Debra Bernat1, Nicolas Gasquet2, Kellie O'Dare Wilson3, Lauren Porter3, Kelvin Choi4. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia. Electronic address: dbernat@gwu.edu. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia. 3. Florida Department of Health, Tallahassee, Florida. 4. National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Division of Intramural Research, Bethesda, Maryland.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to examine adolescent perceptions of harms and benefits associated with electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and their associations with use. METHODS: Data from the 2016 Florida Youth Tobacco Survey were analyzed in 2017. Participants who were in high school aged 14-17 years were included (n=22,884). Logistic regression analyses were used to compare e-cigarette use groups on perceived harms and benefits of e-cigarettes. RESULTS: Less than one half of the sample reported that e-cigarettes are harmful to their health and less than two thirds reported that individuals can get addicted to e-cigarettes. Compared with committed never users, susceptible never users and all e-cigarette use groups were less likely to report that e-cigarettes were harmful to their health, people can get addicted to e-cigarettes, and that smoke from others' e-cigarettes were harmful. Furthermore, susceptible never users and all use groups were more likely to report that it would be easy to quit using e-cigarettes than committed never users. Susceptible never users and all use groups were also more likely to perceive benefits of e-cigarette use including having more friends, looking cool or fitting in, feeling more comfortable in social situations, and stress relief compared with committed never users. CONCLUSIONS: Youth who are susceptible to use, currently use, or have used e-cigarettes are less likely to report harms and more likely to perceive benefits associated with e-cigarette use compared with committed never users. Addressing harm and benefit perceptions may be important for interventions designed to reduce e-cigarette use among adolescents.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to examine adolescent perceptions of harms and benefits associated with electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and their associations with use. METHODS: Data from the 2016 Florida Youth Tobacco Survey were analyzed in 2017. Participants who were in high school aged 14-17 years were included (n=22,884). Logistic regression analyses were used to compare e-cigarette use groups on perceived harms and benefits of e-cigarettes. RESULTS: Less than one half of the sample reported that e-cigarettes are harmful to their health and less than two thirds reported that individuals can get addicted to e-cigarettes. Compared with committed never users, susceptible never users and all e-cigarette use groups were less likely to report that e-cigarettes were harmful to their health, people can get addicted to e-cigarettes, and that smoke from others' e-cigarettes were harmful. Furthermore, susceptible never users and all use groups were more likely to report that it would be easy to quit using e-cigarettes than committed never users. Susceptible never users and all use groups were also more likely to perceive benefits of e-cigarette use including having more friends, looking cool or fitting in, feeling more comfortable in social situations, and stress relief compared with committed never users. CONCLUSIONS: Youth who are susceptible to use, currently use, or have used e-cigarettes are less likely to report harms and more likely to perceive benefits associated with e-cigarette use compared with committed never users. Addressing harm and benefit perceptions may be important for interventions designed to reduce e-cigarette use among adolescents.
Authors: Vivek Anand; Kaye L McGinty; Kevin O'Brien; Gregory Guenthner; Ellen Hahn; Catherine A Martin Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Tushar Singh; Sara Kennedy; Kristy Marynak; Alexander Persoskie; Paul Melstrom; Brian A King Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2016-12-30 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Adam M Leventhal; David R Strong; Matthew G Kirkpatrick; Jennifer B Unger; Steve Sussman; Nathaniel R Riggs; Matthew D Stone; Rubin Khoddam; Jonathan M Samet; Janet Audrain-McGovern Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Laura R Stroud; George D Papandonatos; Katelyn Borba; Tessa Kehoe; Lori A J Scott-Sheldon Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2018-10-29 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Dana A Cavallo; Grace Kong; Daniel M Ells; Deepa R Camenga; Meghan E Morean; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2019-04-01
Authors: Meghan E Morean; Danielle R Davis; Krysten W Bold; Grace Kong; Asti Jackson; Juhan Lee; Lavanya Rajesh Kumar; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2022-03-26 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Udoka Obinwa; Stephanie L Clendennen; Shazia Rangwalam; Aslesha Sumbe; Kathleen R Case; Melissa B Harrell Journal: Tex Public Health J Date: 2021