BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although the prognostic value of perfusion MR imaging in various gliomas has been investigated, that in high-grade astrocytomas alone has not been fully evaluated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate retrospectively whether the tumor maximum relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) on pretreatment perfusion MR imaging is of prognostic value in patients with high-grade astrocytoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1999 and December 2002, 49 patients (30 men, 19 women; age range, 23-76 years) with supratentorial high-grade astrocytoma underwent MR imaging before the inception of treatment. The patient age, sex, symptom duration, neurologic function, mental status, Karnofsky Performance Scale, extent of surgery, histopathologic diagnosis, tumor component enhancement, and maximum rCBV were assessed to identify factors affecting survival. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, the logrank test, and the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model were used to evaluate prognostic factors. RESULTS: The maximum rCBV was significantly higher in the 31 patients with glioblastoma multiforme than in the 18 with anaplastic astrocytoma (P < .03). The 2-year overall survival rate was 67% for 27 patients with a low (< or =2.3) and 9% for 22 patients with a high (>2.3) maximum rCBV value (P < .001). Independent important prognostic factors were the histologic diagnosis (hazard ratio = 9.707; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.163-29.788), maximum rCBV (4.739; 95% CI, 1.950-11.518), extent of surgery (2.692; 95% CI, 1.196-6.061), and sex (2.632; 95% CI, 1.153-6.010). CONCLUSION: The maximum rCBV at pretreatment perfusion MR imaging is a useful clinical prognostic biomarker for survival in patients with high-grade astrocytoma.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although the prognostic value of perfusion MR imaging in various gliomas has been investigated, that in high-grade astrocytomas alone has not been fully evaluated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate retrospectively whether the tumor maximum relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) on pretreatment perfusion MR imaging is of prognostic value in patients with high-grade astrocytoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1999 and December 2002, 49 patients (30 men, 19 women; age range, 23-76 years) with supratentorial high-grade astrocytoma underwent MR imaging before the inception of treatment. The patient age, sex, symptom duration, neurologic function, mental status, Karnofsky Performance Scale, extent of surgery, histopathologic diagnosis, tumor component enhancement, and maximum rCBV were assessed to identify factors affecting survival. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, the logrank test, and the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model were used to evaluate prognostic factors. RESULTS: The maximum rCBV was significantly higher in the 31 patients with glioblastoma multiforme than in the 18 with anaplastic astrocytoma (P < .03). The 2-year overall survival rate was 67% for 27 patients with a low (< or =2.3) and 9% for 22 patients with a high (>2.3) maximum rCBV value (P < .001). Independent important prognostic factors were the histologic diagnosis (hazard ratio = 9.707; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.163-29.788), maximum rCBV (4.739; 95% CI, 1.950-11.518), extent of surgery (2.692; 95% CI, 1.196-6.061), and sex (2.632; 95% CI, 1.153-6.010). CONCLUSION: The maximum rCBV at pretreatment perfusion MR imaging is a useful clinical prognostic biomarker for survival in patients with high-grade astrocytoma.
Authors: Richard S Polin; Nicholas F Marko; Matthew D Ammerman; Mark E Shaffrey; Wei Huang; Frederick A Anderson; Anthony J Caputy; Edward R Laws Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Joonmi Oh; Roland G Henry; Andrea Pirzkall; Ying Lu; Xiaojuan Li; Isabelle Catalaa; Susan Chang; William P Dillon; Sarah J Nelson Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: K Watanabe; K Sato; W Biernat; O Tachibana; K von Ammon; N Ogata; Y Yonekawa; P Kleihues; H Ohgaki Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Edward R Laws; Ian F Parney; Wei Huang; Fred Anderson; Angel M Morris; Anthony Asher; Kevin O Lillehei; Mark Bernstein; Henry Brem; Andrew Sloan; Mitchel S Berger; Susan Chang Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: K M Schmainda; M A Prah; S D Rand; Y Liu; B Logan; M Muzi; S D Rane; X Da; Y-F Yen; J Kalpathy-Cramer; T L Chenevert; B Hoff; B Ross; Y Cao; M P Aryal; B Erickson; P Korfiatis; T Dondlinger; L Bell; L Hu; P E Kinahan; C C Quarles Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Rajiv Mangla; Daniel Thomas Ginat; Shervin Kamalian; Michael T Milano; David N Korones; Kevin A Walter; Sven Ekholm Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: A Romano; M C Rossi Espagnet; L F Calabria; V Coppola; L Figà Talamanca; V Cipriani; G Minniti; A Pierallini; L M Fantozzi; A Bozzao Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2011-09-02 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Asim K Bag; Phillip C Cezayirli; Jake J Davenport; Santhosh Gaddikeri; Hassan M Fathallah-Shaykh; Alan Cantor; Xiaosi S Han; Louis B Nabors Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: John H Rossmeisl; Paulo A Garcia; Gregory B Daniel; John Daniel Bourland; Waldemar Debinski; Nikolaos Dervisis; Shawna Klahn Journal: Vet Radiol Ultrasound Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 1.363
Authors: Kathleen M Schmainda; Zheng Zhang; Melissa Prah; Bradley S Snyder; Mark R Gilbert; A Gregory Sorensen; Daniel P Barboriak; Jerrold L Boxerman Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2015-02-02 Impact factor: 12.300