Literature DB >> 12478127

Metastatic carcinoma of the prostate: identifying prognostic groups using recursive partitioning.

Tracy R Glass1, Catherine M Tangen, E David Crawford, Ian Thompson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE While in patients with metastatic prostate cancer median survival is approximately 30 months when treated with hormonal therapy, there is substantial interpatient variation. To explain better the outcome in patients with advanced disease we developed a set of prognostic groups within a large-scale clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS Southwest Oncology Group Study 8894 was a randomized prospective clinical trial that compared orchiectomy and flutamide to orchiectomy and placebo. Using the technique of recursive partitioning we analyzed 5-year survival outcomes using a substantial number of patient, treatment and disease related variables to develop a set of prognostic groups with significant differences in survival. RESULTS Of 1,286 eligible patients 1,076 had sufficient data for analysis. The patient data set was split to allow prognostic group development in the first half of patients, followed by validation in the second half of patients accrued to the study. After pruning the regression tree 4 factors had a major impact on outcome, namely appendicular versus axial disease, performance status 0 versus 1 to 3, prostate specific antigen less than 65 versus 65 ng./ml. or greater and Gleason score less than 8 versus 8 or greater. Using these criteria 3 prognostic groups were developed, including a good (hazards ratio 1), intermediate (hazards ratio 1.8) and poor (hazards ratio 2.8) group. Five-year survival estimates in the 3 groups were 42%, 21% and 9%, respectively. Using the validation test set similar 5-year survival estimates for the 3 groups of 46%, 25% and 14%, respectively.CONCLUSIONS These data from a large-scale randomized clinical trial provide a validated set of easily applied prognostic groups. We hope that our results may be validated by other investigators and we would encourage the future reporting of outcomes in patients with advanced prostate cancer using these prognostic groupings. Risk stratification is helpful for designing clinical trials and individual treatment, and it should be incorporated into future reports of outcomes of patients with metastatic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12478127     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000042482.18153.30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  48 in total

1.  [Metabolic long-term complications after urinary diversion].

Authors:  R Stein; C Ziesel; S Frees; J W Thüroff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Prostate cancer survival in Trinidad: Is PSA a prognostic factor?

Authors:  Kameel Mungrue; Suresh Moonan; Maryam Mohammed; Saara Hyatali
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Time of metastatic disease presentation and volume of disease are prognostic for metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC).

Authors:  Edoardo Francini; Kathryn P Gray; Wanling Xie; Grace K Shaw; Loana Valença; Brandon Bernard; Laurence Albiges; Lauren C Harshman; Philip W Kantoff; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Cristopher J Sweeney
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2018-04-29       Impact factor: 4.104

4.  Prediction of Time to Hormonal Treatment Failure in Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer with 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar; Erik M Velez; Bhushan Desai; Lingyun Ji; Patrick M Colletti; David I Quinn
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Prognostic Factors in Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Combined Androgen Blockade: A Consecutive 15-year Study at a Single Japanese Institute.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Miyazawa; Yoshitaka Sekine; Seiji Arai; Daisuke Oka; Hiroshi Nakayama; Takahiro Syuto; Masashi Nomura; Hidekazu Koike; Hiroshi Matsui; Yasuhiro Shibata; Kazuhiro Suzuki
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 6.  The oncologic role of local treatment in primary metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Pirus Ghadjar; Alberto Briganti; Peter J L De Visschere; Jurgen J Fütterer; Gianluca Giannarini; Hendrik Isbarn; Piet Ost; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Christian I Surcel; Roderick C N van den Bergh; Inge M van Oort; Ofer Yossepowitch; Guillaume Ploussard
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Importance of metastatic volume in prognostic models to predict survival in newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sarah Buelens; Elise De Bleser; Bert Dhondt; Wesley Verla; Karel Decaestecker; Piet Ost; Valérie Fonteyne; Kathia De Man; Chloë Standaert; Sylvie Rottey; Nicolaas Lumen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Canadian Urological Association-Canadian Urologic Oncology Group guideline on metastatic castration-naive and castration-sensitive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alan I So; Kim N Chi; Brita Danielson; Neil E Fleshner; Anil Kapoor; Tamim Niazi; Frederic Pouliot; Ricardo A Rendon; Bobby Shayegan; Srikala Sridhar; Eric Vigneault; Fred Saad
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 9.  Intracellular death platform steps-in: targeting prostate tumors via endoplasmic reticulum (ER) apoptosis.

Authors:  Steven R Schwarze; Eric W Lin; Perry A Christian; Dustin T Gayheart; Natasha Kyprianou
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 10.  Chemotherapy for metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer.

Authors:  R E Miller; C J Sweeney
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 5.554

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.