Literature DB >> 33402486

Prognostic Factors in Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Combined Androgen Blockade: A Consecutive 15-year Study at a Single Japanese Institute.

Yoshiyuki Miyazawa1, Yoshitaka Sekine2, Seiji Arai2, Daisuke Oka2, Hiroshi Nakayama2, Takahiro Syuto2, Masashi Nomura2, Hidekazu Koike2, Hiroshi Matsui2, Yasuhiro Shibata2, Kazuhiro Suzuki2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: There are several treatment options for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) in the world. In recent years, the use of docetaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide has been used for mHSPC, but combined androgen blockade (CAB) therapy using first-generation antiandrogens has been widely used in Japan. There is a background. We performed a consecutive study of patients who received combined androgen blockade (CAB) at a single institute to determine the prognostic factors for mHSPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a consecutive study of 237 mHSPC patients treated with CAB from 2003 to 2017 at the Gunma University Hospital. Prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The associations between pre-treatment risk factors and the PSA response 3 months after starting CAB, PSA-PFS, and OS were evaluated by the Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: Among the 237 cases, the median PSA-PFS and OS times were 63.0 and 91.4 months, respectively. The median PSA-PFS and OS times of M1 cases (174 cases, 73.4% of all 237 cases) were 36.1 and 75.9 months, respectively. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score, hemoglobin (Hb), lactate dehydrogenase, extent of disease, visceral metastasis (no vs. yes), and PSA response after 3 months were significant predictors of OS according to Cox regression analysis of prognostic factors in M1 patients. The ECOG PS, Hb, visceral metastasis (no vs. yes), and PSA response after 3 months predicted OS high-risk patients in LATITUDE criteria. The OS was 92.1 months in the low-risk group (0-1 risk factors), 48.2 months in the intermediate-risk group (2 risk factors), and 16.9 months in the high-risk group (3-4 risk factors).
CONCLUSION: CAB should be considered as a treatment option for strictly selected patients with mHSPC, even though novel treatments are available. Copyright
© 2021, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prostate cancer; androgen deprivation therapy; combined androgen blockade; metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer; risk classification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33402486      PMCID: PMC7880762          DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vivo        ISSN: 0258-851X            Impact factor:   2.155


  22 in total

1.  Enzalutamide with Standard First-Line Therapy in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ian D Davis; Andrew J Martin; Martin R Stockler; Stephen Begbie; Kim N Chi; Simon Chowdhury; Xanthi Coskinas; Mark Frydenberg; Wendy E Hague; Lisa G Horvath; Anthony M Joshua; Nicola J Lawrence; Gavin Marx; John McCaffrey; Ray McDermott; Margaret McJannett; Scott A North; Francis Parnis; Wendy Parulekar; David W Pook; M Neil Reaume; Shahneen K Sandhu; Alvin Tan; T Hsiang Tan; Alastair Thomson; Emily Tu; Francisco Vera-Badillo; Scott G Williams; Sonia Yip; Alison Y Zhang; Robert R Zielinski; Christopher J Sweeney
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Apalutamide for Metastatic, Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Kim N Chi; Neeraj Agarwal; Anders Bjartell; Byung Ha Chung; Andrea J Pereira de Santana Gomes; Robert Given; Álvaro Juárez Soto; Axel S Merseburger; Mustafa Özgüroğlu; Hirotsugu Uemura; Dingwei Ye; Kris Deprince; Vahid Naini; Jinhui Li; Shinta Cheng; Margaret K Yu; Ke Zhang; Julie S Larsen; Sharon McCarthy; Simon Chowdhury
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Metastatic carcinoma of the prostate: identifying prognostic groups using recursive partitioning.

Authors:  Tracy R Glass; Catherine M Tangen; E David Crawford; Ian Thompson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Correlation of Prostate-specific Antigen Kinetics with Overall Survival and Radiological Progression-free Survival in Metastatic Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated with Abiraterone Acetate plus Prednisone or Placebos Added to Androgen Deprivation Therapy: Post Hoc Analysis of Phase 3 LATITUDE Study.

Authors:  Nobuaki Matsubara; Kim N Chi; Mustafa Özgüroğlu; Alfredo Rodriguez-Antolin; Susan Feyerabend; Luis Fein; Boris Y Alekseev; Giri Sulur; Andrew Protheroe; Susan Li; Suneel Mundle; Peter De Porre; Namphuong Tran; Karim Fizazi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Niranjan J Sathianathen; Fernando Alarid-Escudero; Karen M Kuntz; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Damien M Bolton; Declan G Murphy; Simon P Kim; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-01-30

6.  The efficacy and safety of degarelix: a 12-month, comparative, randomized, open-label, parallel-group phase III study in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz; Laurent Boccon-Gibod; Neal D Shore; Cal Andreou; Bo-Eric Persson; Per Cantor; Jens-Kristian Jensen; Tine Kold Olesen; Fritz H Schröder
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Maha Hussain; Catherine M Tangen; Donna L Berry; Celestia S Higano; E David Crawford; Glenn Liu; George Wilding; Stephen Prescott; Subramanian Kanaga Sundaram; Eric Jay Small; Nancy Ann Dawson; Bryan J Donnelly; Peter M Venner; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Paul F Schellhammer; David I Quinn; Derek Raghavan; Benjamin Ely; Carol M Moinpour; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Ian M Thompson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Chemohormonal Therapy in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Christopher J Sweeney; Yu-Hui Chen; Michael Carducci; Glenn Liu; David F Jarrard; Mario Eisenberger; Yu-Ning Wong; Noah Hahn; Manish Kohli; Matthew M Cooney; Robert Dreicer; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Joel Picus; Daniel Shevrin; Maha Hussain; Jorge A Garcia; Robert S DiPaola
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  ARCHES: A Randomized, Phase III Study of Androgen Deprivation Therapy With Enzalutamide or Placebo in Men With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Andrew J Armstrong; Russell Z Szmulewitz; Daniel P Petrylak; Jeffrey Holzbeierlein; Arnauld Villers; Arun Azad; Antonio Alcaraz; Boris Alekseev; Taro Iguchi; Neal D Shore; Brad Rosbrook; Jennifer Sugg; Benoit Baron; Lucy Chen; Arnulf Stenzl
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effectiveness of Vintage Hormone Therapy as Alternative Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Non-metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hiroaki Iwamoto; Hiroshi Kano; Takafumi Shimada; Renato Naito; Tomoyuki Makino; Suguru Kadamoto; Hiroshi Yaegashi; Kazuyoshi Shigehara; Kouji Izumi; Yoshifumi Kadonoa; Atsushi Mizokami
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Comparison of Abiraterone and Combined Androgen Blockade Therapy for High-Risk Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Naoki Matsumura; Kazutoshi Fujita; Mitsuhisa Nishimoto; Yutaka Yamamoto; Ken Kuwahara; Yasuharu Nagai; Takafumi Minami; Yuji Hatanaka; Masahiro Nozawa; Yasuhiro Morimoto; Hideo Tahara; Shigeya Uejima; Atsunobu Esa; Akihide Hirayama; Kazuhiro Yoshimura; Hirotsugu Uemura
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 6.244

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.