Literature DB >> 33402218

Drivers of realized satellite tracking duration in marine turtles.

Kristen M Hart1, Jacquelyn C Guzy2, Brian J Smith3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Satellite tags have revolutionized our understanding of marine animal movements. However, tags may stop transmitting for many reasons and little research has rigorously examined tag failure. Using a long-term, large-scale, multi-species dataset, we evaluated factors influencing tracking duration of satellite tags to inform study design for future tracking studies.
METHODS: We leveraged data on battery status transmitted with location data, recapture events, and number of transmission days to probabilistically quantify multiple potential causes of failure (i.e., battery failure, premature detachment, and tag damage/fouling). We used a combination of logistic regressions and an ordinary linear model including several predictor variables (i.e., tag type, battery life, species, sex, size, and foraging region).
RESULTS: We examined subsets of data from 360 satellite tags encompassing 86,889 tracking days deployed on four species of marine turtles throughout the Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean, and Bahamas from 2008 to 2019. Only 4.1% of batteries died before failure due to other causes. We observed species-specific variation in how long tags remain attached: hawksbills retained 50% of their tags for 1649 days (95% CI 995-1800), loggerheads for 584 days (95% CI 400-690), and green turtles for 294 days (95% CI 198-450). Estimated tracking duration varied by foraging region (Caribbean: 385 days; Bahamas: 356; southern Gulf of Mexico [SGOM]: 276, northern Gulf of Mexico [NGOM]: 177). Additionally, we documented species-specific variation in estimated tracking duration among foraging regions. Based on sensor data, within the Gulf of Mexico, across species, we estimated that 50% of tags began to foul after 83 95% CI (70-120) days.
CONCLUSIONS: The main factor that limited tracking duration was tag damage (i.e., fouling and/or antenna breakage). Turtles that spent most of their time in the Gulf of Mexico had shorter tracking durations than those in the Bahamas and Caribbean, with shortest durations observed in the NGOM. Additionally, tracking duration varied by species, likely as a result of behaviors that damage tags. This information will help researchers, tag companies, permitting agencies, and funders better predict expected tracking durations, improving study designs for imperiled marine turtles. Our results highlight the heterogeneity in telemetry device longevity, and we provide a framework for researchers to evaluate telemetry devices with respect to their study objectives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biologging; Platform terminal transmitter; Telemetry

Year:  2021        PMID: 33402218      PMCID: PMC7786511          DOI: 10.1186/s40462-020-00237-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mov Ecol        ISSN: 2051-3933            Impact factor:   3.600


  12 in total

1.  Distinguishing technology from biology: a critical review of the use of GPS telemetry data in ecology.

Authors:  Mark Hebblewhite; Daniel T Haydon
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Resolving issues of imprecise and habitat-biased locations in ecological analyses using GPS telemetry data.

Authors:  Jacqueline L Frair; John Fieberg; Mark Hebblewhite; Francesca Cagnacci; Nicholas J DeCesare; Luca Pedrotti
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Maximum likelihood, profile likelihood, and penalized likelihood: a primer.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Haitao Chu; Sander Greenland
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  When and where does mortality occur in migratory birds? Direct evidence from long-term satellite tracking of raptors.

Authors:  Raymond H G Klaassen; Mikael Hake; Roine Strandberg; Ben J Koks; Christiane Trierweiler; Klaus-Michael Exo; Franz Bairlein; Thomas Alerstam
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Tracking apex marine predator movements in a dynamic ocean.

Authors:  B A Block; I D Jonsen; S J Jorgensen; A J Winship; S A Shaffer; S J Bograd; E L Hazen; D G Foley; G A Breed; A-L Harrison; J E Ganong; A Swithenbank; M Castleton; H Dewar; B R Mate; G L Shillinger; K M Schaefer; S R Benson; M J Weise; R W Henry; D P Costa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  ECOLOGY. Aquatic animal telemetry: A panoramic window into the underwater world.

Authors:  Nigel E Hussey; Steven T Kessel; Kim Aarestrup; Steven J Cooke; Paul D Cowley; Aaron T Fisk; Robert G Harcourt; Kim N Holland; Sara J Iverson; John F Kocik; Joanna E Mills Flemming; Fred G Whoriskey
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Translating Marine Animal Tracking Data into Conservation Policy and Management.

Authors:  Graeme C Hays; Helen Bailey; Steven J Bograd; W Don Bowen; Claudio Campagna; Ruth H Carmichael; Paolo Casale; Andre Chiaradia; Daniel P Costa; Eduardo Cuevas; P J Nico de Bruyn; Maria P Dias; Carlos M Duarte; Daniel C Dunn; Peter H Dutton; Nicole Esteban; Ari Friedlaender; Kimberly T Goetz; Brendan J Godley; Patrick N Halpin; Mark Hamann; Neil Hammerschlag; Robert Harcourt; Autumn-Lynn Harrison; Elliott L Hazen; Michelle R Heupel; Erich Hoyt; Nicolas E Humphries; Connie Y Kot; James S E Lea; Helene Marsh; Sara M Maxwell; Clive R McMahon; Giuseppe Notarbartolo di Sciara; Daniel M Palacios; Richard A Phillips; David Righton; Gail Schofield; Jeffrey A Seminoff; Colin A Simpfendorfer; David W Sims; Akinori Takahashi; Michael J Tetley; Michele Thums; Philip N Trathan; Stella Villegas-Amtmann; Randall S Wells; Scott D Whiting; Natalie E Wildermann; Ana M M Sequeira
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 8.  Marine biodiversity in the Caribbean: regional estimates and distribution patterns.

Authors:  Patricia Miloslavich; Juan Manuel Díaz; Eduardo Klein; Juan José Alvarado; Cristina Díaz; Judith Gobin; Elva Escobar-Briones; Juan José Cruz-Motta; Ernesto Weil; Jorge Cortés; Ana Carolina Bastidas; Ross Robertson; Fernando Zapata; Alberto Martín; Julio Castillo; Aniuska Kazandjian; Manuel Ortiz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Sympatry or syntopy? Investigating drivers of distribution and co-occurrence for two imperiled sea turtle species in Gulf of Mexico neritic waters.

Authors:  Kristen M Hart; Autumn R Iverson; Ikuko Fujisaki; Margaret M Lamont; David Bucklin; Donna J Shaver
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Migration, foraging, and residency patterns for Northern Gulf loggerheads: implications of local threats and international movements.

Authors:  Kristen M Hart; Margaret M Lamont; Autumn R Sartain; Ikuko Fujisaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Modeling protected species distributions and habitats to inform siting and management of pioneering ocean industries: A case study for Gulf of Mexico aquaculture.

Authors:  Nicholas A Farmer; Jessica R Powell; James A Morris; Melissa S Soldevilla; Lisa C Wickliffe; Jonathan A Jossart; Jonathan K MacKay; Alyssa L Randall; Gretchen E Bath; Penny Ruvelas; Laura Gray; Jennifer Lee; Wendy Piniak; Lance Garrison; Robert Hardy; Kristen M Hart; Chris Sasso; Lesley Stokes; Kenneth L Riley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Why do Argos satellite tags stop relaying data?

Authors:  Graeme C Hays; Jacques-Olivier Laloë; Alex Rattray; Nicole Esteban
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.912

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.