Literature DB >> 33409338

Development and Testing of an Ultrasound-Compatible Cardiac Phantom for Interventional Procedure Simulation Using Direct Three-Dimensional Printing.

Shu Wang1, Yohan Noh1, Jemma Brown1, Sébastien Roujol1, Ye Li2, Shuangyi Wang1, Richard Housden1, Mar Casajuana Ester1, Maleha Al-Hamadani1, Ronak Rajani1, Kawal Rhode1.   

Abstract

Organ phantoms are widely used for evaluating medical technologies, training clinical practitioners, as well as surgical planning. In the context of cardiovascular disease, a patient-specific cardiac phantom can play an important role for interventional cardiology procedures. However, phantoms with complicated structures are difficult to fabricate by conventional manufacturing methods. The emergence of three-dimensional (3D) printing with soft materials provides the opportunity to produce phantoms with complex geometries and realistic properties. In this work, the aim was to explore the use of a direct 3D printing technique to produce multimodal imaging cardiac phantoms and to test the physical properties of the new materials used, namely the Poro-Lay series and TangoPlus. The cardiac phantoms were first modeled using real data segmented from a patient chest computer tomography (CT) scan and then printed with the novel materials. They were then tested quantitatively in terms of stiffness and ultrasound (US) acoustic values and qualitatively with US, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging systems. From the stiffness measurements, Lay-fomm 40 had the closest Young's modulus to real myocardium with an error of 29-54%, while TangoPlus had the largest difference. From the US acoustics measurements, Lay-fomm 40 also demonstrated the closest soft tissue-mimicking properties with both the smallest attenuation and impedance differences. Furthermore, the imaging results show that the phantoms are compatible with multiple imaging modalities and thus have potential to be used for interventional procedure simulation and testing of novel interventional devices. In conclusion, direct 3D printing with Poro-Lay and TangoPlus is a promising method for manufacture of multimodal imaging phantoms with complicated structures, especially for soft patient-specific phantoms. © Shu Wang et al., 2020; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; cardiac phantom; interventional cardiology; multimodal imaging

Year:  2020        PMID: 33409338      PMCID: PMC7774877          DOI: 10.1089/3dp.2019.0097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  3D Print Addit Manuf        ISSN: 2329-7662            Impact factor:   5.449


  19 in total

Review 1.  A review of tissue substitutes for ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Martin O Culjat; David Goldenberg; Priyamvada Tewari; Rahul S Singh
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  3D Printed Cardiac Phantom for Procedural Planning of a Transcatheter Native Mitral Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Richard L Izzo; Ryan P O'Hara; Vijay Iyer; Rose Hansen; Karen M Meess; S V Setlur Nagesh; Stephen Rudin; Adnan H Siddiqui; Michael Springer; Ciprian N Ionita
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2016-04-05

3.  ULA-OP: an advanced open platform for ultrasound research.

Authors:  Piero Tortoli; Luca Bassi; Enrico Boni; Alessandro Dallai; Francesco Guidi; Stefano Ricci
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  An optical phantom with tissue-like properties in the visible for use in PDT and fluorescence spectroscopy.

Authors:  G Wagnières; S Cheng; M Zellweger; N Utke; D Braichotte; J P Ballini; H van den Bergh
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Optical and acoustic properties at 1064 nm of polyvinyl chloride-plastisol for use as a tissue phantom in biomedical optoacoustics.

Authors:  Gloria M Spirou; Alexander A Oraevsky; I Alex Vitkin; William M Whelan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  3D Printed Organ Models for Surgical Applications.

Authors:  Kaiyan Qiu; Ghazaleh Haghiashtiani; Michael C McAlpine
Journal:  Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif)       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 10.745

7.  Impact of imaging approach on radiation dose and associated cancer risk in children undergoing cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  Kevin D Hill; Chu Wang; Andrew J Einstein; Natalie Januzis; Giao Nguyen; Jennifer S Li; Gregory A Fleming; Terry K Yoshizumi
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Role of sonographic automatic volume calculation in measuring fetal cardiac ventricular volumes using 4-dimensional sonography: comparison with virtual organ computer-aided analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Rizzo; Alessandra Capponi; Maria Elena Pietrolucci; Domenico Arduini
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Anatomically realistic ultrasound phantoms using gel wax with 3D printed moulds.

Authors:  Efthymios Maneas; Wenfeng Xia; Daniil I Nikitichev; Batol Daher; Maniragav Manimaran; Rui Yen J Wong; Chia-Wei Chang; Benyamin Rahmani; Claudio Capelli; Silvia Schievano; Gaetano Burriesci; Sebastien Ourselin; Anna L David; Malcolm C Finlay; Simeon J West; Tom Vercauteren; Adrien E Desjardins
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  A Systematic Review on 3D-Printed Imaging and Dosimetry Phantoms in Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Rance Tino; Adam Yeo; Martin Leary; Milan Brandt; Tomas Kron
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.