| Literature DB >> 33394149 |
Simona Barbuto Ferraiuolo1, Marcella Cammarota1, Chiara Schiraldi1, Odile Francesca Restaino2.
Abstract
Streptomyces is one of the most versatile genera for biotechnological applications, widely employed as platform in the production of drugs. Although streptomycetes have a complex life cycle and metabolism that would need multidisciplinary approaches, review papers have generally reported only studies on single aspects like the isolation of new strains and metabolites, morphology investigations, and genetic or metabolic studies. Besides, even if streptomycetes are extensively used in industry, very few review papers have focused their attention on the technical aspects of biotechnological processes of drug production and bioconversion and on the key parameters that have to be set up. This mini-review extensively illustrates the most innovative developments and progresses in biotechnological production and bioconversion processes of antibiotics, immunosuppressant, anticancer, steroidal drugs, and anthelmintic agents by streptomycetes, focusing on the process development aspects, describing the different approaches and technologies used in order to improve the production yields. The influence of nutrients and oxygen on streptomycetes metabolism, new fed-batch fermentation strategies, innovative precursor supplementation approaches, and specific bioreactor design as well as biotechnological strategies coupled with metabolic engineering and genetic tools for strain improvement is described. The use of whole, free, and immobilized cells on unusual supports was also reported for bioconversion processes of drugs. The most outstanding thirty investigations published in the last 8 years are here reported while future trends and perspectives of biotechnological research in the field have been illustrated. KEY POINTS: • Updated Streptomyces biotechnological processes for drug production are reported. • Innovative approaches for Streptomyces-based biotransformation of drugs are reviewed. • News about fermentation and genome systems to enhance secondary metabolite production.Entities:
Keywords: Antibiotic; Bioconversion; Biotechnological process; Secondary metabolites; Steroid; Streptomyces
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33394149 PMCID: PMC7780072 DOI: 10.1007/s00253-020-11064-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol ISSN: 0175-7598 Impact factor: 4.813
Fig. 1Different biotechnological applications of streptomycetes based on their life cycle. Streptomyces life cycle includes spore chains and spores that generally differentiate on solid media while the vegetative mycelium and aerial hyphae forms are obtained after growth in liquid cultures. According to the different life cycle phases and metabolism stages, the streptomycetes could be employed in diverse biotechnological applications
Summary of different bioconversion approaches for drug production by Streptomyces
| Whole cell biocatalysis in batch and pulsed-batch fermentation | Hydrocortisone → 16α-hydroxyhydrocortisone | Hydroxylation → 16α-hydroxylase; roseoredoxin and roseoredoxin reductase | Optimization of medium composition and of the timing of substrate addition, pH and temperature in shake flask experiments; scale-up in batch and pulsed-batch processes | 84.0% | Restaino et al. | |
| Coupled whole cell biocatalysis in shake flasks | Hydrocortisone → 16α-hydroxyprednisolone | Hydroxylation → 16α-hydroxylase; roseoredoxin and roseoredoxin reductase; 1,2 dehydrogenation →Δ1-dehydrogenase | Optimization of pH and temperature of bioconversion in shake flask experiments. Bioconversion obtained at pH 6.0 and 26 °C in 120 h by coupling the two strains. | 68.8% | Restaino et al. | |
| Whole cell immobilization on polyurethane foam cubes | Tylosin → acetylisovaleryltylosin | Acetylation and substitution with isovaleric acid → various enzymes | Immobilized cell activity was 1.65 times higher than free cell activity; repeated batches up to 6 cycles | 86.3% | Zhu et al. | |
| Immobilization on macroporous resins | Glycerol + long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids → triacylglycerols | Esterification → thermostable lipase (MAS1) | Immobilized lipase was almost 7 times more stable to heat than its free form; it could be reused for up to 5 cycles | 97.5% in 24 h | Wang et al. | |
| Cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs) | Poly-(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate → chiral (R)-3-hydroxybutyric acid | Hydrolysis → poly-(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate depolymerase | Immobilized depolymerase was almost 5 times more stable to heat than its free form; it could be reused for up to 20 cycles | Not reported | Hormigo et al. | |
| All-enzymes hydrogel | Imines → optically active amines | Reduction → NADPH-dependent-(S)-selective dimeric imine reductase | Glucose-1-dehydrogenase from | 150 g· L-1 ·day-1 | Bitterwolf et al. | |
| Immobilization on glass microbeads | Antibodies fragments or whole antibodies → conjugated antibodies | Conjugation → microbial transglutaminase | Conjugation substrate includes fluorescent probes or metal chelator for radio-labeling | Not reported | Spycher et al. | |
| Immobilization on silane modified iron (II, III) oxide magnetic nanoparticles (MNP) | Cholesterol → 4-cholesten-3-one | Oxidation → cholesterol oxidase | Immobilized cholesterol oxidase activity was 2 times higher than its free form; it could be reused for up to 10 cycles | Not reported | Ghosh et al. | |
| Immobilization on silicon dioxide-coated magnetite biosensor | Cholesterol → 4-cholesten-3-one | Oxidation → cholesterol oxidase | Immobilized enzyme was more than 2 times efficient than its free form; enzyme concentration was 20 mg·mL-1, substrate concentration was 6.46 mM; it could be reused for up to 30 days | 90.0% in 180 min | Perdani et al. | |
| Multi-step random UV mutagenesis | Compactin → pravastatin | - | Mutagenesis was performed in order to obtain mutants resistant for high compactin concentrations; 50 h of reaction time | 91.0 % | Dzhavakhiya et al. | |
| Structure-guided engineering and directed evolution | Ethyl-4-chloro-3-oxobutyrate → ethyl-(S)-4-chloro-3-hydroxylbutyrate | Reduction → carbonyl reductase | Mutagenesis was performed to improve both thermal stability and catalytic activity; substrate concentration = 100 g·L-1; bioreactor = 300 mL; reaction time = 9 h | 255 g· L−1 day-1 | Li et al. | |
| Heterologous expression in | Phosphatidylcholine + | Transphosphatidylation → phospholipase D | Repeated batch conditions up to 4 cycles: 8 h reaction; 200 mL of 0.2 M sodium acetate buffer; 40 °C, pH 5,5; 3 U·mL-1 biocatalyst; 1:3 phosphatidylcholine: | 53.0% | Liu et al. | |
| Heterologous expression in | Non-oxidative deamination → tyrosine ammonia lyases | Bioconversion conditions: 50 °C, pH 11; 10 mM glycine-NaOH buffer; 10 OD600 cell concentration; substrate concentration 30 mM; 1 h reaction time | 58.6% | Cui et al. | ||
| Heterologous expression in | Decarboxylation → glutamate decarboxylase | Best results obtained by glutamate decarboxylase from | 67.0% | Yuan et al. | ||
| Heterologous expression in | Decarboxylation → glutamate decarboxylase | Biocatalyst can be reused for up to 10 cycles; | 60.8% | Yuan et al. | ||
| Heterologous expression in | Papaverine → 6-O-demethyl-papaverine | Demethylation → CYP105D1 | Bioconversion conditions: 25 °C; pH 7, 5; 8 g of biocatalyst; 3% v/v PEG-200; substrate concentration 50 mg·L-1; 24 h reaction time | 61.1% | Shen et al. |
Fig. 2SEM pictures of Streptomyces roseochromogenes ATCC 13400 in liquid cultures during hydrocortisone bioconversion at 0, 4, and 48 h, respectively (a–c): the accumulation of material on the cell surface is due to the process of steroid bioconversion and it is indicated by the arrows (c); SEM pictures of Streptomyces roseochromogenes ATCC 13400 whole cells as immobilized in calcium alginate beads (d–f): a tight mycelium was visible in the picture of bead internal view (f); SEM pictures of Streptomyces cyanogriseus ATCC 27426 in liquid cultures during secondary metabolite production at 96, 168, and 264 h, respectively (g–i): morphology changes with increase of cell tangling, branching, and rugosity are visible. (Mag from × 82 to × 20,000, scale bar from 2 to 200 μm). (Preparation of the samples for SEM analyses: small volumes of culture (1 mL) were pelleted end suspended in 4% formalin in PBS for 18 h, dehydrated in increasing ethanol concentrations (from 30 to 100% for 5–15 min), dried in a critical point dryer, and sputtered with platinum-palladium (sputter coater Denton Vacuum Desk V). Fe-SEM Supra 40 Zeiss (5 kV, detector InLens) and Smart SEM Zeiss software were used for observation
Summary of different biotechnological approaches for secondary metabolite production by Streptomyces
| Streptomycin | Optimization of pH, carbon source, and metal ions | 10.0 g Slb St, 0.3 g casein, 2.0 g K2HPO4, 2.0 g KNO3, 2.0 g NaCl, 0.2 g CaCO3, 0.01 g FeSO4, 0.05 g MgSO4·7H2O | Agar plates, 37 °C, pH = 8.5, 96 h | 4.30 | 0.045 | Singh et al. | |
| Melanin | Optimization of carbon source, nitrogen source, and metal ions by response surface method | 3.27 g Amylo Dext, 37.0 g YE, 5.0 g NaCl, 0.1 g CaCl2, 50 μmol CuSO4, 0.25 mg tyrosine | Shake flask, 28 °C, pH = 6.0, 200 rpm, 128 h | 13.7 | 0.107 | Guo et al. | |
| Actinorhodin and undecylprodigiosin | Optimization of phosphate and | 55.2 g sodium-glutamate, 40.0 g Glc, 2 mmol MgSO4, 4.6 mmol phosphate, 0.028 g FeSO4∙7 H2O, 0.002 g CuSO4∙5 H2O, 0.0024 g ZnSO4∙7 H2O, 0.008 g MnSO4∙H2O, 5.6∙10−5 g Na2MoO4∙2 H2O, 11.2∙10−5 g CoCl2∙6 H2O | 3.0-L fermentor, 30 °C, pH = 7.0, 0.3–0.5 vvm, 900–1300 rpm, 70 h | - | 0.013 and 0.033 (sp. units·gcdw-1∙h-1) | Wentzel et al. | |
| Daptomycin | Supplementation with sodium decanoate as antibiotic precursor and optimized fed-batch feeding with dextrose | 11.0 g YE, 0.86 g Fe(NH4)2SO4·6H2O, 10.7 g dextrose, 72.0 g potato Dext, 7.2 g cane molasses | 3.6-L fermentor, 30 °C, pH = 6.5, 3.5 vvm, 450 rpm, 288 h | 0.81 | 0.003 | Ng et al. | |
| Nemadectin | WHd + RT impeller configuration, 25–55% DO by O2 supply, moderate agitation speed | 20.0 g Glc, 90.0 g CS, 25.0 g SoyF, 5.0 g YE, 4.0 g CaCO3,11.0 g MgSO4·7H2O, 0.01 g CuSO4, 0.002 g CoCl2, 0.001 g MnSO4 | 5.0-L fermentor, 28 °C, pH = 7.4, 1.3 vvm, 650 rpm,192 h | 1.37 | 0.007 | Song et al. | |
| Daptomycin | Cell immobilization on ultra-porous refractory brick flakes or silk sachets, airlift bioreactor | 10.0 g Glc, 30.0 g Dext, 20.0 g SoyF, 0.6 g Fe(NH4)2SO4, 0.2 g KH2PO4 | 2.0-L fermentor, 30 °C, pH = 7.0, 200 rpm, 132 h each cycle | 4.89 on refractory bricks and 3.62 on silk sachets | 0.005 (considering 8 cycles on refractory bricks and 6 cycles on silk sachets) | Chakravarty and Kundu | |
| Actinorhodin | Cell encapsulation in calcium alginate beads | 20.0 g Glc, 0.2 g CSA, 10.0 g YE, 42.0 g MOPS, 0.5 g K2SO4 , 20.2 g MgCl2 | Shake flask, 30 °C, pH = 6.8, 200 rpm, 192 h | 3.17 | 0.016 | López-García et al. | |
| Actinorhodin and undecylprodigiosin | Cell immobilization on PLA or PLA-plasma membranes | 20.0 g Glc, 200.0 g sucrose, 0.2 g CSA, 10.0 g YE, 42.0 g MOPS, 0.5 g K2SO4, 20.2 g MgCl2 | Shake flask, 30 °C, pH = 6.8, 200 rpm, 168 h | 0.28 and 0.015 | 0.016 and 8.92*10-5 | Scaffaro et al. | |
| Ascomycin | Femtolaser mutation and shikimic acid addition | 24.0 g Slb St, 40.0 g Dext, 5.0 g Pep, 7.0 g YE, 2.0 g CSL, 11.0 mL SoybO, 1.5 g Sh A, 0.5 g K2HPO4·3H2O, 1.5 g (NH4)2SO4, 1.0 g MgSO4·7H2O, 1.0 g CaCO3 | Shake flask, 28 °C, pH = 6.7, 200 rpm, 144 h | 0.45 | 0.003 | Qi et al. | |
| Ascomycin | Addition of resin, of n-hexadecane, valine, lysine | 24.0 g Slb St, 40.0 g Dext, 5.0 g Pep, 7.0 g YE, 2.0 g CSL, 11.0 mL Soyb O, 1.5 g Sh A, 0.5 g K2HPO4·3H2O, 1.5 g (NH4)2SO4, 1.0 g MgSO4·7H2O, 1.0 g CaCO3 | Shake flask, 28 °C, pH = 6.7, 200 rpm, 144 h | 0.46 | 0.003 | Qi et al. | |
| FK506 | UV and NTG mutagenesis, with selection for disodium malonate and disodium methylmalonate resistance. Genome shuffling and FK506 resistance. Dynamic fed-batch with disodium malonate and disodium methylmalonate addition. | 60.0 g St, 2.0 g YE, 2.5 Pep, 5.0 g Soyb M, 0.5 g K2HPO4, 0.5 g MgSO4, 0.5 g CaCO3 | 7.5-L fermentor, 28 °C, pH = 6.8, 200–1000 rpm, 1.0 vvm, 144 h | 0.51 | 0.003 | Du et al. | |
| Natamycin | WhiGch gene overexpression | 0.4 g Glc, 0.03 g YE, 0.03 g ME, 0.5 g TR | Shake flask, 30 °C, pH = 7.2, 250 rpm, 120 h | wt = 1.5, LG02 mut = 2.5 | wt = 0.012, LG02 mut = 0.021 | Liu et al. | |
| Avermectin B1a | Enhancement of aveR and malE genes expression by treating the strain with nanosecond pulsed electric field | 70.0 g Slb St, 16.0 g YE, 0.5 g K2HPO4·3H2O, 0.5 g MgSO4·7H2O, 4.0 g KCl, 10.0 mg CoCl2·6H2O, 2.0 g CaCO3 | Shake flask, 28 °C, pH = 7.0, 220 rpm, 120 h | 0.015 | 0.0001 | Guo et al. | |
| Ivermectin B1a | Construction of a biosynthetic gene cluster | 140.0 g CS, 0.1 g α-amylase, 28.0 g SoyF, 10.0 g YE, 0.022 g Na2MoO4·2H2O, 0.0023 g MnSO4·H2O, 0.25 g (NH4)2SO4, 0.02 g CoCl2, 0.8 g CaCO3 | Shake flask, 28 °C, pH = 7.5, 220 rpm, 240 h | 1.25 | 0.005 | Deng et al. |
CSA casamino acids, CS corn starch, CSL corn step liquor, Dext dextrin, DO dissolved oxygen, Glc glucose, ME malt extract, MOPS 3-morpholinopropane-1-sulfonic acid, NTG nitrosoguanidine, Slb St soluble starch, St starch, Pep peptone, PLA polylactic acid, Sh A shikimic acid, SoyF soybean flour, Soyb M soybean meal, Soyb O soybean oil, TR tryptone, WHd + RT wide-blade hydrofoil impeller and rushton turbine; YE yeast extract