| Literature DB >> 33409318 |
Victor A Marchenko1, Salavat S Khalikov2, Yury A Vasilenko1, Mikhail M Ilyin2, Irina A Kravchenko3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Solubility and bioavailability are crucial for maximizing the activity of an antiparasitic drug. This study aimed to develop a combined preparation for antiparasitic medicines using ivermectin (Iver), fenbendazole (FBZ), and triclabendazole (TBZ), considering their solubility, bioavailability, and activity.Entities:
Keywords: Fenbendazole; ivermectin; parasitocidal activity; solid dispersions; triclabendazole
Year: 2020 PMID: 33409318 PMCID: PMC7774792 DOI: 10.5455/javar.2020.g473
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Vet Anim Res ISSN: 2311-7710
The solubility in water of initial substances and their compositions.
| No | Samples, conditions of preparation | Solubility | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absolute, mg/l | Increase, multiplicity | ||
| Compositions based on FBZ | |||
| 1 | FBZ- initial sample | 0.33 | – |
| 2 | Physical mixture (PM) of FBZ/PVP (1/9), without M | 0.67 | 2 |
| 3 | SD of FBZ/PVP (1/9), 2 h M | 2.0 | 6 |
| 4 | SD of FBZ/PVP (1/9), 4 h M | 2.70 | 8 |
| 5 | SD of FBZ/PVP (1/9), 8 h M | 4.50 | 13 |
| 6 | SD of FBZ/PVP (1/9), 16 h M | 4.60 | 14 |
| 7 | SD of FBZ/PVP (1/9), 20 h M | 4.60 | 14 |
| Compositions based on TBZ | |||
| 8 | TBZ -initial sample | 2.0 | – |
| 9 | PM of TBZ/PVP (1/9) without M | 2.30 | 1 |
| 10 | SD of TBZ/PVP (1/9) , 2 h M | 11.60 | 4 |
| 11 | SD of TBZ/PVP (1/9), 4 h M | 18.10 | 9 |
| 12 | SD of TBZ/PVP (1/9), 8 h M | 34.50 | 17 |
| 13 | SD of TBZ/PVP (1/9), 16 h M | 57.60 | 29 |
| 14 | SD of TBZ/PVP (1/9), 20 h M | 57.10 | 29 |
M = machining.
Efficacy of parasiticides in sheep against gastrointestinal strongylates.
| No | Groupofanimals | Samples of parasiticides for tests | Dose, mg of AS /kg of | Number of sheep in group | Geometric mean number of eggs/gm feces | Efficacy (Ef), % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tests of preparation based on FBZ | |||||||
| 1 | Control | Placebo | – | 20 | 2.90 | – | – |
| 2 | Treatment | FIP | Iver – 0.2, | 10 | 0 | 100 | NA |
| 3 | Treatment | FP | FBZ – 2.0 | 10 | 1.08 | 62.8 | < 0.001 |
| 4 | Treatment | FP | FBZ – 3.0 | 10 | 0.23 | 92.1 | < 0.001 |
| 5 | Treatment | FBZ- substance | FBZ – 3.0 | 10 | 2.40 | 17.3 | > 0.05 |
| Tests of preparation based on TBZ | |||||||
| 6 | Control | Placebo | – | 20 | 2.69 | – | – |
| 7 | Treatment | TIP | Iver – 0.2, | 10 | 0.12 | 95.6 | < 0.001 |
| 8 | Treatment | TP | TBZ – 2.0 | 10 | 2.65 | 0 | NA |
| 9 | Treatment | TP | TBZ – 3.0 | 10 | 2.70 | 0 | NA |
| 10 | Treatment | TBZ-substance | TBZ – 3.0 | 10 | 2.70 | 0 | NA |
NA = not analyzed.
Statistical indicators of the number of eggs and helminths when exposed to parasiticides against Moniezia spp.
| No | Group of animals | Samples of parasiticides for tests | Dose, mg of AS /kg | Number of sheep in group | Geometric mean meaning indicators | Efficacy (Ef), % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tests of preparation based on FBZ (Ovoscopy, Geometric mean number of eggs/gm feces) | |||||||
| 1 | Control | Placebo | – | 20 | 3.10 | – | – |
| 2 | Treatment | FIP | Iver – 0.2 | 10 | 1.10 | – | <0.001 |
| 3 | Treatment | FP | FBZ – 2.0 | 10 | 2.18 | – | <0.01 |
| 4 | Treatment | FP | FBZ – 3.0 | 10 | 1.65 | – | <0.001 |
| 5 | Treatment | FBZ substance | FBZ – 3.0 | 10 | 2.90 | – | > 0.05 |
| Postmortem helminthoscopy (Geometric mean number of helminths, ind.) | |||||||
| 6 | Control | Placebo | – | 4 | 3.60 | – | – |
| 7 | Treatment | FP | FBZ – 1.0 | 4 | 1.59 | 55.9 | < 0.01 |
| 8 | Treatment | FP | FBZ – 2.0 | 4 | 0.59 | 83.5 | < 0.01 |
| 9 | Treatment | FP | FBZ – 3.0 | 4 | 0 | 100 | NA |
| 10 | Treatment | FBZ substance | FBZ – 3.0 | 4 | 1.41 | 60.7 | < 0.01 |
| Tests of preparation based on TBZ (Ovoscopy, Geometric mean number of eggs/gm feces) | |||||||
| 11 | Control | Placebo | – | 20 | 2.90 | – | – |
| 12 | Treatment | TIP | Iver – 0.2 | 10 | 2.70 | - | > 0.05 |
| 13 | Treatment | TP | TBZ – 2.0 | 10 | 2.75 | - | > 0.05 |
| 14 | Treatment | TP | TBZ – 3.0 | 10 | 2.80 | - | > 0.05 |
| 15 | Treatment | TBZ substance | TBZ – 3.0 | 10 | 2.80 | - | > 0.05 |
The effectiveness of parasiticides against D. dendriticum.
| No | Group of animals | Samples of parasiticides for tests | Dose, mg of AS/kg of | Number of sheep in group | Geometric mean number of eggs/gm feces | Efficacy (Ef), % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tests of preparation based on FBZ | |||||||
| 1 | Control | Placebo | – | 20 | 1.90 | – | – |
| 2 | Treatment | FIP | Iver – 0.2 | 10 | 1.80 | 5.3 | > 0.05 |
| 3 | Treatment | FP | FBZ – 2.0 | 10 | 1.75 | 7.9 | > 0.05 |
| 4 | Treatment | FP | FBZ – 3.0 | 10 | 1.70 | 10.6 | > 0.05 |
| 5 | Treatment | FBZ substance | FBZ – 3.0 | 10 | 1.80 | 5.3 | > 0.05 |
| Tests of preparation based on TBZ | |||||||
| 6 | Control | Placebo | – | 20 | 1.90 | – | – |
| 7 | Treatment | TIP | Iver – 0.2 | 10 | 0.04 | 99.9 | < 0.001 |
| 8 | Treatment | TP | TBZ – 2.0 | 10 | 0.76 | 60.0 | < 0.001 |
| 9 | Treatment | TP | TBZ – 3.0 | 10 | 0 | 100 | NA |
| 10 | Treatment | TBZ-substance | TBZ – 3.0 | 10 | 1.50 | 21.1 | > 0.05 |
The effectiveness of parasiticides against M. ovinus.
| No | Group of animals | Samples of parasiticides for tests | Dose, mg of AS /kg of | Number of sheep in group | Geometric mean the number of parasites on the animal, ind. | Efficacy (Ef), % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tests of preparation based on FBZ | |||||||
| 1 | Control | Placebo | – | 20 | 1.30 | – | – |
| 2 | Treatment | FIP | Iver – 0.2 | 10 | 0.80 | 38.5 | >0.05 |
| 3 | Treatment | FP | FBZ – 3.0 | 10 | 1.30 | 0 | NA |
| 4 | Treatment | FBZ substance | FBZ – 3.0 | 10 | 1.20 | 7.7 | > 0.05 |
| Tests of preparation based on TBZ | |||||||
| 5 | Control | Placebo | – | 20 | 1.30 | – | – |
| 6 | Treatment | TIP | Iver – 0.2 | 10 | 0.50 | 61.6 | > 0.05 |
| 7 | Treatment | TP | TBZ – 3.0 | 10 | 1.30 | 0 | NA |
| 8 | Treatment | TBZ substance | TBZ – 3.0 | 10 | 1.40 | 0 | NA |