| Literature DB >> 31453182 |
Ivan A Arkhipov1, Salavat S Khalikov2, Konstantin M Sadov1, Alexander V Dushkin3, Elizaveta S Meteleva3, Anastasiya I Varlamova1, Irina M Odoevskaya1, Nataliya V Danilevskaya4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our research was to evaluate the effect of mechanochemical technology on the efficacy of supramolecular complex of fenbendazole (SMCF) with polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) polymer against some helminthosis of animals.Entities:
Keywords: Efficacy; fenbendazole; mechanochemistry; polyvinylpyrrolidone polymer; supramolecular complex
Year: 2019 PMID: 31453182 PMCID: PMC6702931 DOI: 10.5455/javar.2019.f323
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Vet Anim Res ISSN: 2311-7710
Figure 1.Radiographs of XRA of fenbendazole and PVP, their physical mixture, and mechanochemically obtained composition.
Figure 2.Electron micrographs of the initial substance of PVP.
Figure 3.Electron micrographs of the initial substance of fenbendazole.
Figure 4.Electron micrographs of the composition of fenbendazole and PVP obtained by mechanochemical technology (1/10 SC 8 h).
Figure 5.Granulometric analysis of fenbendazole.
Figure 6.Granulometric analysis of the composition of fenbendazole and PVP obtained by mechanochemical technology (1/10).
Hymenolepis nana geometric counts, efficacy, and statistical significance for the treatment group (n = 10).
| Group of animals | Supramolecular complex and its composition | Dose, mg of active substance/kg of BW | Geometric mean of worms | Efficacy[ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Placebo | – | 21.032 | NA | NA |
| Treatment | SMCF | 3.0 | 0 | 100 | <0.0001 |
| Treatment | SMCF | 2.0 | 0.524 | 97.51 | <0.001 |
| Treatment | SMCF | 1.0 | 1.275 | 93.94 | <0.001 |
| Treatment | Fenbendazole substance | 5.0 | 1.464 | 93.04 | <0.001 |
| Treatment | Fenbendazole substance | 1.0 | 19.356 | 7.97 | >0.05 |
| Treatment | Physic. mixture fenbendazole/PVP 1/10 | 1.0 | 15.562 | 26.00 | <0.05 |
Percent efficacy based on geometric means.
Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05 when geometric means were compared to placebo.
Trichinella spiralis geometric counts, efficacy, and statistical significance for the treatment group (n = 10).
| Group of animals | Supramolecular complex and its composition | Dose, mg of active substance/kg of BW | Geometric mean of worms | Efficacy[ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Placebo | – | 97.863 | NA | NA |
| Treatment | SMCF | 3.0 | 0.054 | 99.94 | <0.0001 |
| Treatment | SMCF | 2.0 | 0.125 | 99.87 | <0.0001 |
| Treatment | SMCF | 1.0 | 1.416 | 98.56 | <0.001 |
| Treatment | Fenbendazole substance | 5.0 | 1.672 | 98.29 | <0.001 |
| Treatment | Fenbendazole substance | 1.0 | 89.717 | 8.33 | >0.05 |
| Treatment | Physic. mixture fenbendazole/PVP 1/10 | 1.0 | 74.362 | 24.01 | <0.05 |
Percent efficacy based on geometric means.
Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05 when geometric means were compared to placebo.
The spectrum of SMCF activity in helminthosis of sheep.
| The drug | Dose, mg of active substance/kg of b/w | Number of sheep in group | Free from infection, head | The number of larvae/eggs in a gram of feces | Decrease in the number of larvae/eggs in feces, % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | |||||
| SMCF | 3.0 | 10 | 10 | 163.4 ± 6.1 | 0 | 100 |
| SMCF | 2.0 | 10 | 8 | 168.0 ± 5.7 | 3.0 | 98.22 |
| SMCF | 1.0 | 10 | 6 | 170.5 ± 6.1 | 7.5 ± 1.7 | 95.54 |
| Fenbendazole | 1.0 | 10 | 0 | 161.8 ± 5.2 | 140.3 ± 4.3 | 16.49 |
| Fenbendazole | 5.0 | 10 | 6 | 166.5 ± 5.8 | 7.3 ± 1.8 | 95.66 |
| Control | - | 9 | 0 | 161.5 ± 5.7 | 168.0 ± 6.7 | - |
| Gastrointestinal strongylates | ||||||
| SMCF | 3.0 | 9 | 9 | 186.2 ± 6.4 | 0 | 100 |
| SMCF | 2.0 | 9 | 7 | 180.6 ± 6.3 | 3.9 ± 1.0 | 97.92 |
| SMCF | 1.0 | 9 | 5 | 188.1 ± 6.0 | 8.7 ± 1.6 | 95.35 |
| Fenbendazole | 1.0 | 9 | 0 | 179.6 ± 5.9 | 148.6 ± 5.0 | 20.54 |
| Fenbendazole | 5.0 | 9 | 6 | 184.8 ± 5.2 | 8.0 ± 1.5 | 95.73 |
| Control | - | 8 | 0 | 182.4 ± 6.4 | 187.0 ± 6.4 | - |
| SMCF | 3.0 | 8 | 8 | 114.2 ± 4.8 | 0 | 100 |
| SMCF | 2.0 | 8 | 7 | 113.6 ± 5.3 | 3.0 | 97.51 |
| SMCF | 1.0 | 8 | 5 | 112.0 ± 4.6 | 25.6 ± 1.7 | 87.03 |
| Fenbendazole | 1.0 | 8 | 0 | 116.0 ± 4.9 | 106.2 ± 4.4 | 11.65 |
| Fenbendazole | 5.0 | 8 | 6 | 115.4 ± 4.8 | 4.5 ± 0.4 | 96.26 |
| Control | - | 7 | 0 | 114.2 ± 4.7 | 120.2 ± 4.8 | - |
| SMCF | 3.0 | 8 | 8 | 109.6 ± 5.2 | 0 | 100 |
| SMCF | 2.0 | 8 | 5 | 108.4 ± 5.0 | 29.1 ± 2.4 | 74,70 |
| SMCF | 1.0 | 8 | 1 | 107.2 ± 4.7 | 76.6 ± 3.2 | 33,40 |
| Fenbendazole | 1.0 | 8 | 0 | 110.7 ± 3.9 | 95.0 ± 3.5 | 17,40 |
| Fenbendazole | 5.0 | 8 | 5 | 111.2 ± 3.3 | 5.2 ± 1.0 | 95,48 |
| Control | - | 7 | 0 | 110.8 ± 3.7 | 115.0 ± 3.5 | - |
| SMCF | 3.0 | 10 | 10 | 169.2 ± 4.2 | 0 | 100 |
| SMCF | 2.0 | 10 | 7 | 168.0 ± 4.1 | 4.6 ± 0.6 | 97.37 |
| SMCF | 1.0 | 10 | 6 | 170.1 ± 4.0 | 8.5 ± 0.6 | 95.43 |
| Fenbendazole | 1.0 | 10 | 0 | 171.2 ± 4.9 | 148.4 ± 4.7 | 15.20 |
| Fenbendazole | 5.0 | 10 | 5 | 169.6 ± 4.5 | 16.5 ± 1.6 | 90.58 |
| Control | - | 10 | 0 | 170.3 ± 4.7 | 175.0 ± 4.3 | - |
| SMCF | 3.0 | 9 | 5 | 107.2 ± 2.3 | 13.3 ± 0.7 | 88.34 |
| SMCF | 2.0 | 9 | 3 | 110.6 ± 2.2 | 46.7 ± 1.7 | 59.04 |
| SMCF | 1.0 | 9 | 1 | 109.8 ± 2.0 | 76.3 ± 2.2 | 33.07 |
| Fenbendazole | 1.0 | 9 | 0 | 108.3 ± 2.7 | 100.2 ± 2.3 | 12.11 |
| Fenbendazole | 5.0 | 9 | 3 | 109.5 ± 2.8 | 39.0 ± 1.4 | 65.79 |
| Control | - | 8 | 0 | 110.3 ± 2.4 | 114.0 ± 2.6 | - |
Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05 when geometric means were compared with placebo (control).