Literature DB >> 33404346

Types of Lifetime Reproductive Coercion and Current Contraceptive Use.

Izidora Skracic1, Amy B Lewin1, Julia R Steinberg1.   

Abstract

Background: Intimate partner violence and differential power dynamics are associated with contraceptive behaviors. This study examines the role of reproductive coercion (RC) by an intimate partner in women's decisions about contraceptive use. Materials and
Methods: A self-report survey was administered to a probability sample of a diverse group of women of reproductive age in Delaware's Title X health care facilities. Currently used contraceptive methods were categorized into three effectiveness levels based on typical use failure rates: no method or low effectiveness (>10% failure), moderate effectiveness (>1% and <10% failure), and high effectiveness (<1% failure). The short-form RC scale was used to categorize RC experiences: no RC, verbal only, or behavioral. We conducted multinomial logistic regression to examine the association between types of RC and effectiveness level of current contraceptive method, taking our sampling design into account and adjusting for covariates.
Results: Among 240 women (weighted n = 6529) included in the sample, 13.9% reported experiencing only verbal RC, and 16.1% reported behavioral RC. Women who reported behavioral RC were more likely to currently be using highly versus moderately (adjusted relative risk ratio [aRRR]: 26.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.59-156.0) and low effective methods (aRRR: 3.08, 95% CI: 0.97-9.82), but less likely to be using moderately (aRRR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02-0.77) than low effective methods. Conclusions: Using highly and low effective methods may indicate two opposing ways of managing behavioral RC experiences: controlling fertility by choosing less detectable but highly effective methods or feeling disempowered and using no or low effective partner-dependent methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  contraception; contraceptive behaviors; contraceptive use; intimate partner violence; reproductive coercion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33404346      PMCID: PMC8403199          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   3.017


  27 in total

1.  Measuring pregnancy intention and its relationship with contraceptive use among women undergoing therapeutic abortion.

Authors:  Catherine Schünmann; Anna Glasier
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Psychometric properties and refinement of the Reproductive Coercion Scale.

Authors:  Heather L McCauley; Jay G Silverman; Kelley A Jones; Daniel J Tancredi; Michele R Decker; Marie C McCormick; S Bryn Austin; Heather A Anderson; Elizabeth Miller
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Recent reproductive coercion and unintended pregnancy among female family planning clients.

Authors:  Elizabeth Miller; Heather L McCauley; Daniel J Tancredi; Michele R Decker; Heather Anderson; Jay G Silverman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 4.  Systematic literature review of the costs of pregnancy in the US.

Authors:  Lynn Huynh; Mark McCoy; Amy Law; Kevin N Tran; Senta Knuth; Patrick Lefebvre; Sean Sullivan; Mei Sheng Duh
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  A family planning clinic-based intervention to address reproductive coercion: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth Miller; Daniel J Tancredi; Michele R Decker; Heather L McCauley; Kelley A Jones; Heather Anderson; Lisa James; Jay G Silverman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Intimate Partner Violence and Effectiveness Level of Contraceptive Selection Post-Abortion.

Authors:  Laura B Drew; Mona Mittal; Marie E Thoma; Cynthia C Harper; Julia R Steinberg
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Prevalence of Intimate Partner Reproductive Coercion in the United States: Racial and Ethnic Differences.

Authors:  Kathleen C Basile; Sharon G Smith; Yang Liu; Elizabeth Miller; Marcie-Jo Kresnow
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2019-12-06

8.  Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008-2011.

Authors:  Lawrence B Finer; Mia R Zolna
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Psychological distress and post-abortion contraceptive method effectiveness level chosen at an urban clinic.

Authors:  Julia R Steinberg; Jeanne M Tschann; Jillian T Henderson; Eleanor A Drey; Jody E Steinauer; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  The relationship between perinatal psychiatric disorders and contraception use among postpartum women.

Authors:  Alexandre Faisal-Cury; Paulo Rossi Menezes; Hsiang Huang
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  2 in total

1.  Coerced Choice: Resigned Contraceptive Usership Among Individuals Affected by Reproductive Coercion.

Authors:  Kathryn E Fay; Summer Corry; Rebecca G Simmons; Jami Baayd
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 2.  Caring for Mothers: A Narrative Review on Interpersonal Violence and Peripartum Mental Health.

Authors:  Marianna Mazza; Emanuele Caroppo; Giuseppe Marano; Daniela Chieffo; Lorenzo Moccia; Delfina Janiri; Lucio Rinaldi; Luigi Janiri; Gabriele Sani
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 4.614

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.