Literature DB >> 16627038

Measuring pregnancy intention and its relationship with contraceptive use among women undergoing therapeutic abortion.

Catherine Schünmann1, Anna Glasier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most pregnancies ending in therapeutic abortion are assumed to have been unintended. In the developed world, most arise from inconsistent or incorrect contraceptive use. Ambivalence about pregnancy might be associated with less effective contraceptive use.
METHODS: Three hundred sixteen women undergoing abortion in Scotland were interviewed about contraceptive use at the time of conception. A modified measure of pregnancy intendedness was used to determine ambivalence.
RESULTS: Pregnancy appeared to be clearly unintended for 92% of women. Sixteen percent were not using contraception and had higher intendedness scores (p<.001) than those using a method. Forty-four percent were using contraception inconsistently or incorrectly, almost always condoms or oral contraception, but method choice was not linked to pregnancy intendedness. DISCUSSION: Women who are ambivalent about the desire for pregnancy are less likely to use contraception. The challenge for reducing abortion rates lies in improving contraceptive use among the much larger group of women who do not intend to get pregnant but use contraception imperfectly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16627038     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  24 in total

1.  Access to Contraceptives in Countries With Restrictive Abortion Laws: The Case of Brazil.

Authors:  Ana Luiza Vilela Borges; Amy Ong Tsui; Elizabeth Fujimori; Luiza Akiko Komura Hoga
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2015-06-04

2.  Models of health behaviour predict intention to use long acting reversible contraception use.

Authors:  Gareth Roderique-Davies; Christine McKnight; Bev Jonn; Susan Faulkner; Deborah Lancastle
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-11-18

3.  Prospective assessment of pregnancy intentions using a single- versus a multi-item measure.

Authors:  Megan L Kavanaugh; Eleanor Bimla Schwarz
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2009-12

Review 4.  Family planning and the burden of unintended pregnancies.

Authors:  Amy O Tsui; Raegan McDonald-Mosley; Anne E Burke
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  The effects of ambivalent fertility desires on pregnancy risk in young women in the USA.

Authors:  Warren B Miller; Jennifer S Barber; Heather H Gatny
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  2012-12-13

6.  Measuring pregnancy planning: An assessment of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy among urban, south Indian women.

Authors:  Corinne H Rocca; Suneeta Krishnan; Geraldine Barrett; Mark Wilson
Journal:  Demogr Res       Date:  2010-08-06

7.  Patient characteristics associated with pregnancy ambivalence.

Authors:  Pooja R Patel; Tabassum H Laz; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Bringing patients' social context into the examination room: an investigation of the discussion of social influence during contraceptive counseling.

Authors:  Kira Levy; Alexandra M Minnis; Maureen Lahiff; Julie Schmittdiel; Christine Dehlendorf
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2014-12-07

9.  Effect of prospectively measured pregnancy intentions on the consistency of contraceptive use among young women in Michigan.

Authors:  C Moreau; K Hall; J Trussell; J Barber
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Inconsistent fertility motivations and contraceptive use behaviors among women in Honduras.

Authors:  Ilene S Speizer; Laili Irani; Janine Barden-O'Fallon; Jessica Levy
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 3.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.