Literature DB >> 33407291

Testing the feasibility of a sustainable preschool obesity prevention approach: a mixed-methods service evaluation of a volunteer-led HENRY programme.

Neil Howlett1, Kim P J Roberts2, Di Swanston2, Laurel D Edmunds3, Thomas A Willis4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over the last 10 years HENRY has been working to reduce and prevent child obesity by training health and early years professionals to deliver its evidence-based programme to parents. The aim and unique contribution of this study was to evaluate whether training volunteers to deliver this programme on a one-to-one basis was feasible.
METHODS: Mixed-methods service evaluation with parent-reported pre- and post-programme outcomes and focus groups conducted with parents and volunteer facilitators. The programme consisted of 8 one-to-one sessions delivered weekly by volunteers (n = 18) to build food and activity-related knowledge, skills, and understanding, and improve parenting efficacy, and parent and child eating and physical activity. Programmes took place at parent's (n = 69) home or local community venues in four London boroughs, United Kingdom. Parent-reported parenting efficacy, emotional wellbeing, eating, and physical activity data were captured, alongside parent ratings of the programme and volunteer ratings of the training. Parent and volunteer focus groups explored involvement, expectations, and experiences of the programme, training and delivery, feedback, and impact.
RESULTS: Parents were mostly female, had varied ethnic backgrounds, and were often not working but well educated. There were statistically significant improvements of a medium-to-large size in parent and child emotional wellbeing, parenting efficacy, fruit and vegetable consumption, family eating and food purchasing behaviours. Parent ratings of the programme were positive and qualitative data highlighted the holistic nature of the programme, which focused on more than just food, and the relationships with volunteers as key facets. Volunteers were also mostly female, had varied ethnic backgrounds, and were often well educated, but more likely to be employed than parents. Volunteers rated the training and delivery as useful in enabling them to deliver the programme confidently and for their own wellbeing. Despite finding some sessions challenging emotionally, volunteers reported positive family lifestyle improvements by parents and children and that the experience would be useful for future employment.
CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to recruit and train volunteers to deliver a structured preschool obesity prevention programme, which parents considered acceptable and enjoyable, with preliminary reports of parent and child benefits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behaviour change; HENRY; Healthy eating; Mixed-methods; Parent-focused; Preschool obesity prevention; Volunteers

Year:  2021        PMID: 33407291      PMCID: PMC7789777          DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-10031-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Public Health        ISSN: 1471-2458            Impact factor:   3.295


  27 in total

1.  Evaluating health visitor parenting support: validating outcome measures for parental self-efficacy.

Authors:  Karen A Whittaker; Sarah Cowley
Journal:  J Child Health Care       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.979

2.  Preventing child obesity: a long-term evaluation of the HENRY approach.

Authors:  Rebecca E Brown; Thomas A Willis; Nichola Aspinall; Hunt Candida; Jackie George; Mary C J Rudolf
Journal:  Community Pract       Date:  2013-07

3.  Prevention of overweight and obesity in children and youth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Leslea Peirson; Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis; Katherine Morrison; Donna Ciliska; Meghan Kenny; Muhammad Usman Ali; Parminder Raina
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-01-13

4.  The impact of HENRY on parenting and family lifestyle: Exploratory analysis of the mechanisms for change.

Authors:  Gemma L Bridge; Thomas A Willis; Charlotte E L Evans; Kim P J Roberts; Mary Rudolf
Journal:  Child Care Health Dev       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.508

5.  Reliability and validity of the Family Eating and Activity Habits Questionnaire.

Authors:  M Golan; A Weizman
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 6.  Achieving child survival goals: potential contribution of community health workers.

Authors:  Andy Haines; David Sanders; Uta Lehmann; Alexander K Rowe; Joy E Lawn; Steve Jan; Damian G Walker; Zulfiqar Bhutta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Development and psychometric evaluation of the TAPQOL: a health-related quality of life instrument for 1-5-year-old children.

Authors:  M Fekkes; N C Theunissen; E Brugman; S Veen; E G Verrips; H M Koopman; T Vogels; J M Wit; S P Verloove-Vanhorick
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.440

Review 8.  Which intervention design factors influence performance of community health workers in low- and middle-income countries? A systematic review.

Authors:  Maryse C Kok; Marjolein Dieleman; Miriam Taegtmeyer; Jacqueline E W Broerse; Sumit S Kane; Hermen Ormel; Mandy M Tijm; Korrie A M de Koning
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.344

9.  Is volunteering a public health intervention? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the health and survival of volunteers.

Authors:  Caroline E Jenkinson; Andy P Dickens; Kerry Jones; Jo Thompson-Coon; Rod S Taylor; Morwenna Rogers; Clare L Bambra; Iain Lang; Suzanne H Richards
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 10.  The impact of interventions to prevent obesity or improve obesity related behaviours in children (0-5 years) from socioeconomically disadvantaged and/or indigenous families: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rachel Laws; Karen J Campbell; Paige van der Pligt; Georgina Russell; Kylie Ball; John Lynch; David Crawford; Rachael Taylor; Deborah Askew; Elizabeth Denney-Wilson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.