Introduction: Hybrid closed-loop systems increase time-in-range (TIR) and reduce glycemic variability. Person-reported outcomes (PROs) are essential to assess the utility of new devices and their impact on quality of life. This article focuses on the PROs for pediatric participants (ages 6-13 years) with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and their parents during a trial using the Tandem Control-IQ system, which was shown to increase TIR and improve other glycemic metrics. Research Design and Methods: One hundred and one children 6 to 13 years old with T1D were randomly assigned to closed-loop control (CLC) or sensor-augmented pump (SAP) in a 16-week randomized clinical trial with extension to 28 weeks during which the SAP group crossed over to CLC. Health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction measures were obtained from children and their parents at baseline, 16 weeks, and 28 weeks. Results: Neither the children in the CLC group nor their parents had statistically significant changes in PRO outcomes compared with the SAP group at the end of the 16-week randomized controlled trial and the 28-week extension. Parents in the CLC group reported nonsignificant improvements in some PRO scores when compared with the SAP group at 16 weeks, which were sustained at 28 weeks. Sleep scores for parents improved from "poor sleep quality" to "adequate sleep quality" between baseline and 16 weeks, however, the change in scores was not statistically different between groups. Conclusions: Children with T1D who used the Control-IQ system did not experience increased burden compared with those using SAP based on person-reported outcomes from the children and their parents. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03844789.
Introduction: Hybrid closed-loop systems increase time-in-range (TIR) and reduce glycemic variability. Person-reported outcomes (PROs) are essential to assess the utility of new devices and their impact on quality of life. This article focuses on the PROs for pediatric participants (ages 6-13 years) with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and their parents during a trial using the Tandem Control-IQ system, which was shown to increase TIR and improve other glycemic metrics. Research Design and Methods: One hundred and one children 6 to 13 years old with T1D were randomly assigned to closed-loop control (CLC) or sensor-augmented pump (SAP) in a 16-week randomized clinical trial with extension to 28 weeks during which the SAP group crossed over to CLC. Health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction measures were obtained from children and their parents at baseline, 16 weeks, and 28 weeks. Results: Neither the children in the CLC group nor their parents had statistically significant changes in PRO outcomes compared with the SAP group at the end of the 16-week randomized controlled trial and the 28-week extension. Parents in the CLC group reported nonsignificant improvements in some PRO scores when compared with the SAP group at 16 weeks, which were sustained at 28 weeks. Sleep scores for parents improved from "poor sleep quality" to "adequate sleep quality" between baseline and 16 weeks, however, the change in scores was not statistically different between groups. Conclusions: Children with T1D who used the Control-IQ system did not experience increased burden compared with those using SAP based on person-reported outcomes from the children and their parents. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03844789.
Entities:
Keywords:
Closed-loop systems; Continuous glucose monitoring; Hypoglycemic fear; Person-reported outcomes; Quality of life; Sensor augmented insulin pump; Time in range; Type 1 diabetes
Authors: Sue A Brown; Boris P Kovatchev; Dan Raghinaru; John W Lum; Bruce A Buckingham; Yogish C Kudva; Lori M Laffel; Carol J Levy; Jordan E Pinsker; R Paul Wadwa; Eyal Dassau; Francis J Doyle; Stacey M Anderson; Mei Mei Church; Vikash Dadlani; Laya Ekhlaspour; Gregory P Forlenza; Elvira Isganaitis; David W Lam; Craig Kollman; Roy W Beck Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James W Varni; Alan M Delamater; Korey K Hood; Jennifer K Raymond; Nancy T Chang; Kimberly A Driscoll; Jenise C Wong; Joyce P Yi-Frazier; Ellen K Grishman; Melissa A Faith; Sarah D Corathers; Jessica C Kichler; Jennifer L Miller; Elena M Doskey; Robert W Heffer; Don P Wilson Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2018-07-30 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Nicole C Foster; Roy W Beck; Kellee M Miller; Mark A Clements; Michael R Rickels; Linda A DiMeglio; David M Maahs; William V Tamborlane; Richard Bergenstal; Elizabeth Smith; Beth A Olson; Satish K Garg Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2019-01-18 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: Laurel H Messer; Cari Berget; Tim Vigers; Laura Pyle; Cristy Geno; R Paul Wadwa; Kimberly A Driscoll; Gregory P Forlenza Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2020-01-03 Impact factor: 4.866
Authors: Marc D Breton; Lauren G Kanapka; Roy W Beck; Laya Ekhlaspour; Gregory P Forlenza; Eda Cengiz; Melissa Schoelwer; Katrina J Ruedy; Emily Jost; Lori Carria; Emma Emory; Liana J Hsu; Mary Oliveri; Craig C Kollman; Betsy B Dokken; Stuart A Weinzimer; Mark D DeBoer; Bruce A Buckingham; Daniel Cherñavvsky; R Paul Wadwa Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2020-08-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J Weissberg-Benchell; J B Shapiro; K Hood; L M Laffel; D Naranjo; K Miller; K Barnard Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2019-03-20 Impact factor: 4.359