Literature DB >> 11457629

Effects of the CATCH physical education intervention: teacher type and lesson location.

T L McKenzie1, E J Stone, H A Feldman, J N Epping, M Yang, P K Strikmiller, L A Lytle, G S Parcel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Substantial differences exist in how and where physical education (PE) is conducted in elementary schools throughout the United States. Few effectiveness studies of large-scale interventions to improve PE have been reported.
DESIGN: Multicenter randomized trial. SETTING/ PARTICIPANTS: The Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH) was implemented in PE classes in 96 schools (56 intervention, 40 control) in four study centers: California, Louisiana, Minnesota, and Texas. INTERVENTION: The 2.5-year PE intervention consisted of professional development sessions, curricula, and follow-up consultations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intervention effects on student physical activity and lesson context in PE were examined by teacher type (PE specialists and classroom teachers) and lesson location (indoors and outdoors).
RESULTS: Differential effects by teacher type and lesson location were evidenced for both physical activity and lesson context. Observations of 2016 lessons showed that intervention schools provided more moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (p=0.002) and vigorous physical activity (p=0.02) than controls. Classroom teachers improved physical activity relatively more than PE specialists, but PE specialists still provided longer lessons and more physical activity. Classroom teachers increased lesson length (p=0.02) and time for physical fitness (p=0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: The intervention improved PE of both specialists' and classroom teachers' lessons. States and districts should ensure that the most qualified staff teaches PE. Interventions need to be tailored to meet local needs and conditions, including teacher type and location of lessons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11457629     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00335-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  32 in total

1.  Environmental characteristics and student physical activity in PE class: findings from two large urban areas of Texas.

Authors:  Katherine A Skala; Andrew E Springer; Shreela V Sharma; Deanna M Hoelscher; Steven H Kelder
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2011-05-12

2.  A description of the social-ecological framework used in the trial of activity for adolescent girls (TAAG).

Authors:  John P Elder; Leslie Lytle; James F Sallis; Deborah Rohm Young; Allan Steckler; Denise Simons-Morton; Elaine Stone; Jared B Jobe; June Stevens; Tim Lohman; Larry Webber; Russell Pate; Brit I Saksvig; Kurt Ribisl
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2006-07-19

3.  Safe play spaces to promote physical activity in inner-city children: results from a pilot study of an environmental intervention.

Authors:  Thomas A Farley; Rebecca A Meriwether; Erin T Baker; Liza T Watkins; Carolyn C Johnson; Larry S Webber
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Physically active vs. sedentary academic lessons: A dose response study for elementary student time on task.

Authors:  Lauren A Grieco; Esbelle M Jowers; Vanessa L Errisuriz; John B Bartholomew
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Neighborhood poverty, park use, and park-based physical activity in a Southern California city.

Authors:  Deborah A Cohen; Bing Han; Kathryn Pitkin Derose; Stephanie Williamson; Terry Marsh; Jodi Rudick; Thomas L McKenzie
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Mediators affecting girls' levels of physical activity outside of school: findings from the trial of activity in adolescent girls.

Authors:  Leslie A Lytle; David M Murray; Kelly R Evenson; Jamie Moody; Charlotte A Pratt; Lauve Metcalfe; Deborah Parra-Medina
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2009-12-12

Review 7.  School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.

Authors:  Maureen Dobbins; Heather Husson; Kara DeCorby; Rebecca L LaRocca
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28

8.  Individual and Instructional Determinants of Student Engagement in Physical Education.

Authors:  Katherine Bevans; Leslie-Anne Fitzpatrick; Betty Sanchez; Christopher B Forrest
Journal:  J Teach Phys Educ       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 4.155

Review 9.  Lessons learned from the HEALTHY primary prevention trial of risk factors for type 2 diabetes in middle school youth.

Authors:  Marsha D Marcus; Kathryn Hirst; Francine Kaufman; Gary D Foster; Tom Baranowski
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.810

10.  Rationale, design and methods of the HEALTHY study physical education intervention component.

Authors:  R G McMurray; S Bassin; R Jago; S Bruecker; E L Moe; T Murray; S L Mazzuto; S L Volpe
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.095

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.