Literature DB >> 33400030

Safety and efficacy in inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective study comparing TREPP, TEP and Lichtenstein (SETTLE).

J L Faessen1, J H M B Stoot1, R van Vugt2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This pilot trial investigates whether the trans rectus sheath extra-peritoneal (TREPP) mesh repair is a safe and effective procedure compared to the currently most performed inguinal hernia repair techniques TEP and Lichtenstein.
METHODS: Three hundred patients older than 18 years with unilateral inguinal hernia were included in this retrospective cohort study, of which 58 (19.3%) underwent TREPP, 190 (63.3%) TEP and 52 (17.3%) Lichtenstein. The primary outcome of this study was inguinal hernia recurrence rate within 1 year after surgery. Secondary objectives were chronic post-operative inguinal pain (CPIP) lasting more than 6 months, (major) complication rates and operating time.
RESULTS: Recurrence rate within 1-year post-operative was low overall in the study population and did not differ significantly between TREPP, TEP and Lichtenstein, respectively 1.7, 2.1, 0.0% (P = 0.591). The rate of CPIP for which the patient contacted the hospital was similar in the study groups: TREPP: 1.7%; TEP: 1.6%; Lichtenstein: 1.9%; (P = 0.591). The mean operating time in minutes (SD) was significantly shorter in the TREPP group compared with the two other patient groups (TREPP: 22.2 (± 5.7); TEP: 38.7 (± 14.8); Lichtenstein: 49.3 (± 17.1), P < 0.001). No major complications occurred in any patient of the study groups.
CONCLUSION: TREPP seems to be an effective and safe technique for unilateral primary inguinal hernia repair. It is found to be comparable to TEP and Lichtenstein in terms of recurrence rates, chronic post-operative inguinal pain, and clinically significant adverse events. This pilot study proves the need for future research into the TREPP technique.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extraperitoneal; Hernia; Herniorrhaphy; Inguinal; Lichtenstein; TEP; TREPP

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33400030     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02361-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  5 in total

Review 1.  [The electronic health record: computerised provider order entry and the electronic instruction document as new functionalities].

Authors:  Joep P M Derikx; Frans L G Erdkamp; A G M Hoofwijk
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  2013

Review 2.  Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  K McCormack; N W Scott; P M Go; S Ross; A M Grant
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

3.  Chronic pain after Lichtenstein and preperitoneal (posterior) hernia repair.

Authors:  Yamac Erhan; Elvan Erhan; Hasan Aydede; Metin Mercan; Demet Tok
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  [The transrectus sheath preperitoneal procedure: a safe, effective and cheap surgical approach to inguinal hernia?].

Authors:  M W Wiesje Prins; D A Dasha Voropai; C J H M Kees van Laarhoven; Willem L Akkersdijk
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd       Date:  2013

5.  Trans rectus sheath extra-peritoneal procedure (TREPP) for inguinal hernia: the first 1,000 patients.

Authors:  J F M Lange; M M Lange; D A Voropai; M W A van Tilburg; J P E N Pierie; R J Ploeg; W L Akkersdijk
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.352

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Open Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair, TREPP Versus TIPP in a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Willem J V Bökkerink; Giel G Koning; Patrick W H E Vriens; Roland M H G Mollen; Mitchell J R Harker; Robin K Noordhof; Willem L Akkersdijk; Cees J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 13.787

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.