Literature DB >> 33398785

Making judgments of learning enhances memory by inducing item-specific processing.

Olesya Senkova1, Hajime Otani2.   

Abstract

A judgment of leaning (JOL) has been investigated to understand self-regulated learning. However, asking participants to make JOLs may increase memory by creating a reactivity effect. In two experiments, we examined whether making JOLs would enhance memory by inducing item-specific processing. We compared a JOL task with two other tasks that are known to induce item-specific processing: pleasantness rating (Experiment 1) and single imagery (Experiment 2; creating vivid mental images). Participants learned a categorized or uncategorized list of words. Memory should be enhanced when the list promotes relational processing and the task induces item-specific processing. As expected, when the list was categorized, recall was higher in the JOL and item-specific processing conditions (pleasantness rating and single imagery) than in the control condition. Furthermore, recall was similar between the JOL and item-specific processing conditions. When the list was uncategorized, there was no difference in recall among the JOL, item-specific processing, and control conditions. Making JOLs enhances memory by inducing item-specific processing. We concluded that researchers need to carefully consider how making a JOL influences memory when investigating self-regulated study behaviors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Item-specific processing; Judgments of learning; Relational processing

Year:  2021        PMID: 33398785     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-020-01133-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  16 in total

1.  Is perceptual salience needed in explanations of the isolation effect?

Authors:  J Dunlosky; R R Hunt; E Clark
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 2.  Levels of processing: past, present. and future?

Authors:  Fergus I M Craik
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2002 Sep-Nov

3.  Do procedures for verbal reporting of thinking have to be reactive? A meta-analysis and recommendations for best reporting methods.

Authors:  Mark C Fox; K Anders Ericsson; Ryan Best
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Is retrieval the key? Metamemory judgment and testing as learning strategies.

Authors:  Elçin Akdoğan; Marie Izaute; Jean-Marie Danion; Pierre Vidailhet; Elisabeth Bacon
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2015-11-25

5.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

6.  Enhanced metamemory at delays: why do judgments of learning improve over time?

Authors:  W L Kelemen; C A Weaver
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  A meta-analysis and systematic review of reactivity to judgements of learning.

Authors:  Kit S Double; Damian P Birney; Sarah A Walker
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2017-11-21

8.  Metacognitive Judgments and Control of Study.

Authors:  Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-06-01

9.  All varieties of encoding variability are not created equal: Separating variable processing from variable tasks.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; Glen E Bodner
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  The testing effect as a function of explicit testing instructions and judgments of learning.

Authors:  Fredrik U Jönsson; Margareta Hedner; Mats J Olsson
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2012-01-01
View more
  1 in total

1.  Reactivity from judgments of learning is not only due to memory forecasting: evidence from associative memory and frequency judgments.

Authors:  Nicholas P Maxwell; Mark J Huff
Journal:  Metacogn Learn       Date:  2022-04-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.