Julia Wöllner1,2, David Weise3,4, Bernd Leplow1,5. 1. Department of Psychology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany. 2. Department of Neurology, Martha-Maria Hospital Halle-Dölau, Halle (Saale), Germany. 3. Department of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. 4. Department of Neurology, Asklepios Fachklinikum Stadtroda, Stadtroda, Germany. 5. Institute of Therapy and Health Research, IFT-Nord, Kiel, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Subjective symptom complaints often do not match the expert's ratings in focal dystonia. Nonetheless, perceived symptom intensities drive compliance and outcome of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) treatment. METHODS: Perception of symptom development across a BoNT cycle was obtained in 21 cervical dystonia (CD) and 15 hemifacial spasm (HFS) patients at four time points during a BoNT cycle. Subjective assessments were recorded by means of a quality-of-life questionnaire and a patient diary containing items related to subjective severity of disease, mood, pain, social impairment, and quality of life. Medical investigation used the Tsui score and TWSTRS, and a HFS rating score, respectively. RESULTS: In both patient groups, subjective intensities were strongly associated with psychological variables. Only in CD did objective assessment moderately correlate with subjective ratings solely at the beginning and the end of the BoNT cycle. Overall, the beneficial effects of BoNT treatment were only loosely associated with subjective experiences in both groups. CONCLUSION: The emotional situation should be assessed regularly in patients undergoing BoNT therapy.
BACKGROUND: Subjective symptom complaints often do not match the expert's ratings in focal dystonia. Nonetheless, perceived symptom intensities drive compliance and outcome of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) treatment. METHODS: Perception of symptom development across a BoNT cycle was obtained in 21 cervical dystonia (CD) and 15 hemifacial spasm (HFS) patients at four time points during a BoNT cycle. Subjective assessments were recorded by means of a quality-of-life questionnaire and a patient diary containing items related to subjective severity of disease, mood, pain, social impairment, and quality of life. Medical investigation used the Tsui score and TWSTRS, and a HFS rating score, respectively. RESULTS: In both patient groups, subjective intensities were strongly associated with psychological variables. Only in CD did objective assessment moderately correlate with subjective ratings solely at the beginning and the end of the BoNT cycle. Overall, the beneficial effects of BoNT treatment were only loosely associated with subjective experiences in both groups. CONCLUSION: The emotional situation should be assessed regularly in patients undergoing BoNT therapy.
Authors: J van den Dool; M A J Tijssen; J H T M Koelman; R H H Engelbert; B Visser Journal: Parkinsonism Relat Disord Date: 2016-08-15 Impact factor: 4.891
Authors: M Smit; A Kuiper; V Han; V C R Jiawan; G Douma; B van Harten; J M T H Oen; M E Pouwels; H J G Dieks; A L Bartels; M A Tijssen Journal: Parkinsonism Relat Disord Date: 2016-06-08 Impact factor: 4.891
Authors: J Müller; G Kemmler; J Wissel; A Schneider; B Voller; J Grossmann; J Diez; N Homann; G K Wenning; P Schnider; W Poewe Journal: J Neurol Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 4.849