Literature DB >> 33400292

Predictors of treatment benefits after enhanced external counterpulsation in patients with refractory angina pectoris.

Eline Wu1,2, Jan Mårtensson3, Liyew Desta2,4, Anders Broström3,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) is a noninvasive treatment that can decrease limiting symptoms in patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP). Identifying responders to EECP is important as EECP is not widely available and relatively time intensive. HYPOTHESIS: The effect of EECP treatment on physical capacity in patients with RAP can be predicted from baseline patient characteristics and clinical factors.
METHODS: This explorative study includes all patients from a cardiology clinic who had finished one EECP treatment and a 6 min walk test pre and post EECP. Clinical data, including Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) classification and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), were assessed before treatment. If patients increased their 6 min walking distance (6MWD) by 10% post EECP, they were considered responders.
RESULTS: Of the 119 patients (men = 97, 40-91 years), 49 (41.2%) were responders. Multinomial regression analysis showed that functional status (i.e., CCS class ≥3) (OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.12-8.57), LVEF <50% (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.02-7.80), and prior performed revascularization (i.e., ≤ 1 type of intervention) (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.06-7.20) were predictors of response to EECP (p < .05, Accuracy 63.6%). Traditional risk factors (e.g., gender, smoking, and comorbidities) did not predict response.
CONCLUSIONS: EECP treatment should be considered preferentially for patients that have a greater functional impairment, evidence of systolic left ventricular dysfunction, and exposure to fewer types of revascularization, either PCI or CABG. Improvement in 6MWD post EECP could imply improvement in physical capacity, which is a likely contributor to improved well-being among patients with RAP.
© 2020 The Authors. Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33400292      PMCID: PMC7852172          DOI: 10.1002/clc.23516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 0160-9289            Impact factor:   2.882


  36 in total

Review 1.  Management of Refractory Angina Pectoris.

Authors:  Kevin Cheng; Paul Sainsbury; Michael Fisher; Ranil de Silva
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2016-12

2.  Grading chronic angina pectoris (myocardial ischemia).

Authors:  C Richard Conti
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Exercise performance, physical activity, and health-related quality of life in participants with stable angina.

Authors:  Andrew W Gardner; Polly S Montgomery; Raphael M Ritti-Dias; Udho Thadani
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Six-minute walk test as a prognostic tool in stable coronary heart disease: data from the heart and soul study.

Authors:  Alexis L Beatty; Nelson B Schiller; Mary A Whooley
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-23

5.  Experiences of Undergoing Enhanced External Counterpulsation in Patients With Refractory Angina Pectoris: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Eline Wu; Anders Broström; Jan Mårtensson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 2.083

6.  Relation between N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels and response to enhanced external counterpulsation in chronic angina pectoris.

Authors:  Anders Sahlén; Eline Wu; Andreas Rück; Inger Hagerman; Gunilla Förstedt; Christer Sylvén; Margareta Berglund; Tomas Jernberg
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.439

7.  Prognostic value of 6-minute walk corridor test in patients with mild to moderate heart failure: comparison with other methods of functional evaluation.

Authors:  Carlo Rostagno; Giuseppe Olivo; Marco Comeglio; Vieri Boddi; Michela Banchelli; Giorgio Galanti; Gian Franco Gensini
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 15.534

8.  Traditional Risk Factors Versus Biomarkers for Prediction of Secondary Events in Patients With Stable Coronary Heart Disease: From the Heart and Soul Study.

Authors:  Alexis L Beatty; Ivy A Ku; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Robert H Christenson; Christopher R DeFilippi; Peter Ganz; Joachim H Ix; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Torbjørn Omland; Marc S Sabatine; Nelson B Schiller; Michael G Shlipak; Hicham Skali; Madoka Takeuchi; Eric Vittinghoff; Mary A Whooley
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Enhanced external counterpulsation in patients with refractory angina pectoris: a pilot study with six months follow-up regarding physical capacity and health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Eline Wu; Jan Mårtensson; Anders Broström
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.908

Review 10.  Management of Measurable Variable Cardiovascular Disease' Risk Factors.

Authors:  Sonja Francula-Zaninovic; Iskra A Nola
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2018
View more
  3 in total

1.  Myocardial strain and refractory angina: an intriguing puzzle.

Authors:  Antonio Vitarelli
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Predictors of treatment benefits after enhanced external counterpulsation in patients with refractory angina pectoris.

Authors:  Eline Wu; Jan Mårtensson; Liyew Desta; Anders Broström
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Effects of Enhanced External Counterpulsation With Different Sequential Levels on Lower Extremity Hemodynamics.

Authors:  Yahui Zhang; Yujia Zhang; Yinfen Wang; Xiuli Xu; Jing Jin; Xiaodong Zhang; Wei Zhang; Wenbin Wei; Chubin Zhong; Guifu Wu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.