A M Schott1,2, A Termoz3,4, M Viprey3,4, K Tazarourte3,5, C Della Vecchia3, E Bravant3,4, N Perreton4, N Nighoghossian6, S Cakmak7, S Meyran8, B Ducreux9, C Pidoux9, T Bony10, M Douplat10, V Potinet10, A Sigal11, Y Xue3,4, L Derex3,6, J Haesebaert3,4. 1. Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - HESPER EA 7425, 8 Avenue Rockefeller, 69008, Lyon, France. anne-marie.schott-pethelaz@chu-lyon.fr. 2. Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle de Sante Publique, Lyon, France. anne-marie.schott-pethelaz@chu-lyon.fr. 3. Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - HESPER EA 7425, 8 Avenue Rockefeller, 69008, Lyon, France. 4. Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle de Sante Publique, Lyon, France. 5. Emergency Department - HEH, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France. 6. Hospices Civils de Lyon, Comprehensive Stroke Center, Hôpital Pierre Wertheimer, Bron, France. 7. Hôpital Nord Ouest, Primary Stroke Center, Villefranche-sur-Saône, France. 8. Emergency Department, Hôpital St Joseph St Luc, Lyon, France. 9. Emergency Department, Hôpital Nord Ouest, Villefranche-sur-Saône, France. 10. Emergency Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Pierre Bénite, France. 11. Emergency Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Croix Rousse, Lyon, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Optimizing access to recanalization therapies in acute ischemic stroke patients is crucial. Our aim was to measure the short and long term effectiveness, at the acute phase and 1 year after stroke, of four sets of actions implemented in the Rhône County. METHODS: The four multilevel actions were 1) increase in stroke units bed capacity and development of endovascular therapy; 2) improvement in knowledge and skills of healthcare providers involved in acute stroke management using a bottom-up approach; 3) development and implementation of new organizations (transportation routes, pre-notification, coordination by the emergency call center physician dispatcher); and 4) launch of regional public awareness campaigns in addition to national campaigns. A before-and-after study was conducted with two identical population-based cohort studies in 2006-7 and 2015-16 in all adult ischemic stroke patients admitted to any emergency department or stroke unit of the Rhône County. The primary outcome criterion was in-hospital management times, and the main secondary outcome criteria were access to reperfusion therapy (either intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular treatment) and pre-hospital management times in the short term, and 12-month prognosis measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) in the long term. RESULTS: Between 2015-16 and 2006-7 periods ischemic stroke patients increased from 696 to 717, access to reperfusion therapy increased from 9 to 23% (p < 0.0001), calls to emergency call-center from 40 to 68% (p < 0.0001), first admission in stroke unit from 8 to 30% (p < 0.0001), and MRI within 24 h from 18 to 42% (p < 0.0001). Onset-to-reperfusion time significantly decreased from 3h16mn [2 h54-4 h05] to 2h35mn [2 h05-3 h19] (p < 0.0001), mainly related to a decrease in delay from admission to imaging. A significant decrease of disability was observed, as patients with mild disability (mRS [0-2]) at 12 months increased from 48 to 61% (p < 0.0001). Pre-hospital times, however, did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: We observed significant improvement in access to reperfusion therapy, mainly through a strong decrease of in-hospital management times, and in 12-month disability after the implementation of four sets of actions between 2006 and 2016 in the Rhône County. Reducing pre-hospital times remains a challenge.
BACKGROUND: Optimizing access to recanalization therapies in acute ischemic strokepatients is crucial. Our aim was to measure the short and long term effectiveness, at the acute phase and 1 year after stroke, of four sets of actions implemented in the Rhône County. METHODS: The four multilevel actions were 1) increase in stroke units bed capacity and development of endovascular therapy; 2) improvement in knowledge and skills of healthcare providers involved in acute stroke management using a bottom-up approach; 3) development and implementation of new organizations (transportation routes, pre-notification, coordination by the emergency call center physician dispatcher); and 4) launch of regional public awareness campaigns in addition to national campaigns. A before-and-after study was conducted with two identical population-based cohort studies in 2006-7 and 2015-16 in all adult ischemic strokepatients admitted to any emergency department or stroke unit of the Rhône County. The primary outcome criterion was in-hospital management times, and the main secondary outcome criteria were access to reperfusion therapy (either intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular treatment) and pre-hospital management times in the short term, and 12-month prognosis measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) in the long term. RESULTS: Between 2015-16 and 2006-7 periods ischemic strokepatients increased from 696 to 717, access to reperfusion therapy increased from 9 to 23% (p < 0.0001), calls to emergency call-center from 40 to 68% (p < 0.0001), first admission in stroke unit from 8 to 30% (p < 0.0001), and MRI within 24 h from 18 to 42% (p < 0.0001). Onset-to-reperfusion time significantly decreased from 3h16mn [2 h54-4 h05] to 2h35mn [2 h05-3 h19] (p < 0.0001), mainly related to a decrease in delay from admission to imaging. A significant decrease of disability was observed, as patients with mild disability (mRS [0-2]) at 12 months increased from 48 to 61% (p < 0.0001). Pre-hospital times, however, did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS: We observed significant improvement in access to reperfusion therapy, mainly through a strong decrease of in-hospital management times, and in 12-month disability after the implementation of four sets of actions between 2006 and 2016 in the Rhône County. Reducing pre-hospital times remains a challenge.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cohort study; Emergency medical services; Health services research; Ischemic stroke; Organization; Reperfusion therapy; Time-to-treatment
Authors: Kennedy R Lees; Erich Bluhmki; Rüdiger von Kummer; Thomas G Brott; Danilo Toni; James C Grotta; Gregory W Albers; Markku Kaste; John R Marler; Scott A Hamilton; Barbara C Tilley; Stephen M Davis; Geoffrey A Donnan; Werner Hacke; Kathryn Allen; Jochen Mau; Dieter Meier; Gregory del Zoppo; D A De Silva; K S Butcher; M W Parsons; P A Barber; C Levi; C Bladin; G Byrnes Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-05-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: T Brott; H P Adams; C P Olinger; J R Marler; W G Barsan; J Biller; J Spilker; R Holleran; R Eberle; V Hertzberg Journal: Stroke Date: 1989-07 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Timmy Li; Jeremy T Cushman; Manish N Shah; Adam G Kelly; David Q Rich; Courtney M C Jones Journal: Prehosp Disaster Med Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 2.040
Authors: A Kobayashi; A Czlonkowska; G A Ford; A C Fonseca; G J Luijckx; J Korv; N Pérez de la Ossa; C Price; D Russell; A Tsiskaridze; M Messmer-Wullen; J De Keyser Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: Jeffrey L Saver; Gregg C Fonarow; Eric E Smith; Mathew J Reeves; Maria V Grau-Sepulveda; Wenqin Pan; Daiwai M Olson; Adrian F Hernandez; Eric D Peterson; Lee H Schwamm Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-06-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: J Freyssenge; F Renard; A M Schott; L Derex; N Nighoghossian; K Tazarourte; C El Khoury Journal: Int J Health Geogr Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 3.918
Authors: Verónica V Olavarría; Lorena Hoffmeister; Carolina Vidal; Alejandro M Brunser; Arnold Hoppe; Pablo M Lavados Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-04-08 Impact factor: 4.086