| Literature DB >> 33406632 |
E M Claudia Terlouw1, Brigitte Picard1, Véronique Deiss1, Cécile Berri2, Jean-François Hocquette1, Bénédicte Lebret3, Florence Lefèvre4, Ruth Hamill5, Mohammed Gagaoua5.
Abstract
Despite increasingly detailed knowledge of the biochemical processes involved in the determination of meat quality traits, robust models, using biochemical characteristics of the muscle to predict future meat quality, lack. The neglecting of various aspects of the model paradigm may explain this. First, preslaughter stress has a major impact on meat quality and varies according to slaughter context and individuals. Yet, it is rarely taken into account in meat quality models. Second, phenotypic similarity does not imply similarity in the underlying biological causes, and several models may be needed to explain a given phenotype. Finally, the implications of the complexity of biological systems are discussed: a homeostatic equilibrium can be reached in countless ways, involving thousands of interacting processes and molecules at different levels of the organism, changing over time and differing between animals. Consequently, even a robust model may explain a significant part, but not all of the variability between individuals.Entities:
Keywords: behavior; biochemistry; meat quality; modeling; physiology; postmortem muscle metabolism; proteomics; slaughter; stress
Year: 2021 PMID: 33406632 DOI: 10.3390/foods10010084
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158