Literature DB >> 11355377

Superior performance for visually guided pointing in the lower visual field.

J Danckert1, M A Goodale.   

Abstract

The superior hemiretina in primates and humans has a greater density of ganglion cells than the inferior hemiretina, suggesting a bias towards processing information in the lower visual field (loVF). In primates, this over-representation of the loVF is also evident at the level of striate and extrastriate cortex. This is particularly true in some of the visual areas constituting the dorsal "action" pathway, such as area V6A. Here we show that visually guided pointing movements with the hand are both faster and more accurate when performed in the loVF when compared to the same movements made in the upper visual field (upVF). This was true despite the fact that the biomechanics of the movements made did not differ across conditions. The loVF advantage for the control of visually guided pointing movements is unlikely to be due to retinal factors and may instead reflect a functional bias for controlling skilled movements in this region of space. Possible neural correlates for this loVF advantage for visually guided pointing are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11355377     DOI: 10.1007/s002210000653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  44 in total

1.  The utilization of visual feedback from peripheral and central vision in the control of direction.

Authors:  Michael A Khan; Gavin P Lawrence; Ian M Franks; Eric Buckolz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Differential neurodynamics and connectivity in the dorsal and ventral visual pathways during perception of emotional crowds and individuals: a MEG study.

Authors:  Hee Yeon Im; Cody A Cushing; Noreen Ward; Kestutis Kveraga
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  No evidence of a lower visual field specialization for visuomotor control.

Authors:  Gord Binsted; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Peripheral vision for perception and action.

Authors:  Liana E Brown; Brooke A Halpert; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Differences in visuomotor control between the upper and lower visual fields.

Authors:  Michael A Khan; Gavin P Lawrence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  A lower visual field advantage for endpoint stability but no advantage for online movement precision.

Authors:  Olav Krigolson; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Keep looking ahead? Re-direction of visual fixation does not always occur during an unpredictable obstacle avoidance task.

Authors:  Daniel S Marigold; Vivian Weerdesteyn; Aftab E Patla; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Visuomotor representation decay: influence on motor systems.

Authors:  Tyler M Rolheiser; Gordon Binsted; Kyle J Brownell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Eye position-dependent activity in the primary visual area as revealed by fMRI.

Authors:  Frédéric Andersson; Marc Joliot; Guy Perchey; Laurent Petit
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Damage to superior parietal cortex impairs pointing in the sagittal plane.

Authors:  James Danckert; Lana Goldberg; Carol Broderick
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.