Literature DB >> 3339377

Measurement of the clinical status of patients with breast cancer: evidence for the validity of self assessment with linear analogue scales.

N F Boyd1, P J Selby, H J Sutherland, S Hogg.   

Abstract

We have assessed the validity of a method of measurement for describing the clinical status of patients with breast cancer. One hundred and nine patients with breast cancer assigned numerical values to their own state of health using linear analogue scales. We have shown previously that this method of measurement is reliable and corresponds well with other methods of assessment. Validity was assessed in this study by examining the ability of measurements to distinguish between groups of patients who differed either in the presence of metastatic disease or in the treatments they were receiving. All patients completed the same set of 29 linear analogue scales that enquired about the severity of health related problems and symptoms. In general, patients with metastatic disease were clearly distinguished from patients without metastases by their scores on items related to physical function. Patients receiving chemotherapy were distinguished from those not receiving chemotherapy by their scores on treatment related toxicities. Measures of psychological and social health were similar in patients receiving chemotherapy regardless of disease status. These results provide further support for the validity of measurement of clinical status with linear analogue scales scored by patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3339377     DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90128-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  9 in total

Review 1.  Methods of assessing the effect of drug therapy on quality of life.

Authors:  P A Ganz
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Evaluation of quality of life for diverse patient populations.

Authors:  K R Yabroff; B P Linas; K Schulman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 3.  Methods and problems in measuring quality of life.

Authors:  D F Cella
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Maintenance of effects of a home-based physical activity program among breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Bernardine M Pinto; Carolyn Rabin; George D Papandonatos; Georita M Frierson; Joseph J Trunzo; Bess H Marcus
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  Assessing quality of life in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  C C Gotay; T D Moore
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Quality of life in patients with ovarian cancer: current state of research.

Authors:  A Montazeri; J McEwen; C R Gillis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Assessment of quality of life in small-cell lung cancer using a Daily Diary Card developed by the Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party.

Authors:  P M Fayers; N M Bleehen; D J Girling; R J Stephens
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  A daily diary for quality of life measurement in advanced breast cancer trials.

Authors:  S C Fraser; A J Ramirez; S R Ebbs; L J Fallowfield; H J Dobbs; M A Richards; T Bates; M Baum
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 9.  Supervised and Non-Supervised Exercise Programs for the Management of Cancer-Related Fatigue in Women with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gonzalo Reverte-Pagola; Horacio Sánchez-Trigo; John Saxton; Borja Sañudo
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 6.575

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.