Literature DB >> 33407805

Identifying student opinion leaders to lead e-cigarette interventions: protocol for a randomized controlled pragmatic trial.

Kar-Hai Chu1, Sara Matheny2, Alexa Furek2, Jaime Sidani2, Susan Radio3, Elizabeth Miller4, Thomas Valente5, Linda Robertson3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After the US Surgeon General declared youth electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use an epidemic in 2018, the number of youth e-cigarette users continued to surge, growing from 3.8 million in 2018 to over 5 million 2019. Youth who use e-cigarettes are at a substantially higher risk of transitioning to traditional cigarettes, becoming regular cigarette smokers, and increasing their risk of developing tobacco-related cancer. A majority of youth are misinformed about e-cigarettes, often believing they are not harmful or contain no nicotine. Middle school students using e-cigarettes have been affected by its normalization leading to influence by their peers. However, social and group dynamics can be leveraged for a school-based peer-led intervention to identify and recruit student leaders to be anti-e-cigarette champions to prevent e-cigarette initiation. This study outlines a project to use social network analysis to identify student opinion-leaders in schools and train them to conduct anti-e-cigarette programming to their peers.
METHODS: In the 2019-2020 academic school year, 6th grade students from nine schools in the Pittsburgh area were recruited. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted with three arms-expert, elected peer-leader, and random peer-leader-for e-cigarette programming. Sixth grade students in each school completed a network survey that assessed the friendship networks in each class. Students also completed pre-intervention and post-intervention surveys about their intention-to-use, knowledge, and attitudes towards e-cigarettes. Within each peer-led arm, social network analysis was conducted to identify peer-nominated opinion leaders. An e-cigarette prevention program was administered by (1) an adult content-expert, (2) a peer-nominated opinion leader to assigned students, or (3) a peer-nominated opinion leader to random students. DISCUSSION: This study is the first to evaluate the feasibility of leveraging social network analysis to identify 6th grade opinion leaders to lead a school-based e-cigarette intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04083469 . Registered on September 10, 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  E-cigarette; School; Social network analysis; Tobacco

Year:  2021        PMID: 33407805      PMCID: PMC7789399          DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04990-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trials        ISSN: 1745-6215            Impact factor:   2.279


  20 in total

1.  Peers, schools, and adolescent cigarette smoking.

Authors:  C Alexander; M Piazza; D Mekos; T Valente
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.012

2.  The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research.

Authors:  Andrew C Leon; Lori L Davis; Helena C Kraemer
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 4.791

3.  Students' perception of community disapproval, perceived enforcement of school antismoking policies, personal beliefs, and their cigarette smoking behaviors: results from a structural equation modeling analysis.

Authors:  Sharon Lipperman-Kreda; Joel W Grube
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Estimating peer effects in adolescent smoking behavior: a longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  Mir M Ali; Debra S Dwyer
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 5.012

5.  Recognition, use and perceptions of JUUL among youth and young adults.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Willett; Morgane Bennett; Elizabeth C Hair; Haijuan Xiao; Marisa S Greenberg; Emily Harvey; Jennifer Cantrell; Donna Vallone
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Effects of the CATCH physical education intervention: teacher type and lesson location.

Authors:  T L McKenzie; E J Stone; H A Feldman; J N Epping; M Yang; P K Strikmiller; L A Lytle; G S Parcel
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  "It's not smoke. It's not tar. It's not 4000 chemicals. Case closed": Exploring attitudes, beliefs, and perceived social norms of e-cigarette use among adult users.

Authors:  Blair N Coleman; Sarah E Johnson; Greta K Tessman; Cindy Tworek; Jennifer Alexander; Denise M Dickinson; Jessica Rath; Kerry M Green
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Initiation of Traditional Cigarette Smoking after Electronic Cigarette Use Among Tobacco-Naïve US Young Adults.

Authors:  Brian A Primack; Ariel Shensa; Jaime E Sidani; Beth L Hoffman; Samir Soneji; James D Sargent; Robert M Hoffman; Michael J Fine
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  School-based programs: lessons learned from CATCH, Planet Health, and Not-On-Tobacco.

Authors:  Adele Franks; Steven H Kelder; Geri A Dino; Kimberly A Horn; Steven L Gortmaker; Jean L Wiecha; Eduardo J Simoes
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Reducing Cancer and Cancer Disparities: Lessons From a Youth-Generated Diabetes Prevention Campaign.

Authors:  Dean Schillinger; Pamela M Ling; Sarah Fine; Cherrie B Boyer; Elizabeth Rogers; Roberto Ariel Vargas; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  1 in total

1.  Interventions to mitigate vaping misinformation: protocol for a scoping review.

Authors:  Navin Kumar; Sam Hampsher; Nathan Walter; Kate Nyhan; Munmun De Choudhury
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2022-10-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.