| Literature DB >> 30879872 |
Graeme C Hays1, Helen Bailey2, Steven J Bograd3, W Don Bowen4, Claudio Campagna5, Ruth H Carmichael6, Paolo Casale7, Andre Chiaradia8, Daniel P Costa9, Eduardo Cuevas10, P J Nico de Bruyn11, Maria P Dias12, Carlos M Duarte13, Daniel C Dunn14, Peter H Dutton15, Nicole Esteban16, Ari Friedlaender17, Kimberly T Goetz18, Brendan J Godley19, Patrick N Halpin14, Mark Hamann20, Neil Hammerschlag21, Robert Harcourt22, Autumn-Lynn Harrison23, Elliott L Hazen3, Michelle R Heupel24, Erich Hoyt25, Nicolas E Humphries26, Connie Y Kot14, James S E Lea27, Helene Marsh20, Sara M Maxwell28, Clive R McMahon29, Giuseppe Notarbartolo di Sciara30, Daniel M Palacios31, Richard A Phillips32, David Righton33, Gail Schofield34, Jeffrey A Seminoff35, Colin A Simpfendorfer20, David W Sims36, Akinori Takahashi37, Michael J Tetley38, Michele Thums39, Philip N Trathan38, Stella Villegas-Amtmann9, Randall S Wells40, Scott D Whiting41, Natalie E Wildermann42, Ana M M Sequeira43.
Abstract
There have been efforts around the globe to track individuals of many marine species and assess their movements and distribution, with the putative goal of supporting their conservation and management. Determining whether, and how, tracking data have been successfully applied to address real-world conservation issues is, however, difficult. Here, we compile a broad range of case studies from diverse marine taxa to show how tracking data have helped inform conservation policy and management, including reductions in fisheries bycatch and vessel strikes, and the design and administration of marine protected areas and important habitats. Using these examples, we highlight pathways through which the past and future investment in collecting animal tracking data might be better used to achieve tangible conservation benefits.Keywords: CITES; EBSA; acoustic tracking; bio-logging; fisheries stock management; geolocator; marine protected areas; satellite tracking
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30879872 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.01.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trends Ecol Evol ISSN: 0169-5347 Impact factor: 17.712