Literature DB >> 33406116

Evaluating survival in subjects with astrocytic brain tumors by dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion MR imaging.

Matthew L White1, Yan Zhang1, Syed A Jaffar Kazmi2, Michele Aizenberg3, Nicole Shonka4, Fang Yu5, Adams Kusi Appiah5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Studies have evaluated the application of perfusion MR for predicting survival in patients with astrocytic brain tumors, but few of them statistically adjust their results to reflect the impact of the variability of treatment administered in the patients. Our aim was to analyze the association between the perfusion values and overall survival time, with adjustment for various clinical factors, including initial treatments and follow-up treatments.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study consisted of 51 patients with astrocytic brain tumors who underwent perfusion-weighted MRI with MultiHance® at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg prior to initial surgery. We measured the mean rCBV, the 5% & 10% maximum rCBV, and the variation of rCBV in the tumors. Comparisons were made between patients with and without 2-year survival using two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test for the continuous data, or chi-square and Fisher exact tests for categorical data. The multivariate cox-proportional hazard regression was fit to evaluate the association between rCBV and overall survival time, with adjustment for clinical factors.
RESULTS: Patients who survived less than 2 years after diagnosis had a higher mean and maximum rCBV and a larger variation of rCBV. After adjusting for clinical factors including therapeutic measures, we found no significant association of overall survival time within 2 years with any of these rCBV values.
CONCLUSIONS: Although patients who survived less than 2 years had a higher mean and maximum rCBV and a larger variation of rCBV, rCBV itself may not be used independently for predicting 2-year survival of patients with astrocytic brain tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33406116      PMCID: PMC7787526          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  40 in total

1.  Glial neoplasms: dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  E A Knopp; S Cha; G Johnson; A Mazumdar; J G Golfinos; D Zagzag; D C Miller; P J Kelly; I I Kricheff
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Current diagnostic concepts of astrocytic tumors.

Authors:  S R VandenBerg
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.685

3.  Prognostic Value of Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Patients with Glioblastomas.

Authors:  G Çoban; S Mohan; F Kural; S Wang; D M O'Rourke; H Poptani
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Expression of EGFRvIII in glioblastoma: prognostic significance revisited.

Authors:  Nicola Montano; Tonia Cenci; Maurizio Martini; Quintino Giorgio D'Alessandris; Federica Pelacchi; Lucia Ricci-Vitiani; Giulio Maira; Ruggero De Maria; Luigi Maria Larocca; Roberto Pallini
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.715

6.  Spin-echo echo-planar perfusion prior to chemoradiation is a strong independent predictor of progression-free and overall survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Authors:  Ayca Akgoz; Rifaquat Rahman; Hui You; Jinrong Qu; Alhafidz Hamdan; Ravi T Seethamraju; Patrick Y Wen; Geoffrey S Young
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Association of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI: Comparison of intraindividually matched T1 - and T2 (*) -based bolus techniques.

Authors:  David Bonekamp; Katerina Deike; Benedikt Wiestler; Wolfgang Wick; Martin Bendszus; Alexander Radbruch; Sabine Heiland
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Prognostic value of perfusion MR imaging of high-grade astrocytomas: long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  T Hirai; R Murakami; H Nakamura; M Kitajima; H Fukuoka; A Sasao; M Akter; Y Hayashida; R Toya; N Oya; K Awai; K Iyama; J-i Kuratsu; Y Yamashita
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 9.  FSL.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy with Temozolomide Followed by Adjuvant Temozolomide for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Patients: A Retrospective Multicenter Observation Study in Korea.

Authors:  Byung Sup Kim; Ho Jun Seol; Do-Hyun Nam; Chul-Kee Park; Il Han Kim; Tae Min Kim; Jeong Hoon Kim; Young Hyun Cho; Sang Min Yoon; Jong Hee Chang; Seok-Gu Kang; Eui Hyun Kim; Chang-Ok Suh; Tae-Young Jung; Kyung-Hwa Lee; Chae-Yong Kim; In Ah Kim; Chang-Ki Hong; Heon Yoo; Jin Hee Kim; Shin-Hyuk Kang; Min Kyu Kang; Eun-Young Kim; Sun-Hwan Kim; Dong-Sup Chung; Sun-Chul Hwang; Joon-Ho Song; Sung Jin Cho; Sun-Il Lee; Youn-Soo Lee; Kook-Jin Ahn; Se Hoon Kim; Do Hun Lim; Ho-Shin Gwak; Se-Hoon Lee; Yong-Kil Hong
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 4.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.