Literature DB >> 33393472

Trends and Geographic Variation in Acute Respiratory Failure and ARDS Mortality in the United States.

Vibhu Parcha1, Rajat Kalra2, Surya P Bhatt3, Lorenzo Berra4, Garima Arora1, Pankaj Arora5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite numerous advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology, progression, and management of acute respiratory failure (ARF) and ARDS, limited contemporary data are available on the mortality burden of ARF and ARDS in the United States. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the contemporary trends and geographic variation in ARF and ARDS-related mortality in the United States? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the National Center for Health Statistics' nationwide mortality data was conducted to assess the ARF and ARDS-related mortality trends from 2014 through 2018 and the geographic distribution of ARF and ARDS-related deaths in 2018 for all American residents. Piecewise linear regression was used to evaluate the trends in age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) in the overall population and various demographic subgroups of age, sex, race, urbanization, and region.
RESULTS: Among 1,434,349 ARF-related deaths and 52,958 ARDS-related deaths during the study period, the AAMR was highest in older individuals (≥ 65 years), non-Hispanic Black people, and those living in the nonmetropolitan region. The AAMR for ARF-related deaths (per 100,000 people) increased from 74.9 (95% CI, 74.6-75.2) in 2014 to 85.6 (95% CI, 85.3-85.9) in 2018 (annual percentage change [APC], 3.4 [95% CI, 2.2-4.6]; Ptrend = .003). The AAMR (per 100,000 people) for ARDS-related deaths was 3.2 (95% CI, 3.2-3.3) in 2014 and 3.0 (95% CI, 3.0-3.1 in 2018; APC, -0.9 [95% CI, -5.4 to 3.8]; Ptrend = .56). The observed increase in rates for ARF mortality was consistent across the subgroups of age, sex, race or ethnicity, urbanization status, and geographical region (Ptrend < .05 for all). The AAMR (per 100,000 people) for ARF (91.3 [95% CI, 90.8-91.8]) and ARDS-related mortality (3.3 [95% CI, 3.2-3.4]) in 2018 were highest in the South.
INTERPRETATION: The ARF-related mortality increased at approximately 3.4% annually, and ARDS-related mortality showed a lack of decline in the last 5 years. These data contextualize important health information to guide priorities for research, clinical care, and policy, especially during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in the United States.
Copyright © 2020 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ARDS; coronavirus disease; mortality; risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33393472      PMCID: PMC7581392          DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.10.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a life-threatening medical condition characterized by increased preponderance for admission to ICUs and frequently is associated with the need for mechanical ventilation.1, 2, 3 ARDS is a potentially fatal condition characterized by acute-onset, diffuse, inflammatory lung injury that leads to hypoxemic respiratory insufficiency and failure resulting from an increase in pulmonary vascular permeability and loss of ventilated lung parenchyma.4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ARDS is one of the leading causes of ARF. Nearly 3 million patients annually experience ARDS, which contributes to approximately 10% of ICU admissions and approximately 24% of patients receiving mechanical ventilation.3, 4, 5 This potentially fatal respiratory syndrome may be triggered by pulmonary (such as aspiration, coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19], pneumonia, and inhalational injury) or nonpulmonary (such as trauma, pancreatitis, sepsis, and drug toxicity) causes and is associated with high mortality of 35% to 46% based on disease severity at the onset. , , Despite numerous advances in the understanding of the pathophysiology, progression, and management of ARF and ARDS, limited contemporary data are available on the mortality burden of ARF and ARDS in the United States.3, 4, 5 , Importantly, limited data are available on mortality trends in the United States after the adoption of the Berlin definition of ARDS, which was endorsed by the American Thoracic Society and the Society of Critical Care Medicine and was adopted into routine clinical care. , Well-recognized geographic differences in disease management and critical care practices exist that may impact patient outcomes. The contemporary geographic differences in ARF and ARDS mortality in the United States are not known. These geographic differences may be heightened in view of the significant infrastructure strain imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to evaluate the contemporary trends and geographic differences in ARF and ARDS mortality in the United States. We also sought to examine these trends in the demographic subgroups of age, sex, race or ethnicity, and level of urbanization.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of the national mortality from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database was performed to evaluate the recent trends and the geographic distribution of mortality secondary to ARF and ARDS. , This database incorporates the National Center for Health Statistics’ Multiple Cause of Death data, which includes nationwide mortality data derived from the death certificates of all United States residents. , The underlying and contributing causes of death (coded according to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision [ICD-10]), along with the demographic characteristics of the population, are encompassed within the database. , The population estimates incorporated in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research are derived from the United States Census Bureau’s intercensal population estimates. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database was validated previously and has been used in numerous epidemiologic investigations.11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 The study was deemed as nonhuman subjects research and exempt from a full review of the institutional review board. The crude and age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) for ARF-related deaths and ARDS-related deaths were derived by analyzing the mortality data from January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2018. ARF-related mortality was defined as deaths with relevant ICD-10 codes (J80, J96.0, and J96.9) enlisted as the contributing cause of death. ARDS-related mortality was defined using the ICD-10 code J80 (acute respiratory distress) enlisted as the contributing cause of death. In the sensitivity analysis for ARF-related mortality, we included the combination of J80 and J96.0. The AAMRs were age standardized to the 2010 US census population proportions. The AAMR estimates were computed and reported as age-adjusted deaths per 100,000 people. The mortality estimates were evaluated by stratifying the population on the basis of sex, race or ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander, non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native, and Hispanic), level of urbanization (as per the 2013 Urban-Rural Scheme for Counties), geographic region of residence (defined as per the United States Census Bureau), and state of residence at the time of death. We also evaluated the causes of death associated with ARF-related mortality by identifying common diagnoses enlisted as a contributing cause of death. The previously used ICD-10 codes were used for identifying the causes of ARF-related deaths such as influenza and pneumonia, septicemia, , trauma and burns, pneumonitis caused by food and vomit, and acute pancreatitis (e-Table 1). We also explored the seasonal periodicity in the ARF-related and ARDS-related deaths during the study period.

Statistical Analysis

The mortality trends were analyzed using the National Cancer Institute’s Joinpoint Regression Program 4.7.0.0 to assess the ARF-related and ARDS-related mortality during the study period. Using a piecewise linear regression approach, the ideal fit for the AAMR trends during the study period was ascertained. The Joinpoint algorithm estimates the best approach to describe the mortality trend over time, either by a straight line or ≥ 1 linear segments, to create a parsimonious model that provides a good weighted-least-squared fit to the data. , The annual percentage change (APC) was estimated along with the 95% CIs using previously validated methods. , APCs were obtained using Monte Carlo permutation analysis to overcome the uncertainty of the mortality estimates (CIs) by fitting a line through 4,500 different samples of the annual AAMRs. The AAPC was calculated for the ARF-related and ARDS-related mortality in the overall population and each predefined subgroups of age, sex, race or ethnicity, and urbanization status. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for ARF-related mortality defined using the restricted ICD-10 codes (J80 and J96.0). The number of deaths attributed to ARF and ARDS was stratified based on the month of death in each study year and cumulatively from 2014 through 2018 to assess the seasonal variation in the mortality. A two-sided type I error of 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses.

Results

During the 5-year study period, 1,434,349 ARF-related deaths and 52,958 ARDS-related deaths were identified nationwide with an overall AAMR (per 100,000 people) of 81.1 (95% CI, 80.9-81.2) and 3.1 (95% CI, 3.0-3.1), respectively, for the 5-year study period (Table 1 ). The ARF-related mortality (per 100,000 people) was highest in men (AAMR, 93.7 [95% CI, 93.5-93.9]), non-Hispanic Black people (AAMR, 92.5 [95% CI, 92.0-92.9]), those ≥ 65 years of age (AAMR, 467.5 [95% CI, 466.7-468.4]), and in those living in nonmetropolitan areas (AAMR, 91.0 [95% CI, 90.6-91.3]) and in South (AAMR, 86.2 [95% CI, 86.0-86.5]) (Table 1). Similarly, ARDS-related mortality was highest in men, non-Hispanic Black people, those ≥ 65 years of age, and those living in nonmetropolitan areas and in the South (Table 1).
Table 1

Demographic Characteristics for Deaths With ARF and ARDS: 2014-2018

VariableARF
ARDS
DeathsAge-Adjusted Mortality Rate per 100,000 People (95% CI)DeathsAge-Adjusted Mortality Rate per 100,000 People (95% CI)
Overall1,434,34981.1 (80.9-81.2)52,9583.1 (3.0-3.1)
Sex...
 Male713,16793.7 (93.5-93.9)27,8353.5 (3.4-3.5)
 Female721,18271.5 (71.3-71.7)25,1232.7 (2.7-2.8)
Age group, y
 ≤2512,6352.4 (2.4-2.5)1,6950.3 (0.3-0.3)
 25-4437,6409.0 (8.9-9.1)4,7701.1 (1.1-1.2)
 45-64275,22263.0 (62.7-63.2)18,7784.4 (4.3-4.4)
 ≥651,108,810467.5 (466.7-468.4)27,71411.4 (11.3-11.6)
Race or ethnicity
 NH White1,114,04682.2 (82.1-82.4)37,3973.0 (2.9-3.0)
 NH Black158,19792.5 (92.0-92.9)6,7473.6 (3.5-3.7)
 NH Asian/Pacific Islander39,49649.2 (48.7-49.7)2,1922.6 (2.4-2.7)
 NH American Indians/Alaska Native9,50488.2 (86.4-90.1)7065.9 (5.5-6.3)
 Hispanic108,79168.4 (67.9-68.8)5,7423.0 (2.9-3.1)
Urbanization
 Nonmetropolitan267,78091.0 (90.6-91.3)10,2383.7 (3.7-3.8)
 Metropolitan1,166,56979.1 (79.0-79.3)42,7203.0 (2.9-3.0)
Region
 Northeast271,19080.3 (80.0-80.6)8,3872.6 (2.6-2.7)
 Midwest291,81475.4 (75.1-75.7)10,7982.9 (2.9-3.0)
 South564,76986.2 (86.0-86.5)21,7533.4 (3.3-3.4)
 West306,57678.1 (77.8-78.4)12,0203.1 (3.0-3.1)

Data are presented as No., unless otherwise indicated. ARF = acute respiratory failure; NH = non-Hispanic.

Demographic Characteristics for Deaths With ARF and ARDS: 2014-2018 Data are presented as No., unless otherwise indicated. ARF = acute respiratory failure; NH = non-Hispanic.

ARF-Related Mortality Trends

The nationwide crude mortality for ARF-related deaths increased from 79.6 (95% CI, 79.3-79.9) per 100,000 people in 2014 to 96.7 (95% CI, 96.4-97.0) per 100,000 people in 2018 (APC: 5.0 [95% CI, 3.9-6.1]; P = .001). The AAMR showed an increase from 74.9 (95% CI, 74.6-75.2) per 100,000 people in 2014 to 85.6 (95% CI, 85.3-85.9) per 100,000 people in 2018 (APC, 3.4 [95% CI, 2.2-4.6]; P = .003) (Fig 1 ). Among women, the AAMR (per 100,000 people) was 66.0 (95% CI, 65.7-66.4) in 2014 and 75.5 (95% CI, 75.2-75.9) in 2018 (APC, 3.5 [95% CI, 2.2-4.8]; P = .004). The men also showed an increase in AAMR (per 100,000 people) from 86.9 (95% CI, 86.4-87.4) in 2014 to 98.7 (95% CI, 98.3-99.3) in 2018 (APC, 3.2 [95% CI, 2.1-4.3]; P = .002) (Fig 2 ).
Figure 1

A-D, Line graphs showing trends in acute respiratory failure-related and ARDS-related mortality stratified by crude (A, C) and age-adjusted mortality (B, D) rates from 2014 through 2018.

Figure 2

A-D, Line graphs showing trends in acute respiratory failure-related and ARDS-related mortality stratified by sex (A, C) and race or ethnicity (B, D) from 2014 through 2018. NH = non-Hispanic.

A-D, Line graphs showing trends in acute respiratory failure-related and ARDS-related mortality stratified by crude (A, C) and age-adjusted mortality (B, D) rates from 2014 through 2018. A-D, Line graphs showing trends in acute respiratory failure-related and ARDS-related mortality stratified by sex (A, C) and race or ethnicity (B, D) from 2014 through 2018. NH = non-Hispanic. The ARF-related mortality (per 100,000 people) was highest in older people (age ≥ 65 years) from 2014 (431.7 [95% CI, 429.8-433.7]) through 2018 (492.2 [95% CI, 490.2-494.1]; APC, 3.3 [95% CI, 1.7-4.9]; P = .007), with a significant increase in younger (25-44 years of age) and middle-aged (45-64 years of age) adults (P < .05 for both) (Table 2 ). The ARF-related mortality increased in all racial and ethnic subgroups (P < .05 for all) except non-Hispanic American Indians or Alaska Natives (P = .12) (Fig 2, Table 2). This increasing trend was consistent across urbanization status, with both metropolitan (APC, 4.2 [95% CI, 2.8-5.6]; P = .002) and nonmetropolitan (APC, 3.2 [95% CI, 2.1-4.4]; P = .003) areas showing an increase in AAMR (Fig 3 , Table 2).
Table 2

Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates for ARF-Related and ARDS-Related Mortality Stratified by Demographic Subgroups

VariableAge-Adjusted Mortality Rate per 100,000 People (95% CI)
Annual Percentage Change (95% CI)P Value
20142015201620172018
Overall
 ARF74.9 (74.6-75.2)78.8 (78.5-79.1)80.8 (80.5-81.1)84.6 (84.3-84.9)85.6 (85.3-85.9)3.4 (2.2-4.6).003
 ARDS3.2 (3.2-3.3)2.9 (2.8-2.9)3.2 (3.1-3.2)3.0 (2.9-3.0)3.0 (3.0-3.1)−0.9 (−5.4 to 3.8).56
Sex
 ARF
 Male86.9 (86.4-87.4)91.3 (90.8-91.7)93.4 (92.9-93.8)97.4 (96.9-97.9)98.7 (98.3-99.3)3.2 (2.2-4.3).002
 Female66.0 (65.7-66.4)69.5 (69.1-69.8)71.2 (70.9-71.6)74.9 (74.5-75.3)75.5 (75.2-75.9)3.5 (2.2-4.8).004
 ARDS
 Male2.3 (2.3-2.4)3.4 (3.3-3.5)3.6 (3.5-3.7)3.4 (3.4-3.5)3.4 (3.3-3.5)5.6 (−8.8 to 22.3).32
 Female2.3 (2.3-2.4)2.5 (2.5-2.6)2.8 (2.7-2.9)2.6 (2.6-2.7)2.8 (2.7-2.8)3.2 (−2.2 to 8.9).16
Age Group, y
 ARF
 ≤ 242.3 (2.2-2.4)2.3 (2.2-2.4)2.6 (2.5-2.7)2.4 (2.3-2.5)2.5 (2.4-2.6)2.5 (−1.2 to 6.2).13
 25-448.2 (8.0-9.4)8.3 (8.1-8.5)9.2 (9.0-9.4)9.3 (9.1-9.5)9.8 (9.6-10.0)4.6 (2.2-7.1).009
 45-6458.3 (57.8-58.9)60.1 (59.6-60.6)63.7 (63.2-64.3)65.5 (64.9-66.0)67.1 (66.5-67.6)3.7 (2.6-4.9).002
 ≥ 65431.7 (429.8-433.7)457.7 (455.7-459.6)463.3 (461.4-465.3)489.1 (487.1-491.0)492.2 (490.2-494.1)3.3 (1.7-4.9).007
 ARDS
 ≤ 240.3 (0.3-0.4)0.3 (0.3-0.3)0.4 (0.3-0.4)0.3 (0.3-0. .3)0.3 (0.3-0.4)1.0 (−6.9 to 9.6).73
 25-441.3 (1.2-1.3)1.0 (0.9-1.1)1.2 (1.1-1.2)1.1 (1.0-1.2)1.2 (1.1-1.3)−1.0 (−10.0 to 9.0).77
 45-644.8 (4.7-4.9)3.9 (3.8-4.1)4.6 (4.5-4.7)4.1 (4.0-4.3)4.3 (4.2-4.5)−1.7 (−9.9 to 7.3).58
 ≥ 6511.5 (11.2-11.8)11.3 (11.0-11.7)11.7 (11.3-12.0)11.5 (11.2-11.8)11.1 (10.8-11.4)−0.60 (−2.6 to 1.4).41
Race or ethnicity
 ARF
 NH White75.7 (75.4-76.0)80.0 (79.6-80.3)81.8 (81.5-82.2)86.1 (85.7-86.4)87.1 (86.8-87.5)3.6 (2.3-4.9).003
 NH Black86.2 (85.1-87.2)89.3 (88.2-90.3)93.0 (92.0-94.1)95.6 (94.6-96.7)97.4 (96.4-98.5)3.2 (2.3-4.0).001
 NH Asian/Pacific Islander47.1 (46.0-48.2)48.6 (47.5-49.7)48.7 (47.6-49.8)50.7 (49.6-51.7)50.6 (49.6-51.7)1.9 (0.8-3.0).01
 NH American Indian/Alaska Native82.0 (77.8-86.1)89.2 (85.0-93.4)88.6 (84.5-92.7)90.8 (86.7-94.8)90.0 (86.1-93.9)1.9 (−1.0 to 4.9).12
 Hispanic63.3 (62.4-64.3)64.8. (63.8-65.7)68.4 (67.5-69.4)71.4 (70.4-72.3)72.7 (71.7-73.6)3.8 (2.6-5.0).002
 ARDS
 NH White3.2 (3.1-3.2)2.8 (2.7-2.9)3.1 (3.0-3.2)2.9 (2.8-3.0)3.0 (2.9-3.0)−1.2 (−6.2 to 4.2).53
 NH Black3.7 (3.5-3.9)3.4 (3.3-3.6)3.7 (3.5-3.9)3.6 (3.4-3.8)3.7 (3.5-3.9)0.3 (−2.8 to 3.6).76
 NH Asian/Pacific Islander2.6 (2.4-2.9)2.6 (2.3-2.8)2.5 (2.3-2.8)2.6 (2.4-2.8)2.5 (2.3-2.7)−0.9 (−2.7 to 1.0).22
 NH American Indian/Alaska Native6.9 (5.8-8.0)6.1 (5.1-7.0)5.6 (4.6-6.5)5.6 (4.7-6.6)5.7 (4.8-6.6)−4.3 (−9.6 to 1.4).09
 Hispanic3.1 (2.9-3.3)2.8 (2.6-2.9)3.2 (3.0-3.4)3.1 (2.9-3.3)2.9 (2.8-3.1)0.1 (−6.3 to 7.0).96
Urbanization
 ARF
 Nonmetropolitan82.6 (81.8-83.3)87.6 (86.8-88.4)91.1 (90.3-91.9)95.8 (95.0-96.6)97.4 (96.6-98.1)4.2 (2.8-5.6).002
 Metropolitan73.4 (73.1-73.7)77.1 (76.8-77.4)78.8 (78.5-79.1)82.5 (82.2-82.8)83.4 (83.1-83.7)3.2 (2.1-4.4).003
 ARDS
 Nonmetropolitan4.1 (3.9-4.2)3.4 (3.3-3.6)3.9 (3.7-4.1)3.5 (3.3-3.6)3.7 (3.5-3.8)−2.0 (−9.0 to 5.6).45
 Metropolitan3.1 (3.0-3.1)2.8 (2.7-2.9)3.0 (3.0-3.1)2.9 (2.8-3.0)2.9 (2.8-3.0)−0.7 (−4.6 to 3.5).64
Region
 ARF
 Northeast75.2 (74.5-75.9)79.7 (79.0-80.4)79.2 (78.5-79.9)82.9 (82.3-83.6)84.2 (83.5-84.9)2.7 (1.1-4.3).01
 Midwest68.3 (67.7-68.9)73.3 (72.7-73.9)75.2 (74.6-75.8)78.8 (78.2-79.4)80.9 (80.3-81.6)4.2 (2.8-5.5).002
 South80.7 (80.2-81.2)82.9 (82.4-83.4)85.6 (85.1-86.1)89.9 (89.4-90.4)91.3 (90.8-91.8)3.3 (2.4-4.2).001
 West71.2 (70.5-71.8)76.1 (75.4-76.7)79.1 (78.5-79.7)82.3 (81.7-83.0)81.2 (80.6-81.8)3.4 (0.7-6.2).03
 ARDS
 Northeast2.7 (2.6-2.8)2.4 (2.3-2.6)2.7 (2.6-2.9)2.6 (2.4-2.7)2.6 (2.5-2.7)−0.4 (−5.1 to 4.5).80
 Midwest3.1 (2.9-3.2)2.8 (2.7-2.9)3.0 (2.9-3.1)2.7 (2.6-2.8)2.8 (2.7-3.0)−1.8 (−6.0 to 2.6).28
 South2.3 (2.3-2.4)3.1 (3.0-3.2)3.5 (3.4-3.6)3.3 (3.2-3.4)3.3 (3.2-3.4)6.6 (−5.5 to 20.2).19
 West2.3 (2.3-2.4)2.9 (2.7-3.0)3.2 (3.1-3.3)3.1 (2.9-3.2)3.0 (2.9-3.1)6.3 (−3.1 to 16.6).13

ARF = acute respiratory failure; NH = non-Hispanic.

Figure 3

A-D, Line graphs showing trends in acute respiratory failure-related and ARDS-related mortality stratified by geographical region (A, C) and urbanization (B, D) from 2014 through 2018.

Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates for ARF-Related and ARDS-Related Mortality Stratified by Demographic Subgroups ARF = acute respiratory failure; NH = non-Hispanic. A-D, Line graphs showing trends in acute respiratory failure-related and ARDS-related mortality stratified by geographical region (A, C) and urbanization (B, D) from 2014 through 2018. The sensitivity analysis of the ARF-related mortality trends using the ICD-10 codes J80 and J96.0 also demonstrated an increasing mortality trend (e-Fig 1). This was consistent across the subgroups of sex, race and ethnicity, census regions, and urbanization status (e-Figs 2 and 3).

ARDS-Related Mortality Trends

The crude mortality (per 100,000) for ARDS-related deaths was 3.4 (95% CI, 3.3-3.4) in 2014 and 3.3 (95% CI, 3.3-3.4) in 2018 (APC, 0.2 [95% CI, −4.2 to 4.7]; P = .91). The AAMR also was stable at 3.2 (95% CI, 3.2-3.3) per 100,000 people in 2014 and 3.0 (95% CI, 3.0-3.1) per 100,000 people in 2018 (APC, −0.9 [95% CI, −5.4 to 3.8]; P = .56) (Fig 1). Among women, the AAMR (per 100,000 people) was 2.3 (95% CI, 2.3-2.4) in 2014 and 2.8 (95% CI, 2.7-2.8) in 2018 (APC, 3.1 [95% CI, −2.2 to 8.9]; P = .16). The AAMR for ARDS-related mortality in men (per 100,000 people) was 2.3 (95% CI, 2.3-2.4) in 2014 and 3.4 (95% CI, 3.3-3.5) in 2018 (APC, 5.6 [95% CI, −8.8 to 22.3]; P = .32) (Fig 2). The ARDS-related mortality (per 100,000 people) was highest in older (≥ 65 years of age) people from 2014 (11.5 [95% CI, 11.2-11.8]) through 2018 (11.1 [95% CI, 10.8-11.4]; APC, −0.6 [95% CI, −2.6 to 1.4]; P = .41) (Table 2). The ARDS-related mortality (per 100,000 people) was highest in non-Hispanic American Indians or Alaska Natives from 2014 (6.9 [95% CI, 5.8-8.0]) through 2018 (5.7 [95% CI, 4.8-6.6]; APC, −4.3 [95% CI, −9.6 to 1.4]; P = .09) (Fig 2, Table 2). Similar to ARF-related mortality, the ARDS-related mortality (per 100,000 people) was higher in nonmetropolitan areas between 2014 (4.1 [95% CI, 3.9-4.2]) and 2018 (3.7 [95% CI, 3.5-3.8]; APC, −2.0 [95% CI, −9.0 to 5.6]; P = .45) (Fig 3, Table 2).

Geographic Distribution of ARF-Related Mortality and ARDS-Related Mortality

All the geographical regions showed an increase in ARF-related mortality rates (P < .05 for all) (Fig 3). The ARDS-related mortality remained stable across all census regions between 2014 and 2018 (P > .05 for all) (Fig 3). The state-level geographic distribution of AAMR for ARF-related and ARDS-related mortality (per 100,000 people) in 2018 are shown in Figure 4 . The highest AAMR (per 100,000 people) for ARF-related deaths was seen in Arkansas (AAMR, 154.8 [95% CI, 150.7-159.0]), and the lowest was noted in Maryland (AAMR, 45.0 [95% CI, 43.4-46.5]). In 2018, the ARF-related mortality (per 100,000 people) was highest in the South (AAMR, 84.7 [95% CI, 84.2-85.2]) and lowest in the Midwest (AAMR, 75.3 [95% CI, 74.7-75.9]). The ARDS-related mortality (per 100,000 people) was highest in the South (AAMR, 3.3 [95% CI, 3.2-3.4]) and lowest in the Northeast (2.6 [95% CI, 2.5-2.7]).
Figure 4

A, B, Map of the United States depicting the geographic distribution of (A) acute respiratory failure-related and (B) ARDS-related mortality in 2018, stratified by quartiles. The heatmap represents the age-adjusted mortality (AAMR) in the various states. The age-adjusted prevalence in each state is reported alongside the 95% CIs.

A, B, Map of the United States depicting the geographic distribution of (A) acute respiratory failure-related and (B) ARDS-related mortality in 2018, stratified by quartiles. The heatmap represents the age-adjusted mortality (AAMR) in the various states. The age-adjusted prevalence in each state is reported alongside the 95% CIs.

Seasonal Variation in ARF-Related Mortality and ARDS-Related Mortality

The numbers of deaths resulting from ARF-related mortality and ARDS-related mortality are described in e-Figures 4 and 5. Both ARF-related deaths and ARDS-related deaths were higher during the months of December through March in all the study years (2014-2018).

Causes of Death Associated with ARF-Related Mortality

The contribution of associated causes of ARF-related mortality are depicted in e-Tables 2 and 3. Influenza and pneumonia together and septicemia contributed nearly 41.3% and 37.8%, respectively, of ARF-related deaths with cause evaluated through the study period. In the study period, 16.3%, 3.7%, and 0.9% ARF-related deaths with cause evaluated were accounted for by food- and vomit-associated pneumonitis, trauma and burns, and acute pancreatitis, respectively. The AAMR of the various associated causes of ARF-related deaths is depicted in e-Table 3. An increase was found in the ARF-related deaths associated with influenza and pneumonia (APC, 3.1 [95% CI, 1.5-4.6]; P = .008), septicemia (APC, 4.5 [95% CI, 2.0-7.0]; P = .01), pneumonitis resulting from food and vomit (APC, 4.9 [95% CI, 1.3-8.7]; P = .02), and trauma and burns (APC, 3.5 [95% CI, 2.5-4.4]; P = .001) (e-Fig 6).

Discussion

Our investigation highlights an increasing and perturbing trend for ARF-related mortality and a lack of decline in ARDS-related mortality in the United States. This increase in ARF-related mortality was consistent across the subgroups of age, sex, race and ethnicity, and level of urbanization. The increasing mortality trends were seen consistently in all geographic regions. The ARDS-related mortality showed a lack of improvement and stagnation across the subgroups of sex, race and ethnicity, and urbanization. The ARF-related mortality was contributed mostly by influenza and pneumonia together and septicemia. Substantial geographic heterogeneity was found in the ARF and ARDS mortality across the nation, with the states in the southern region having a disproportionately higher mortality rate compared with those in other regions. Collectively, this portends high ARF- and ARDS-related mortality in certain regions in the United States, which is expected to increase as the COVID-19 pandemic burgeons throughout the country. To the best of our knowledge, no nationwide data exist that report the trends of ARDS-related mortality after the release of the Berlin definition in 2012. Prior nationwide studies in the American population suggested an increasing incidence of ARDS, but with declining national mortality between 1999 and 2013, with a plateau from 2010 through 2013. We note that the ARDS-related mortality has continued to show a lack of decline after 2013 with an increase in ARF-related deaths after 2013. The observed lack of decline in the ARDS-related mortality and increase in the ARF-related deaths in the United States in our study may be consequent of numerous factors. Underrecognition and undertreatment have been stipulated to contribute to the high in-hospital mortality rate of approximately 40% associated with the development of ARDS. , Because of underrecognition, up to one in five cases of severe ARDS may be overlooked, which may result in undertreatment, leading to a greater adverse outcome burden. Consequently, the more sensitive definition of ARDS was introduced in 2012. , Also, an unaccounted lag may exist between the introduction of the Berlin definition and its dissemination and adoption into routine clinical care. This also may have contributed to the observed lack of decline in AAMR for ARDS-related deaths. The rising ARF mortality and nondeclining ARDS mortality in recent years may be attributed partially to the aging population. Increasing age has been associated with increased mortality secondary to ARDS, although the mechanisms remain somewhat unclear. The striking racial differences in ARF and ARDS mortality observed in our study also warrant explanation. Variations in race-based susceptibility to ARDS have been documented previously. , Higher ARDS mortality in non-Hispanic Black people observed in our study indicate that the racial disparities in ARDS mortality, first recognized more than two decades ago, continue to persist. It has also been postulated that a greater burden of comorbidities among non-Hispanic Black people and Hispanic Americans at the time of admission to the ICU may be associated with greater mortality resulting from ARDS. The observed increase also may be a consequence of the increasing incidence of the ARF and ARDS, limited availability of mechanical ventilation devices, and appropriately trained personnel contributing to the burdened of the critical care infrastructure.3, 4, 5 , 30, 31, 32, 33 The inclusion of the wider ICD-10 codes aided in increased recognition of deaths attributable to ARF. Although a nonsignificant change in ARDS-related mortality was found, the demographic patterns remained mostly consistent with ARF-related mortality. We found that influenza and pneumonia together and septicemia are the most common causes associated with ARF-related mortality. We also noted a higher ARF-related and ARDS-related mortality during the winter season, which has a close temporal association with the annual increase in influenza cases in the United States. , The observed geographic variation in the ARF and ARDS-related mortality in the United States may be explained by the variability in the health care infrastructure, demographic substrate, and prevalent comorbidity burden with the states.3, 4, 5 , 31, 32, 33 , 35, 36, 37 The greater proportions of non-Hispanic Black people reside in the southern United States, where the ARF and ARDS mortality is concentrated disproportionately. The role of socioeconomic status and its geographic distribution also may have an impact on ARDS-related mortality, and further research is needed to evaluate the impact of the social determinants of health. The limited availability of mechanical ventilation systems and adequately trained personnel, especially in certain regions, may explain the higher mortality rates seen in the nonmetropolitan areas compared with the metropolitan areas. Furthermore, research is needed to evaluate the impact of access to health care, the proximity to well-equipped hospitals, and the type of hospitals (academic or community hospitals) on the prevalent trends of ARDS-related deaths across the United States. Additionally, geographic variations in critical care practices exist that may contribute to the geographic heterogeneity.31, 32, 33 , 35, 36, 37 In the context of COVID-19, nearly 4% to 29% of patients experience ARDS,38, 39, 40 which is the most common cause of death in COVID-19 patients. The pandemic may burden health-care systems disproportionately in certain geographic regions and may amplify the existing regional and state-level differences in ARDS-mortality. Our data have significant public health implications, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. First, our data regarding ARF and ARDS mortality trends may allow for advanced planning for health-care staffing and scarce inpatient resources, such as ventilators and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation machines, in areas where mortality is traditionally high. Second, our data regarding ARDS mortality could be used further to organize local or regional centers of excellence for the management of severe ARDS-associated COVID-19 in areas where a high prior burden of ARDS mortality exists. This may centralize intensive care resources and expertise for the management of this devastating condition. Finally, our data also should be a call to action to align different health policies and social mechanisms during this pandemic. A vast number of local, regional, and federal government organizations and nongovernmental organizations exist that often are working independently to provide funding, supplies, and urgent administrative support throughout the United States. By demonstrating that differential ARF and ARDS mortality is likely to exist on the basis of historical trends, we hope that all of these organizations may seek collaborative alignment to prioritize resources to areas with the highest proportions of high-risk candidates or higher historic ARDS mortality. In addition to broad national health objectives, addressing risk factors at the local level by the use of focused and tailored health goals and health interventions specific to the population will have positive implications in the improvement of health status nationally in the long term. We acknowledge that our investigation has several important limitations. The study is limited by the absence of individual-level measures such as comorbidity burden, etiologic agent, the severity of ARDS, global clinical condition, and provision of optimal medical therapy. The subjective ascertainment of the cause of death and the use of administrative ICD-10 codes may result in underreporting of ARDS as the cause of death. Additionally, it is difficult to differentiate if the observed increase is the result of an increase in disease incidence or the case-fatality rate. We used a broader definition of ARF using the ICD-10 codes, which allowed for increased sensitivity for capturing ARF-related mortality and was guided primarily by the previously reported underrecognition of ARDS by physicians and the general issues with the use of administrative diagnosis codes. However, this may have lead to a reduction in precision for estimating ARDS-related mortality. Additionally, we also performed sensitivity analyses using the restricted definition of ARF. Despite these limitations, our nationwide analysis used a validated approach to report robust temporal and demographically stratified mortality patterns of ARF-related and ARDS-related mortality in the United States.

Interpretation

An increase in ARF-related mortality has occurred at approximately 3.4% per year, and a lack of decline in ARDS-related mortality, nationally, has occurred in the last 5 years. This worrisome trend is consistent across the subgroups of age, sex, race and ethnicity, urbanization, and geographical regions. Identifying these trends and adapting public health and policy planning efforts to them may help to guide resource and infrastructure organization for the vast morbidity and mortality burden that is expected to accompany the full-scale of ARF and ARDS associated with COVID-19 in the United States.
  38 in total

1.  Critical care bed growth in the United States. A comparison of regional and national trends.

Authors:  David J Wallace; Derek C Angus; Christopher W Seymour; Amber E Barnato; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Mortality Due to Aortic Stenosis in the United States, 2008-2017.

Authors:  Graham H Bevan; David A Zidar; Richard A Josephson; Sadeer G Al-Kindi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Mortality Trends of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in the United States from 1999 to 2013.

Authors:  Shea E Cochi; Jordan A Kempker; Srinadh Annangi; Michael R Kramer; Greg S Martin
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2016-10

4.  Variation in critical care beds per capita in the United States: implications for pandemic and disaster planning.

Authors:  Brendan G Carr; Daniel K Addyson; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Eddy Fan; Daniel Brodie; Arthur S Slutsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Variation in the myosin light chain kinase gene is associated with development of acute lung injury after major trauma.

Authors:  Jason D Christie; Shwu-Fan Ma; Richard Aplenc; Mingyao Li; Paul N Lanken; Chirag V Shah; Barry Fuchs; Steven M Albelda; Carlos Flores; Joe G N Garcia
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  National incidence rates for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) and ARDS cause-specific factors in the United States (2006-2014).

Authors:  Efe Eworuke; Jacqueline M Major; Lydia I Gilbert McClain
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 3.425

8.  Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition.

Authors:  V Marco Ranieri; Gordon D Rubenfeld; B Taylor Thompson; Niall D Ferguson; Ellen Caldwell; Eddy Fan; Luigi Camporota; Arthur S Slutsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Management and outcomes of acute respiratory distress syndrome patients with and without comorbid conditions.

Authors:  Elie Azoulay; Virginie Lemiale; Bruno Mourvillier; Maite Garrouste-Orgeas; Carole Schwebel; Stéphane Ruckly; Laurent Argaud; Yves Cohen; Bertrand Souweine; Laurent Papazian; Jean Reignier; Guillaume Marcotte; Shidasp Siami; Hatem Kallel; Michael Darmon; Jean-François Timsit
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Increased mortality in elderly patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome is not explained by host response.

Authors:  Laura R A Schouten; Lieuwe D J Bos; A Serpa Neto; Lonneke A van Vught; Maryse A Wiewel; Arie J Hoogendijk; Marc J M Bonten; Olaf L Cremer; Janneke Horn; Tom van der Poll; Marcus J Schultz; Roelie M Wösten-van Asperen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2019-10-29
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Macrophage-Targeted Nanomedicines for ARDS/ALI: Promise and Potential.

Authors:  Riddhi Vichare; Jelena M Janjic
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.657

2.  The Use of Nitric Oxide as a Rescue Modality for Severe Adult Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients, Including COVID-19, in Critical Care Rotor Transport: A Retrospective Community Outcome Study.

Authors:  Jason Piecek; Terry Valentino; Ryan Aust; Lora Harris; Jennifer Hancock; Christopher Hardman; Scott F van Poppel
Journal:  Air Med J       Date:  2022-06-13

3.  Coronary artery bypass graft surgery outcomes in the United States: Impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Authors:  Vibhu Parcha; Rajat Kalra; Austin M Glenn; James E Davies; Seth Kuranz; Garima Arora; Pankaj Arora
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-03-30

4.  Protective effect of dexmedetomidine in cecal ligation perforation-induced acute lung injury through HMGB1/RAGE pathway regulation and pyroptosis activation.

Authors:  Huaqin Sun; Hongyi Hu; Xiaoping Xu; Mingsun Fang; Tao Tao; Zhehao Liang
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.269

5.  Machine Learning-Based COVID-19 Patients Triage Algorithm Using Patient-Generated Health Data from Nationwide Multicenter Database.

Authors:  Min Sue Park; Hyeontae Jo; Haeun Lee; Se Young Jung; Hyung Ju Hwang
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2022-02-16

6.  Romulus and Remus of Inflammation: The Conflicting Roles of MAP2K1 and MAP2K2 in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Anasuya Sarkar; Julián A Chamucero-Millares; Mauricio Rojas
Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 7.748

7.  Mortality Risk Factors in Patients Admitted with the Primary Diagnosis of Tracheostomy Complications: An Analysis of 8026 Patients.

Authors:  Lior Levy; Abbas Smiley; Rifat Latifi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Lactate Dehydrogenase to Albumin ratio as a Predictive Factor of COVID-19 Patients' Outcome; a Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Nafiseh Alizadeh; Fatemeh-Sadat Tabatabaei; Amirali Azimi; Neda Faraji; Samaneh Akbarpour; Mehrnoush Dianatkhah; Azadeh Moghaddas
Journal:  Arch Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2022-08-15

9.  Assessing Mechanical Ventilation Management Skills: More Tools for the Toolbox.

Authors:  Clara Schroedl; Kaitlyn Vitale
Journal:  ATS Sch       Date:  2022-06-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.