonnaz; J P Bassin; Kamiar Aminian
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Objective Assessment of Strength Training Exercises using a Wrist-Worn Accelerometer.

Authors:  Scott A Conger; Jun Guo; Scott M Fulkerson; Lauren Pedigo; Hao Chen; David R Bassett
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  The reliability of side to side measurements of upper extremity activity levels in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Miguel Acuna; Tal Amasay; Andrew R Karduna
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Wrist activity monitor counts are correlated with dynamic but not static assessments of arm elevation exposure made with a triaxial accelerometer.

Authors:  Miguel Acuna; Andrew R Karduna
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Validation of the GENEA Accelerometer.

Authors:  Dale W Esliger; Ann V Rowlands; Tina L Hurst; Michael Catt; Peter Murray; Roger G Eston
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Upper-limb activity in adults: referent values using accelerometry.

Authors:  Ryan R Bailey; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013

9.  An accelerometry-based methodology for assessment of real-world bilateral upper extremity activity.

Authors:  Ryan R Bailey; Joseph W Klaesner; Catherine E Lang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.752

10.  Number of Days Required to Estimate Habitual Activity Using Wrist-Worn GENEActiv Accelerometer: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Christina B Dillon; Anthony P Fitzgerald; Patricia M Kearney; Ivan J Perry; Kirsten L Rennie; Robert Kozarski; Catherine M Phillips
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.