Literature DB >> 3339489

Early experience with peer review organizations.

J P Whalen1, B P Schmitt, A M Rossetti.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1988        PMID： 3339489     DOI： 10.1007/bf02595758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN： 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  A hard look at cost containment.

Authors:  E Ginzberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-04-30       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  PRO objectives and quality criteria.

Authors:  P L Grimaldi; J A Micheletti
Journal:  Hospitals       Date:  1985-02-01

3.  Final regulations on Medicare prospective pricing.

Authors:  F R Curtiss
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1984-04

4.  The new era of utilization and quality control: professional review organizations.

Authors:  E J Mihalski
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb

5.  PRO program implementation plods ahead.

Authors:  C Mickel
Journal:  Hospitals       Date:  1984-06-16

6.  PROs will be variation on the PSRO theme.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hospitals       Date:  1983-05-16

7.  Institutional responses to prospective payment based on diagnosis-related groups. Implications for cost, quality, and access.

Authors:  R S Stern; A M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-03-07       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Implementation of the Peer Review Organization program.

Authors:  P L Grimaldi; J A Micheletti
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1984-11

9.  Utilization and quality review under the prospective rate system.

Authors:  P L Grimaldi; J A Micheletti
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1984-02

10.  Peer review organizations. Promises and potential pitfalls.

Authors:  P E Dans; J P Weiner; S E Otter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-10-31       Impact factor: 91.245
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.