Literature DB >> 33392881

Reference values of thoracic aorta and pulmonary artery diameters by age and gender in healthy Chinese adults assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: data from national center for cardiovascular diseases of China.

Shuang Li1, Baiyan Zhuang1, Gang Yin1,2, Xinling Yang1,2, Shihua Zhao1, Minjie Lu3,4.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to define normal ranges for thoracic aorta and pulmonary artery diameters relative to gender, age, body surface area (BSA) and body mass index (BMI) in healthy Chinese adults by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). We studied 200 healthy participants (100 men, 100 women; age range from 20-70) by using a 3.0-T CMR system. The diameters of the ascending aorta (AA), main pulmonary artery (PA), proximal descending aorta (DA) and Valsalva sinus (VAS) were measured manually by two experienced doctors on half-Fourier single-shot spin echo (HASTE) and balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) cine images. The mean value and age specific and gender adjusted normal limits were calculated. The linear regression analysis were performed between diameters and gender, age, BMI and BSA. The mean and 95% confidence interval(CI) of AA, PA, DA and VAS were 28.95 ± 4.61 mm(95% CI 19.92-37.99 mm), 22.41 ± 2.59 mm(95% CI 17.31-27.47 mm), 20.61 ± 2.96 mm(95% CI 14.81-26.42 mm), 31.15 ± 3.65 mm(95% CI 24.00-38.29 mm), respectively. The gender differences of all the parameters above were statistically significant (all p < 0.01). Both thoracic aorta and pulmonary artery dilates with the increase of age, while AA has the highest dilation rate. The mean PA/AA was 0.79 and showed no gender difference, but there was statistical difference among all age groups (p < 0.01). AA and DA had stronger association with age and BSA than BMI. Age- and gender-specific reference diameters of thoracic aorta and pulmonary artery were provided in healthy Chinese adults. Age and BSA have stronger effects on the ranges of diameters than BMI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnetic resonance imaging; Normal range; Pulmonary artery; Thoracic aorta

Year:  2021        PMID: 33392881     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-020-02116-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  29 in total

1.  Diseases of the aorta: aneurysm of the ascending aorta.

Authors:  Artur Evangelista
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Multiplane magnetic resonance imaging of the heart and major vessels: studies in normal volunteers.

Authors:  C B Higgins; D Stark; M McNamara; P Lanzer; L E Crooks; L Kaufman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Reference values for normal adult transesophageal echocardiographic measurements.

Authors:  G I Cohen; M White; R A Sochowski; A L Klein; P D Bridge; W J Stewart; K L Chan
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.251

4.  Reference values for echocardiographic assessment of the diameter of the aortic root and ascending aorta spanning all age categories.

Authors:  Laurence Campens; Laurent Demulier; Katya De Groote; Kristof Vandekerckhove; Daniël De Wolf; Mary J Roman; Richard B Devereux; Anne De Paepe; Julie De Backer
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Aortic dimensions in tall men and women.

Authors:  C M Reed; P A Richey; D A Pulliam; G W Somes; B S Alpert
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in normal children and adults.

Authors:  M J Roman; R B Devereux; R Kramer-Fox; J O'Loughlin
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1989-09-01       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Thoracic Aorta Dimension Changes During Systole and Diastole: Evaluation with ECG-Gated Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Jian-Ping Guo; Xin Jia; Zhe Sai; Yang-Yang Ge; Sen Wang; Wei Guo
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 1.466

8.  Determinants of echocardiographic aortic root size. The Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  R S Vasan; M G Larson; D Levy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Proximal thoracic aortic diameter measurements at CT: repeatability and reproducibility according to measurement method.

Authors:  Leslie E Quint; Peter S Liu; Anna M Booher; Kuanwong Watcharotone; James D Myles
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Comparison of aortic elasticity determined by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in obese versus lean adults.

Authors:  Peter G Danias; Nicholas A Tritos; Matthias Stuber; Rene M Botnar; Kraig V Kissinger; Warren J Manning
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 2.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.