Literature DB >> 33397386

The patient advisor, an organizational resource as a lever for an enhanced oncology patient experience (PAROLE-onco): a longitudinal multiple case study protocol.

M P Pomey1,2,3,4,5, M de Guise6, M Desforges7, K Bouchard8, C Vialaron9, L Normandin9, M Iliescu-Nelea9, I Fortin7, I Ganache6, C Régis10, Z Rosberger11, D Charpentier12, L Bélanger8, M Dorval8,13,14,15, D P Ghadiri16, M Lavoie-Tremblay17,18, A Boivin9,19,20, J F Pelletier20,21, N Fernandez20, A M Danino9,12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quebec is one of the Canadian provinces with the highest rates of cancer incidence and prevalence. A study by the Rossy Cancer Network (RCN) of McGill university assessed six aspects of the patient experience among cancer patients and found that emotional support is the aspect most lacking. To improve this support, trained patient advisors (PAs) can be included as full-fledged members of the healthcare team, given that PA can rely on their knowledge with experiencing the disease and from using health and social care services to accompany cancer patients, they could help to round out the health and social care services offer in oncology. However, the feasibility of integrating PAs in clinical oncology teams has not been studied. In this multisite study, we will explore how to integrate PAs in clinical oncology teams and, under what conditions this can be successfully done. We aim to better understand effects of this PA intervention on patients, on the PAs themselves, the health and social care team, the administrators, and on the organization of services and to identify associated ethical and legal issues. METHODS/
DESIGN: We will conduct six mixed methods longitudinal case studies. Qualitative data will be used to study the integration of the PAs into clinical oncology teams and to identify the factors that are facilitators and inhibitors of the process, the associated ethical and legal issues, and the challenges that the PAs experience. Quantitative data will be used to assess effects on patients, PAs and team members, if any, of the PA intervention. The results will be used to support oncology programs in the integration of PAs into their healthcare teams and to design a future randomized pragmatic trial to evaluate the impact of PAs as full-fledged members of clinical oncology teams on cancer patients' experience of emotional support throughout their care trajectory. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first to integrate PAs as full-fledged members of the clinical oncology team and to assess possible clinical and organizational level effects. Given the unique role of PAs, this study will complement the body of research on peer support and patient navigation. An additional innovative aspect of this study will be consideration of the ethical and legal issues at stake and how to address them in the health care organizations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Co-construction; Longitudinal case study; Oncology; Patient advisor; Patient care experience; Patient partnership

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33397386      PMCID: PMC7780212          DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-06009-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1472-6963            Impact factor:   2.655


  29 in total

Review 1.  Cancer peer support programs-do they work?

Authors:  H Sharon Campbell; Marie Rose Phaneuf; Karen Deane
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2004-10

2.  Perspectives of Women Considering Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and their Peers towards a Telephone-Based Peer Support Intervention.

Authors:  D St-Pierre; K Bouchard; L Gauthier; J Chiquette; Michel Dorval
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Face-to-face vs. online peer support groups for prostate cancer: A cross-sectional comparison study.

Authors:  Johannes Huber; Tanja Muck; Philipp Maatz; Bastian Keck; Paul Enders; Imad Maatouk; Andreas Ihrig
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 4.  Patient navigation: state of the art or is it science?

Authors:  Kristen J Wells; Tracy A Battaglia; Donald J Dudley; Roland Garcia; Amanda Greene; Elizabeth Calhoun; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Electra D Paskett; Peter C Raich
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Toward structured peer support interventions in oncology: a qualitative insight into the experiences of gynaecological cancer survivors providing peer support.

Authors:  Ben Huntingdon; Penelope Schofield; Zahava Wolfowicz; Rebecca Bergin; Donna Kabel; Jennifer Edmunds; Sylvia Penberthy; Ilona Juraskova
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  The Effect of Peer Support on Colorectal Cancer Patients' Adherence to Guideline-Concordant Multidisciplinary Care.

Authors:  Arielle E Kanters; Arden M Morris; Paul H Abrahamse; Lona Mody; Pasithorn A Suwanabol
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 7.  Systematic review of peer-support programs for people with cancer.

Authors:  Louisa M Hoey; Sandra C Ieropoli; Victoria M White; Michael Jefford
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-01-10

8.  Peer support opportunities across the cancer care continuum: a systematic scoping review of recent peer-reviewed literature.

Authors:  Sarah D Kowitt; Katrina R Ellis; Veronica Carlisle; Nivedita L Bhushan; Kristin Z Black; Kaitlyn Brodar; Nicole M Cranley; Kia L Davis; Eugenia Eng; Michelle Y Martin; Jared McGuirt; Rebeccah L Sokol; Patrick Y Tang; Anissa I Vines; Jennifer S Walker; Edwin B Fisher
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  A mixed method study of a peer support intervention for newly diagnosed primary brain tumour patients.

Authors:  Douglas Ozier; Rosemary Cashman
Journal:  Can Oncol Nurs J       Date:  2016-05-01

10.  Understanding cancer networks better to implement them more effectively: a mixed methods multi-case study.

Authors:  Dominique Tremblay; Nassera Touati; Danièle Roberge; Mylaine Breton; Geneviève Roch; Jean-Louis Denis; Bernard Candas; Danièle Francoeur
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  1 in total

1.  "I Want to Help Others Like Me": A Pilot Qualitative Study on Patients' Participation in a Screening for Distress Program.

Authors:  Jacynthe Rivest; Véronique Desbeaumes Jodoin; Joé T Martineau; Nathalie Folch; Danielle Charpentier
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2022-06-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.