Literature DB >> 33400704

Quantile regression in genomic selection for oligogenic traits in autogamous plants: A simulation study.

Gabriela França Oliveira1, Ana Carolina Campana Nascimento1, Moysés Nascimento1, Isabela de Castro Sant'Anna2, Juan Vicente Romero3, Camila Ferreira Azevedo1, Leonardo Lopes Bhering4, Eveline Teixeira Caixeta Moura5.   

Abstract

This study assessed the efficiency of Genomic selection (GS) or genome-wide selection (GWS), based on Regularized Quantile Regression (RQR), in the selection of genotypes to breed autogamous plant populations with oligogenic traits. To this end, simulated data of an F2 population were used, with traits with different heritability levels (0.10, 0.20 and 0.40), controlled by four genes. The generations were advanced (up to F6) at two selection intensities (10% and 20%). The genomic genetic value was computed by RQR for different quantiles (0.10, 0.50 and 0.90), and by the traditional GWS methods, specifically RR-BLUP and BLASSO. A second objective was to find the statistical methodology that allows the fastest fixation of favorable alleles. In general, the results of the RQR model were better than or equal to those of traditional GWS methodologies, achieving the fixation of favorable alleles in most of the evaluated scenarios. At a heritability level of 0.40 and a selection intensity of 10%, RQR (0.50) was the only methodology that fixed the alleles quickly, i.e., in the fourth generation. Thus, it was concluded that the application of RQR in plant breeding, to simulated autogamous plant populations with oligogenic traits, could reduce time and consequently costs, due to the reduction of selfing generations to fix alleles in the evaluated scenarios.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33400704      PMCID: PMC7785117          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  15 in total

1.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps.

Authors:  T H Meuwissen; B J Hayes; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people.

Authors:  H Charles J Godfray; John R Beddington; Ian R Crute; Lawrence Haddad; David Lawrence; James F Muir; Jules Pretty; Sherman Robinson; Sandy M Thomas; Camilla Toulmin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree.

Authors:  Gustavo de los Campos; Hugo Naya; Daniel Gianola; José Crossa; Andrés Legarra; Eduardo Manfredi; Kent Weigel; José Miguel Cotes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Genomic Selection in Plant Breeding: Methods, Models, and Perspectives.

Authors:  José Crossa; Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez; Jaime Cuevas; Osval Montesinos-López; Diego Jarquín; Gustavo de Los Campos; Juan Burgueño; Juan M González-Camacho; Sergio Pérez-Elizalde; Yoseph Beyene; Susanne Dreisigacker; Ravi Singh; Xuecai Zhang; Manje Gowda; Manish Roorkiwal; Jessica Rutkoski; Rajeev K Varshney
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 18.313

5.  Performance of genomic selection in mice.

Authors:  Andrés Legarra; Christèle Robert-Granié; Eduardo Manfredi; Jean-Michel Elsen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Using quantile regression methodology to evaluate changes in the shape of growth curves in pigs selected for increased feed efficiency based on residual feed intake.

Authors:  M Nascimento; A C C Nascimento; J C M Dekkers; N V L Serão
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Genomic selection and association mapping in rice (Oryza sativa): effect of trait genetic architecture, training population composition, marker number and statistical model on accuracy of rice genomic selection in elite, tropical rice breeding lines.

Authors:  Jennifer Spindel; Hasina Begum; Deniz Akdemir; Parminder Virk; Bertrand Collard; Edilberto Redoña; Gary Atlin; Jean-Luc Jannink; Susan R McCouch
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Multi-objective optimized genomic breeding strategies for sustainable food improvement.

Authors:  Deniz Akdemir; William Beavis; Roberto Fritsche-Neto; Asheesh K Singh; Julio Isidro-Sánchez
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Early Selection Enabled by the Implementation of Genomic Selection in Coffea arabica Breeding.

Authors:  Tiago Vieira Sousa; Eveline Teixeira Caixeta; Emilly Ruas Alkimim; Antonio Carlos Baião Oliveira; Antonio Alves Pereira; Ney Sussumu Sakiyama; Laércio Zambolim; Marcos Deon Vilela Resende
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Multigenerational prediction of genetic values using genome-enabled prediction.

Authors:  Isabela de Castro Sant' Anna; Ricardo Augusto Diniz Cabral Ferreira; Moysés Nascimento; Gabi Nunes Silva; Vinicius Quintão Carneiro; Cosme Damião Cruz; Marciane Silva Oliveira; Francyse Edith Chagas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Factor analysis applied in genomic selection studies in the breeding of Coffea canephora.

Authors:  Pedro Thiago Medeiros Paixão; Ana Carolina Campana Nascimento; Moysés Nascimento; Camila Ferreira Azevedo; Gabriela França Oliveira; Felipe Lopes da Silva; Eveline Teixeira Caixeta
Journal:  Euphytica       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 2.185

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.