Literature DB >> 3340758

Aortic dissection: sensitivity and specificity of MR imaging.

B A Kersting-Sommerhoff1, C B Higgins, R D White, C P Sommerhoff, M J Lipton.   

Abstract

Gated transverse magnetic resonance (MR) images of 54 patients (35 male, 19 female; aged 16-90 years) with suspected or known aortic dissection were reviewed by three cardiac radiologists without knowledge of clinical details. The reviewers independently determined the presence or absence and the type of aortic dissection. A confidence level was assigned for each diagnosis, and receiver operating characteristic curves were generated. The reviewer with extensive MR experience correctly identified 96% of the proved aortic dissections and all of the normal cases; the reviewer with moderate experience identified 96% and 84%, respectively; and the reviewer with minimal experience, 78% and 94%. The sensitivity at a specificity level of 90% was determined for each reviewer (100%, 96%, and 83%, respectively). MR imaging is highly sensitive and specific in the diagnosis of aortic dissection but does require considerable experience because of the need to recognize flow artifacts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3340758     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.166.3.3340758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  10 in total

1.  Phase-contrast cine MR angiography detection of thoracic aortic dissection.

Authors:  J M Silverman; S Raissi; J M Tyszka; A Trento; R J Herfkens
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  2000-12

2.  Optimal diagnostic imaging of aortic dissection.

Authors:  C R Wilbers; C L Carrol; M A Hnilica
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1990

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of thoracic aortic dissections.

Authors:  S L Sax
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1990

4.  Fate of the native aorta after repair of acute type A dissection: a magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  N R Moore; A J Parry; B Trottman-Dickenson; R Pillai; S Westaby
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of dissection in pseudocoarctation of the aorta.

Authors:  J Safir; A Kerr; H Morehouse; A Frost; H Berman
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Comparison of conventional and transesophageal echocardiography with magnetic resonance imaging for anatomical mapping of thoracic aortic dissection. A dual noninvasive imaging study with anatomical and/or angiographic validation.

Authors:  C A Nienaber; Y von Kodolitsch; C J Brockhoff; D H Koschyk; R P Spielmann
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1994-03

7.  Follow-up of aortic dissection: contribution of MR angiography for evaluation of the abdominal aorta and its branches.

Authors:  J Bogaert; B Meyns; F E Rademakers; H Bosmans; J Verschakelen; W Flameng; G Marchal; A L Baert
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Usefulness of turbo-FLASH dynamic MR imaging of dissecting aneurysms of the thoracic aorta.

Authors:  S Tomiguchi; S Morishita; R Nakashima; M Hara; Y Oyama; A Kojima; M Takahashi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance imaging of acquired cardiac disease.

Authors:  C L Carrol; C B Higgins; G R Caputo
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1996

10.  Acute dissection of the descending aorta: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Brian A Bergmark; Piotr Sobieszczyk; Edwin C Gravereaux; Marc Bonaca; Robert P Giugliano
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2013-08-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.